Documentary Film Essay, AHVS 364
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Documentary Film Essay, AHVS 364
Questions for Essays
In a 7-10 (double-spaced) page essay, respond to one of the following questions. Your essay should be typed or typed on a computer. This task accounts for 45 percent of your overall grade.
1. It is reasonable to claim […] that the three primary aesthetic styles of film, narrative fiction, documentary, and experimental, were present in embryo form virtually from the beginning. (A History of Film, by Jack C. Ellis and Virginia Wright Wexman)
Ellis and Wexman’s “creative impulses” are important categorizations to utilize when examining film history as a whole. However, it is evident that such clear boundaries do not always include or describe particular films. In at least two documentaries, discuss the usage of methods drawn from narrative fiction or experimental film (at least one of which should be taken from the course screenings).
2. Lenin referred to film as “our most significant art,” implying that he recognized its potential as a propaganda tool. Clearly, totalitarian regimes have embraced film’s potential to persuade, but a similar aim can be found in films produced by democratic governments (for example, Women Are Warriors) as well as “activist” movies like Why We Fight. Discuss documentary’s convincing aspects. In your response, you can discuss both the negative and positive sides of propaganda.
3. The Observational mode employs strategies to persuade the spectator that he or she is viewing “reality.” Despite this, the (hand-held) camera as “fly on the wall” informs us that the events shown in the video are being recorded by a cameraperson. The ethical issues that arise from avoiding direct involvement, as well as the likelihood that the camera’s presence modifies the world it aims to convey, are some of the repercussions of taking an observational perspective. Discuss the relevance of the documentary’s attempt at “objectivity.” How successful are filmmakers in removing their presence? Although you are requested to discuss this subject in regard to the Observational documentary style, you are not limited to it.
* If you do this project, I normally recommend that you focus on the following:
1. What is the plot of the movie?
2. What inspired you to make this film in particular?
3. Why is a documentary (rather than a newspaper/magazine piece, for example) the best way to tell this story?
4. Why would you use whatever mode(s)? Which of these would you not utilize, and why? This enables you to use course films as models of the type of film you want to make.
5. What ethical issues do you think the film will highlight, and how would you deal with them?
Of course, you’re free to bring up other problemsfor example, aesthetic choices or target audiencebut your plan must address these specific concerns.
The writing style might be casual, and you can employ first-person narration. The most important thing is to make your proposal as persuasive as possible, which includes sticking $20 bills to the back of each page and making a compelling case for your planned film. It should be about the same length as the essay’s expected length (7-10 pages, double-spaced). Also, feel free to come talk to me before/after class or during office hours if you want to bounce ideas around. Alternatively, you can send me an email and we can talk about it there.
Screenings for courses:
May 10: Jacques Perrin’s Winged Migration (France, 2001), 89 minutes, color.
https://media3-criterionpic.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/htbin/wwform/006?T= MON1354
Nanook of the North, Robert Flaherty (USA/France 1922), 65 minutes, black-and-white (silent).
Visit https://uvic.kanopy.com/video/nanook-north-0 for more information.
Dziga Vertov’s Man with a Movie Camera (USSR, 1929), 80 minutes, black-and-white (silent).
Visit https://uvic.kanopy.com/video/man-movie-camera for more information.
Why We Fight, by Eugene Jarecki (USA/UK/France/Canada/Denmark 2005), 98 minutes, black-and-white and color
https://media3-criterionpic.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/htbin/wwform/006?T=MON1348
Program of N.F.B. shorts will be screened.
Alanis Obomsawin’s Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance (NFB 1993), 119 minutes, color.
Kanehsatake 270 years of resistance mohawk/ is available at https://www.nfb.ca/film/kanehsatake 270 years of resistance mohawk/.
Grey Gardens, by Albert and David Maysles (USA, 1976), 96 minutes, color
Grey Gardens can be found at https://uvic.kanopy.com/video/grey-gardens.
Mr. Death, Errol Morris (USA 1999), 92 minutes, color and black-and-white. (This will be screened in class.)
Jennifer Baichwal, Edward Burtynsky, and Nicholas de Pencier’s film Anthropocene: The Human Epoch (Canada 2018), 87 minutes, color.
Visit https://uvic.kanopy.com/video/anthropocene-human-epoch for more information.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!