Division of Africa Into Spheres Of Influence Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Division of Africa Into Spheres Of Influence Discussion
These are the 6 questions, Political science
Due in 4 days
6 questions 750 words each, 2 sources each QUESTION, all questions in APA format and provide plagiarism report on all papers
- In 1885 foreign ministers of the European great powers had a conference in Berlin at which they agreed on a division of Africa into spheres of influence. Though Liberia and Ethiopia were acknowledged to be independent states and various kingdoms and chieftaincies away from the coasts also operated outside European control, no Africans were invited to the Conference. What institutional and ideational changes in world politics mean that a similar conference would not be possible today?
- World politics has changed in many ways since the late 18th century. Identify what you regard as the two most important changes and explain why those two are more important than the others.
- Mao Zedong’s approach to developing China combined central planning with very low connection to the global economy. His successors modified both, allowing establishment of local government-owned and private enterprises not subject to planning and opening China’s economy to more international trade and investment in the 1980s. Drawing on theories and analytical schemes learned in class, explain why the changes were made.
- In the 1960s, developing countries – especially the newly independent ones in Africa and Asia – formed the Group of 77 and used the UN General Assembly to advance their views about how world politics and the international economy should be organized. In recent years it has become to use the phrase “the Global South” to designate the same set of more than 120 countries. The phrase suggests two things: that all of those countries can be regarded as common characteristics and that those common characteristics lead them to have similar foreign policy goals. Thinking across the issue areas of security, economic affairs, human rights, and environmental concerns, assess the extent to which states of the Global South do or do not have common goals and explain why the convergences and divergences of goals exist.
- The leaders of the Meiji Restoration in late 19th century Japan often summarized their goals for Japan with the slogan “rich nation, strong army.” What does the slogan suggest about how a country should order its priorities in a decentralized international system? Indicate whether it is an equally relevant guide for a small state and explain why or why not.
- Joseph Nye defines contextual intelligence as “the ability to understand an evolving environment and capitalize on trends” and argues that world politics in the rest of the 21st century will not be about determining which country is “number 1” but about great powers using their power in collaboration with other states and with nonstate actors rather as a tool for dominating those other states and nonstate actors. This is a very different view than the realist emphasis on unending competition among great powers for dominance. What features of contemporary world politics support Nye’s argument?Assignment: Researched Persuasive EssayPage 1 of 7
Page 4 of 7
Assignment: Researched Persuasive Essay
Point Value: 100
Requirements:
Topics should be given wide consideration; however, you have FIVE restrictions:
- It may not be self-plagiarized from another course.
- It must be related to your personal experience, including hobbies or careers.
- It must be relevant to a narrow, current, and locally-significant issue.
- It must be inherently argumentative; a reasonable person could resist or disagree.
- It must be instructor-approved prior to composition.
Additionally,…
- 6. Paper must at least 6 full pages, from introduction to conclusion,
double-spaced; 12 point, Times New Roman font.
- 7. Format will be a formal expository essay structure: introduction with thesis,
Body with topic sentences, and conclusion.
- Label first page with student name and complete assignment and course
information.
- Include header at top right of pages with student name and page numbers.
- Research will adhere to either MLA or APA style (never both); refer to Research
Methods in Modules, NoodleTools, or The Owl at Purdue for details:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
- Secondary research (borrowed) sources to be 6-source minimum,
including one graphic that is referred to, cited, and documented.
Objectives:
For this assignment, you will explore and argue for an original, localized, current practice or issue that needs attention and improvement. Introduce, define and explain the topic so that your readers understand the history and context and appreciate the significance of it.
When selecting a topic, consider topics relevant to your personal experience, authority, and professional field of study. The topic must be made to be inherently argumentative as you will be writing to decision-makers who may be skeptical or even opposed to your position. Your mission is to convince your readers to adopt your position.
Structure:
Because a research paper is an essay, you will want to ensure that you have conventional, 3-part essay structure. Ideally, you will be working from an outline that will serve both the Primary-Source Position paper and this research paper.
Introduction
- Understand your audience. Imagine a primary audience for the essay: the decision-maker(s) who can implement your improvements. You also have a secondary audience that may include your teacher, peers, or college community, so your discussion should clarify the issue for a larger audience.
- Generate reader interest in the topic. Explain why your topic is important so that all audience members feel connected to the topic.
- Provide a context for the discussion, which should include your personal interest and experience in the topic, along with well chosen examples, and any necessary definitions of terms or concepts.
- Establish a neutral, dispassionate tone in formal, polite, precise, literal, and technically-appropriate language that you will sustain throughout the report.
- Conclude your introduction with the vital purpose statementor thesisopinion with a call-to action that is stated explicitly in the introduction and contains the reason for the opinion and a summary of all points of the discussion.
Body
- Every paragraph should contain a clear topic sentence assertion along with substantial research, a combination of primary and secondary ideas.
- All borrowed ideas should include proper source identifications and citations where need.
Conclusion
- Make sure your final paragraph is fully developed and offers a sense of finality.
- Emphasize why your position is important, valid, and highlight important findings.
- Ideally, you should define workable solutions with a clear call-to-action.
- Bring the discussion full circle to the introduction, and be sure to reach out to your audience one last time; make sure you leave a favorable, persuasive impression.
THE FOLLOWING RUBRIC WILL BE APPLIED TO YOUR FINAL DRAFT:
1. Overall Compliance: Correct length, format, number and type of sources, including graphic. +10 2. Introduction: Demonstrates audience awareness and includes helpful background information to clarify issue and reveal its importance. +10 3. Thesis: Based on the completed outline, it contains a workable, explicit opinion that summarizes the content of the body, including opposing view point. +10 4. Body Paragraphs: Based on the completed outline, topic sentences are opinions and paragraphs provide direct & consistent thesis support.
+10 5. Body Research: Presents borrowed and credited information in every paragraph. +10 6. Body Organization: Ideas are unified (consistent topic sentence support), fully developed, and coherent. +05 7. Persuasion Audience: Writer considers and counters opponents or skeptics concerns. + 05 8. Persuasion Fairness: Ideas and research are reasonable and avoid Logical Fallacies and Errors in Reasoning. +05 9. Conclusion: Does not merely repeat ideas, but highlights important issues and presents a Call to Action for a clearly designated audience. +05 10. Overall research: Sources used are ample, credible, and convincing. +05 11. Documentation Style: APA is used consistently and correctly. All borrowed ideas are clearly credited. Citations have clear, corresponding sources listed properly in the back page.
+20 12. Overall Expression: Writing is clear, grammatical, correctly punctuated, concise. Diction is formal, precise. +05 PAGE
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!