Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Return to this discussion thread, read the ideas that have been shared, and offer substantive feedback to at least two of your peers. Do you like their ideas? Do you feel they are headed in the right direction? What specific ideas and suggestions can you offer to help enhance or compliment their efforts and vision for this project?
Although our discussion is intended to be an informal conversation, replies must be substantive, constructive, and supportive, with the ultimate goal of moving the conversation (and our understanding of the topic) forward. If you have any questions about the level of discourse that is expected, please see the Grading Rubric for Online Discussions.
discussion thread one;
1)
Having a global centralized bank will have its pros and cons. Something positive from having a centralized global bank is that fiscal policy will be centralized. This system will be less influenced by politics because the board of directors would be appointed by presidents or prime ministers and the board members terms would have single twelve-year terms like the United States
The cons associated with a global centralized bank is that each countries policies are going to follow their own agendas even at the expense of other countries. They can enact fiscal policy that benefits employment numbers over fiscal policy. Conflicts over fiscal policy can escalate to a violent end but the same argument can be true for having opposing competing currencies.
2)
When we decrease the federal reserve ration we tighten the economy to reduce inflation rates. This means rate of growth of the supply of money is being reduced.
DeltaS *M = $100million
DeltaS * 1/r = $100million
DeltaS * 1/0.05 = $100million
Delta S = $100million * 0.05 = $5million
3)
Sometimes the fallout from institutions failures spill over to many innocent bystanders. When the economy is in a recession, everyone is hurting. I do not support a blank check system to any institution that is too big to fail. If the government needs to intervene to minimize damage to the economy, they should. But this should not be done in a way to incentivize big banks to make risky or reckless lending practices only to fail again. During the Sub-prim crisis, the big banks should have filed for bankruptcy. That is when the government could step in to split up the institutions to compete against each other in the free market. This should be done in a way that is transparent to not promote fear or panic in financial markets.
discussion thread two;
There would be many Pro’s and Con’s coming from one Global Central Bank. All nations would benefit since there would no longer be currency risk in international trade. However, the biggest downfall of a global currency would be the loss of independent monetary policy to regulate national economies. This would result in developed nations being negatively impacted rather than developing nations. Therefore, I would say no on the one Global Central Bank due to the reasons above.
An increase in the reserve requirement ratio reduces the proportion of deposited funds that a financial institution can lend out. Meaning it will reduce the rate at which money can multiply. The maximum money supply released $100,000,000 x 1/.05 = 2 billion dollars.
I don’t see the point in rescuing large financial organizations as it can lead to a much bigger problem and ultimately add more debt onto the Fed.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!