Discussion of Differentiate Cultures Across the Globe
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Discussion of Differentiate Cultures Across the Globe
NOTE: For each question, you can write maximum of one page with 12-font size (Calibri, Times New Roman, Arial) and 1.5 spacing. In total, your answers to Part B and Part C questions should not exceed 6 pages
Answer the following questions. Please note, all questions are compulsory.
- Positive leadership has been argued to be a game changer for business organizations. In your opinion, what is positive leadership and how it will help a specific business organization such as a restaurant, or any other real business, which is closing due to COVID-19 lockdowns? Discuss in detail. (10 Points)
- In the class we discussed some of the important cultural dimensions which help us to differentiate cultures across the globe. Do you think these cultural dimensions would lead us to make more stereotypical assumptions about people from other cultures? What are the implications of this stereotyping in business setting? Please discuss with examples. (10 Points)
- David is an auto electrical engineer in XYZ company for the last two years where he is trying his best to show his performance. David has been working on a new fuel injection system for the last six months. The preliminary testing of the new fuel injection system shows it can reduce at least 10% fuel consumption. He is excited with the initial testing and intend to bring this new fuel injection system in automobile engine in the next two years. It would be impossible to launch this new product without the support of his team and superiors. Being a relatively new in the company, he is not sure, how can he win the trust of his team and convince his supervisor about the positive impact of this new product. Based on the lessons learned in class, what would you recommend to David to motivate his team and convince his boss? Please describe well with rational. (10 Points)
Part C – 10 Points
Please read the case provided at the end and answer the following questions.
- In your opinion, what are the reasons that the regions are not responding to Wilkes’s initiative for change? Analyze Wilkes’s change implementation strategy to explore what is wrong with it? (3 points)
- In your opinion, how can Wilkes solicit more active support from Bernini and McCann for the change he is attempting to implement? Do you think they can help? (2 points)
- If you were implementing this change, what you could have done differently? What would you include in your change implementation plan? (5 points)
CASE:
“From This Point On …”
Bernini Foods is one of several companies offering healthy, frozen-packaged meals in the once-laughable and nutritionally challenged frozen dinner industry. Meeting the changing needs of modern, on-the-go, budget-conscious consumers, the new generation of meals offered by Bernini faces unprecedented competition from long-time industry leaders including Bertolli, Marie Callender’s, Healthy Choice, Lean Cuisine, and others.
Cutthroat competition within the industry means every corporation must hustle for high-quality ingredients, improved packaging, efficiency in delivery systems, and decreased cooking times. Like its competitors, Bernini strives for increased market share through a combination of price cuts and the introduction of new products.
To meet these challenges, CEO Roberto Bernini created a new management position to monitor pricing and purchasing. Vice president for finance Ted McCann hired Lucian Wilkes, a retired army colonel, for the new position, giving him wide latitude for setting up new rules and procedures. With an announcement from CEO Bernini, Wilkes was introduced to the company. Following an intense period of in-house research and information gathering, Wilkes zeroed in on what he saw as the major problems—the fragmentation of pricing and purchasing decisions, with managers in various regions devising their own standards and making their own contracts.
The process sent up red flags for Wilkes. He made an across-the-board e-mail announcement for new standardized procedures, basically informing each regional office that “from this point on …” regional managers must inform his office of any price change above 3 percent. In addition, all local purchase contracts above $10,000 must also be approved by Wilkes’s office prior to implementation.
Directives for these new procedures were issued to regional managers for their policy manuals. These managers, according to their immediate feedback, were all in agreement with the changes. But as one month followed another, Wilkes’s concern and level of frustration grew, and everyone seemed to carry on with a culture of “business as usual.” Managers did not resist. Frequent correspondence across the various regions, including e-mails, faxes, and conference calls, brought repeated assurances that change was coming.
“We just need time to make the changes,” one manager said.
But time dragged on and the situation remained unaltered. Complicating the situation, Wilkes appeared to have no vocal support from company executives, who were busy with their own concerns. While both Bernini and McCann offered lukewarm comments about the need for new initiatives to spur efficiency, neither demonstrated wholehearted support for the changes. The new plan was going nowhere, and Wilkes was aware that the failure of the company to increase profits could result in the loss of his own position.
“If nothing changes,” Wilkes complained to his wife, “the regional managers will remain on the job. My job will be cut.” Wilkes wondered what his next move should be. In how many ways could he inform the managers to implement the new procedures? What pressures could he apply? How could he impress upon Bernini and McCann the importance of their support for the changes? He felt at a loss for what he should do. Did Bernini Foods want these new standards implemented or not?
Source: Daft, R. L and Marcic, D. (2014). Building Management Skills: An Action – First Approach, South-Western CENGAGE Learning, USA.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!