Discrepancies in the Application of the Bill of Rights Discussion
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Discrepancies in the Application of the Bill of Rights Discussion
I’m working on a social science discussion question and need guidance to help me learn.
The noted historian Gordon Wood observed that our Bill of Rights is actually directed against ourselves, we the very people who are the source of sovereignty in the United States. In other words, we must protect our individual rights against a majority of our fellow Americans acting through the democratic process. An example of this is the Supreme Court upholding the individual right to burn the U.S. flag even though the vast majority of Americans would probably wish to see this as a crime. Do you agree with Professor Wood’s observation?
Social Science Leading in The Twenty First Century Discussion
Learning Resources
Inspire Teams with Why
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1627999295?accountid=14872
oKouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
- PRACTICE 1: MODEL THE WAY
- Chapter 3, “Clarify Values” (pp. 47–70)
- Chapter 4, “Set the Example” (pp. 71–92)
- PRACTICE 2: INSPIRE A SHARED VISION
- Chapter 5, “Envision the Future” (pp. 95–116)
- Chapter 6, “Enlist Others” (pp. 117–142)
The Leadership Challenge: How to Make Extraordinary Things Happen in Organizations – PDFDrive.com
Assignment: Personal Leadership Journal
Continue working on your Personal Leadership Journal using the Learning Resources from this week and any additional outside academic materials related to the assignment.
To prepare for your Personal Leadership Journal:
Review your results from Practice 1 and Practice 2 of the LPI Self: Leadership Practices Inventory assignment completed in Week 1.
Review this week’s Learning Resources, especially:
oPersonal Leadership Journal Assignment Instructions
o
oKouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
- PRACTICE 1: MODEL THE WAY
- Chapter 3, “Clarify Values” (pp. 47–70)
- Chapter 4, “Set the Example” (pp. 71–92)
- PRACTICE 2: INSPIRE A SHARED VISION
- Chapter 5, “Envision the Future” (pp. 95–116)
- Chapter 6, “Enlist Others” (pp. 117–142)
oKnight-Wallace, C. (2014, October). Inspire teams with why. The Journal for Quality and Participation. (37)3, 39–40.
o
To complete the Personal Leadership Journal Assignment, compose a cohesive document that addresses the following:
Discuss your results from Practice 1 and Practice 2 of the LPI Self: Leadership Practices Inventory.
Reflect upon how the results from Practice 1 and Practice 2 of the LPI Self: Leadership Practices Inventory have impacted your perceptions of your inner leader.
Be sure to support your Personal Leadership Journal using this week’s readings or other credible and relevant resources. You may also include quotes from the weekly Discussion that you think support your journal entry.
General Guidance: This week’s Personal Leadership Journal submission should be about 3–4 pages in length. Refer to the Week 2 Personal Leadership Journal Rubric for grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work.
Questions about this assignment? Post them in the Contact the Instructor area. That way, everyone in the class will see and benefit from the instructor’s response.
By Day 7
Submit your Personal Leadership Journal.
In order to receive credit, all assignments are due by the deadline. Should you encounter an unanticipated and uncontrollable life event that may prevent you from meeting an assignment deadline, contact the Instructor immediately to request an extension. Your instructor’s contact information is in the Instructor area. For a full description of the late policy, please refer to the “Policies on Late Assignments” section of your Syllabus.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!