Disadvantages of Radioactivity-Based Technology
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Disadvantages of Radioactivity-Based Technology
Report Assignment
Objective
The general purpose of the report is to explore the technological application of radioactivity in medicine. Specifically, you should discuss the benefits and disadvantages (risks) of using radioactivity-based technology as well as perform a life-cycle analysis of its application. To focus your report, should be on medicine.
Learning Outcomes
At the completion of the report, students should understand the following:
basic nuclear chemistry;
technological application of radioactivity; and
the benefits and disadvantages of radioactivity-based technology.
Research Report Investigative Questions
The person reading your report should be provided with clear answers to the following 3 questions:
What did you do?
How did you do it?
What did you find out?
Production, use, transport, storage regulatory control,
Hazard emergency response, benefits and disadvantages
Primary or bioproduction, life cycle assessment
Report Sections
The sections of a report should include:
Title Page
Abstract
Table of Contents
Introduction
Methods (Literature Review)
Results and Discussion
Conclusion
List of References
Appendices
Content Descriptions
Title Page – Carefully chosen words that succinctly describe the contents of the report. (1 page)
Abstract – A short, coherent paragraph, intelligible on its own that concisely answers the three-investigative questions listed above. (~ ½ page)
Table of Contents – A comprehensive list of all headings and sub-headings used in the report along with corresponding page numbers. A list of figures/illustrations and tables follows the table of contents. (1 page)
Introduction – The introduction of the report answers the following questions. (~ 1 page)
What question was being asked and why? (i.e., benefits and disadvantages of technology, life-cycle analysis)
What did you hope to learn from preparing the report?
Methods – A precise and concise account of the methods used to prepare your report and why you chose them. Let your reader know how you conducted the study and where you obtained your information. (~½ – ¾ page)
Results and Discussion – The results and discussion section of the report is the heart of your document and is the most likely to be read most thoroughly. (~ 1-½ pages)
Conclusion – The conclusion should summarize the most important aspects of your report and should be brief and to the point. (~ ½ page)
List of References – Cite references used in report.
Appendices – Material that is not essential and/or too long to be included in the main body of the report is placed in an appendix at the end of the report.
Information (“data”) Collection
Remember, applying the scientific method essential involves a systematic approach, and ideally a reproducible approach to information collection and interpretation.
General Requirements
The report should be between 4 – 5 double-spaced pages of text. Students must follow MRU’s APA for Academic Writing 2018/2019 guidance document for text, figures/illustrations, and tables.
Provide APA citations for any articles or references you might have used in the preparation of your critique.
Students must follow MRU’s APA for Academic Writing 2018/2019 guidance document for in-text citations and their reference list.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!