Do Not Feed the Monkeys Game Critique Assignment
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Do Not Feed the Monkeys Game Critique Assignment
DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
The student will complete 1 Discussion in this course. The student will post one thread of at least
400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must
then post 2 replies of at least 200 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module:
Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 1 scholarly citation.
Read a Scholarly Article about CQ: For this discussion, each student will need to select a scholarly journal article about CQ in a specific professional discipline. Note that a variety of articles have been provided in the Discussion Resources area below to relate to a large selection of degree fields and professional interests; however, if a student does not find an article that matches their interests, they can do their own research to find a different article. You should send the article to your professor and get prior approval before using an article if it is different than the ones provided.
Once you have read your article, please answer the following questions in your thread: (Questions in parenthesis are suggestions to help guide your writing).
Briefly summarize the article. (What were the researchers studying? What was the primary thesis of the article? How did they conduct their research? What were the results?)
Using this article as well as other course materials, discuss the implications of Cultural Intelligence in your chosen professional field. (What cross-cultural challenges exist in your profession? How will having high CQ help to address those challenges? What other research needs to be done in order to develop high CQ in your field?)
Imagine you were creating a professional development seminar on cultural intelligence for professionals in your chosen field. Aside from simply defining CQ, what topics would you focus on? How would you help your attendees practically apply CQ to your field? Discussion Resources
BUSINESS: Business Cultural Intelligence Quotient: A Five-Country Study (Links to an external site.)
BUSINESS: Examining Cultural Intelligence and Cross-Cultural Negotiation Effectiveness (Links to an external site.)
BUSINESS: Cultural Intelligence in Organizations (Links to an external site.)
BUSINESS: Developing Cultural Intelligence for Global Leadership Through Mindfulness (Links to an external site.)
BUSINESS: How Does Cultural Intelligence Affect Organizational Culture: The Mediating Role of Cross-cultural Role Conflict, Ambiguity, and Overload (Links to an external site.)
BUSINESS: Motivational Configurations of Cultural Intelligence, Social Integration, and Performance in Global Virtual Teams (Links to an external site.)
COMMERCIAL AVIATION: Cultural Intelligence and Relationship Quality in the Cabin Crew Team: The Perception of Members Belonging to Cultural Minority Groups (Links to an external site.)
EDUCATION: Cultural Intelligence and Leadership Style in the Education Sector (Links to an external site.)
EDUCATION: Does Cultural Intelligence Matter? Effects of Principal and Teacher Cultural Intelligence on Latino Student Achievement (Links to an external site.)
EDUCTION: Introducing Multicultural Experiences through Virtual Partnerships (Links to an external site.)
EDUCATION: Teaching with Cultural Intelligence: Developing Multiculturally Educated and Globally Engaged Citizens (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)
EDUCATION: Multicultural Teaching Efficacy and Cultural Intelligence of Teachers: The Effects of Learning Goal Orientation and Training Readiness (Links to an external site.)
HEALTHCARE: Association Between Cultural Intelligence and Cultural Sensitivity in Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study (Links to an external site.)
MILITARY: The Role of Human Terrain and Cultural Intelligence in Contemporary Hybrid and Urban Warfare (Links to an external site.)
MISSIONS: Cultural Intelligence: A Model for Cross-Cultural Problem Solving (Links to an external site.)
MISSIONS: Cultural Intelligence and Short-Term Missions (Links to an external site.)
PSYCHOLOGY: Cultural Intelligence in Counseling Psychology: Applications for Multicultural Counseling Competence (Links to an external site.)
PSYCHOLOGY: The Moderating Role of Social Media Usage in the Relationship Among Multicultural Experiences, Cultural Intelligence, and Individual Creativity (Links to an external site.)
SOCIAL WORK: Empathy and Social Closeness toward Refugees from Syria: The Mediating Role of Cultural Intelligence (Links to an external site.)
SOCIAL WORK: Cultural Intelligence for Clinical Social Work Practice
Remember to include a citation for your article and any other sources you use at the bottom of your thread.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!