Disaster Mental Health Discussion Essay Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Disaster Mental Health Discussion Essay Paper
POST1-
This book is a great tool that gives people a great deal of optimism. Ripley (2009), makes me know how different I can react incases of any danger or death. The book makes me understand what makes a difference when one is between the matter of death and life. The most surprising thing with the book is the wisdom that the author has demonstrated on humanity. She exhibits a lot of elegance of her brains and resolves to solve the inadequacy of most of the revolutionary responses. The most comforting and fascinating thing is her discovery on the ability of the brain to perform the best with just minimal help.
There are a lot of things in the book that I have read and can influence me in what I do both in the present the future. For instance, bearing in mind that we live in a world confronted with unexpected natural calamities and crimes, as Ripley (2009) puts it, I am always in suspense over what I can do if, by chance, I am faced with any of such. The book makes me understand that if such happens, there is always luck based on one’s thinking. Therefore, a positive thought might lead me to do an action that saves me, while negative thinking can lead me to do an act that kills me even before the disaster hits on me. After the reading, I understand that one’s actions, if engulfed by fear, are more devastating. Therefore, I should try to avoid panic.
I have learned that, during an event of a disaster, people tend to act differently; some respond to the disaster based on the fear within themselves, and others respond based on courage that has always build within them. However, it is fascinating that one can act as a rescuer when in the same, they are hit by the disaster. This is represented by the story of Zedeno and Robert (Ripley, 2009). It is fascinating as one hopeless person who is determined to live can insert hope one another, one who is exceptionally pessimistic.
If I could share one thing with either a peer or a friend, the one thing would be hope through determination and optimism. I would always encourage such individuals to find hope as it is very much important when one is confronted with a disaster that puts them in a matter of life and death. I would tell them always to follow what their positive instincts tell them in such cases.
The Unthinkable makes me understand that positivity and help are very much paramount when one is confronted with a disaster. Through the use of the past stories about the people who had escaped the hazards, I am presented with a challenge to always have positivity in case I am confronted with any disaster of the kind. I am fascinated by the fact that one can examine their dark brain sides and get prepared in cases of any disaster. I would personally like to get my brain examined to determine how it would be if I am any kind of disaster.
References
Ripley, A. (2009). The unthinkable: Who survives when disaster strikes and why. Harmony.
POST 2 –
The book reflects on how each person has a different response to the uncertainty of a possible life and death situations. I enjoyed how Amanda Ripley dissects each probable reason from psychological studies; an individual can be calm and confident; meanwhile, others may display anxiety and hesitation when a disaster occurs. Is it through genetics, training, or traumatic experience that resulted in becoming competent or hopeless? It is still a mystery of what the reasons why individuals have created these skills and traits. One validation from the book, I agree, was how to overcome fear by developing yourself physically and mentally through training of becoming resilient. According to Ripley (2007), three areas tend to be characterized in this skill “a belief that they can influence life events, find meaningful purpose in life’s turmoil, and a conviction that they can learn from both positive and negative experiences” (p. 91).
Tommy Walker, a firefighter in Kansas City, Missouri, presented a great example of how a crowd can cause more complications while panicking. Walker and other people inside the restaurant heard an explosion underneath the basement, in which the crowd was frightened and quickly escaped to the front entrance. As the crowd stampede through the front entrance, Walker was calm and collective to examine his situational awareness. He noticed no visuals of smoke, fire, or threat, and remained at his table eating pizza. Once the restaurant was empty, Walker walked outside, finding an ambulance arrived on the scene, treating the crowd with minor injuries who panic. I can relate to Walker’s experience, where most of my responses are hazmat calls. It takes time to respond, protect, identify safely, and execute an incident action plan.
I learned a common reaction called paralysis, where an individual tends to freeze and feel impervious to pain when a significant event happens (Ripley, 2008). For instance, when the Virginia Tech shooting occurred, one student saw the gun come into the classroom’s doorway. The student froze during this time and delayed him to duck underneath the desk. It was difficult for the student wanting to escape but hindered his plan while the shooter was approaching the classroom. According to Gallup, paralysis has become a typical response during a life and death situation (Ripley, 2008). Individuals become overstimulated of all kinds of information, which creates a slow reaction to perform any task during critical events properly.
I would share with my peers or friends is to remain calm and collective. Panic is a virus that quickly spreads and consumes a person’s level of stress to become ineffective in performing a task. Therefore, a solution is to prepare and plan for any event to protect our loved ones.
Ripely, A. (2008). The unthinkable: Who survives when disaster strikes – and why. Three Rivers Press
POST3–
1.Reflect on this book and how it impacted you. What was surprising? What was confirming?
In the book, The Unthinkable the author, Amanda Ripley (2009), interviewed many people in a bid to explain how people respond and react to disasters. She concludes that most people follow three phases as follows. First, they deny that anything could be wrong. Second, they deliberate on the presenting options. Finally, they make decisions on what to do as well as what not to do. The findings presented by the author were surprising. For instance, the first phase, which is about denial, came as a surprise. How does a person deny a disaster when they can see it right in front of them? It means that there is a rapid moment when a person’s brain does not register and synthesize information in a normal way when a disaster happens.
2.Did anything you read influence you in the present or in terms of what you will do (or not do) in the future?
Ripley (2009) states that all the victims start in the same place and go through the three stages. Specifically, the denial phase, which usually takes the form of delay, can be fatal. The author has shown how it led to fatal outcomes during 9/11 and also through the account of a man who waited for Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. Being able to quickly overcome the initial shock, which leads to the denial phase, is highly essential. Overcoming the situation fast will allow me to get into the deliberation phase faster
3.What did you learn about how people react in a disaster event? Did anything surprise or fascinate you?
As learned from the book, people start in the same place and progress through three phases. The author has shown that the denial phase is critical as it might expose a person to more significant risks, especially in major disasters, such as hurricanes and terrorist attacks.
4.If you could share one thing with a loved one or peer, what would it be?
A loved one should understand the nature of the survival arc, which details how individuals respond to a disaster. Telling them about the three phases is crucial since it will inform them about how they should respond in the event of a disaster. It is worth sharing the accounts of the people who made the wrong decisions and, in return, put themselves in the way of harm, such as the man who waited for Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.
Reference
Ripley, A. (2009). The Unthinkable: Who survives when disaster strikes – and why. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.
Requirements:
1- write one response for each post at last 200 words
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!