Digital and Writing Portfolio Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Digital and Writing Portfolio
Description
NO SOURCES ARE NEEDED. THE DIGITAL AND WRITING PORTFOLIOS CANNOT BE DONE IN MICROSOFT WORD. THEY MUST BE DONE USING PBS LEARNING MEDIA. WEEBLY OR OTHER DIGITAL MEDIA PLATFORMS.
NO PAGES NEED TO BE WRITTEN.
RDLT 544 Projects
Writing Instructional Resources Rubric
Candidates will locate materials for supporting effective writing instruction in a balanced literacy program across all levels. They will prepare an organized file of resource materials that include instructional strategies and activities, Internet resources, and other materials. Resources should be appropriate for use with students of diverse backgrounds and abilities.
There must be a minimum of 3 sections categorizing the portfolio. Sections/categories may include writing prompts, mentor texts, author resources, publishing possibilities, graphic organizers, etc. Each section/category will include 3-4 artifacts (minimum 10 artifacts total).
You will also prepare a 1-page overview/description of the writing portfolio. The 1-page overview will describe how the resources will help guide your writing instruction for diverse students.
NEGOTIATONS: Project-aligned, inclusive, or inquiry-guided.
Target
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Overview
5 pts
Orients viewer to the portfolio and describes how the resources will help guide your writing instruction for diverse students
Orients viewer to the portfolio OR mentions how the resources will help guide your writing instruction for diverse students
Missing or confusing overview
Materials Selected
10 pts
Materials for supporting effective writing instruction in a balanced literacy program include black line masters, instructional strategies and activities, internet resources, and other materials. Choice of materials reflects understanding of foundational theories and effective literacy instruction. Materials are designed to meaningfully support student learning.
Materials for supporting effective writing instruction in a balanced literacy program include a variety of types and formats. Materials are designed to meaningfully support student learning.
Materials selected lack variety and/or do not reflect thoughtful, meaningful support for student learning.
Considerations for all materials to be counted above:
Range of Materials
(50%)
Resource materials are appropriate for a wide range of levels (Reading Specialist candidates will have materials appropriate for levels K-12)
Resource materials represent a range of levels.
Resource materials are limited in levels represented.
Support for Diversity (25%)
Resource materials include appropriate materials for use with students of diverse backgrounds and abilities, including language differences.
Some materials include adaptations for diverse learners.
Consideration/appropriateness for diverse learners is inadequate or missing.
Conventions (25%)
Descriptions and materials are well organized and free of errors. Blacklines or examples are clear and copy-ready.
Descriptions and materials are well organized and free of errors.
Disorganization is evident and/or errors detract from the professional quality of resource materials.
Digital Portfolio
30 points
The purpose of this assignment is to help you create a digital portfolio of ideas, resources, and reflections on new literacies today. You may choose to create your “digital educational identity” as a public presence or private. Either way, you will get to use technology tools to read, write, and engage with that very technology.
o Create a digital portfolio using a multimedia application—either online or using an application/software
· Examples: One Note, Evernote, Weebly, PBS Learning Media, Pinterest, or other blog platform, wiki
o Create a resources section on your platform. These should have some system of organization and include at least 6 of the following 9 categories. Each category should have at least 3 hyperlinked resources with a brief (2-3 sentences) introduction/annotation:
1. Word Recognition
2. Fluency
3. Comprehension
4. Vocabulary/Word Study
5. Writing (this section should have 10 resources categorized into 3 sections)
6. Reading and Writing in the Disciplines
7. Motivating Reluctant Readers and Writers
8. Book Tie In (Students will choose a book they teach in their class or a book they like and find resources that would support themes and concepts within that book as paired passages or multimedia components.)
9. Ways to use technology (the following are some different kinds of resources you could include in this section)
· Transforming learning with technology
· Developing curriculum with technology
· Teaching information literacy and digital citizenship
· Fostering online learning with websites and apps
· Exploring problem solving with software, apps, and games
· Communicating and collaborating with social media
· Expressing creativity with multimedia technologies
· Promoting success for all students through technology
· Engaging students in performance assessment and reflective learning
o Blog/respond about using various (2-4) Web 2.0 tools
· Creating a blog/weebly/Evernote/OneNote
· Fill RSS feed blog reader
· Create a Twitter account
· Follow a Twitter meet up
· Use Google hangouts
· Create your own class wiki of resources
· Sign up and take a webinar on technology
· Use QR codes for educational purposes
· Sign up for podcasts/vodcast
· PDF annotation
· Online interactive whiteboards
· Try an online brainstorming/mind mapping applications
· Take a virtual field trip
· Explore/sign up for a MOOC or online course
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!