differentiate between e-marketing e-business and e-commerce
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Assignment Objectives:
Differentiate between e-marketing, e-business, and e-commerce.
Discuss the fundamentals of marketing and how they now apply to e-marketing.
You will want to think about the case analysis about MedEd, and CHC, to develop this assignment. Specifically, please speculate about how MedEd and CHC are possibly different in the three areas below:
What are differences in what is being done in some of the stages of the e-marketing program strategy process, between MedEd and CHC, as this case begins?
What are external marketing environment factors that differentiate the two schools?
How are the target market customer characteristics and consumption behaviors different?
Assignment Description:
Primary Task Response: Respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
E-Marketing Strategies
President Learner needs your help in grasping the e-marketing approach. He has e-mailed a request for three distinctions between the traditional marketing methods of his company and the online techniques of the e-business it is merging with.
Explain the following to President Learner:
- What are a couple of differences in MedEd versus CHC, in any of the stages of the e-marketing program strategy process used in this course, as the case begins? The e-marketing program strategy process has the following stages:
- Mission
- Critical Analysis/SWOT
- Target Market Sought
- Value Proposition(s)/University Brand Image(s) Desired
- Marketing Mix Specifics that Support Value Proposition(s)/University Brand Image(s) Desired
- What are external marketing environment factors that differentiate the two schools?
- How are the target market customer characteristics and consumption behaviors different?
Support your rationale by including Web links to at least 1 site for a traditional marketing company and 1 site for an online e-marketing company. The Web resources do not have to pertain to the health care market, but they should demonstrate the organization’s marketing strategy and approach.
Scenario:
Medical Education Academy (Med Ed) is a prominent, privately owned health care education institution that provides degree programs in nursing, medical technology, and health care administration in the United States. The company has built a positive reputation in the traditional on-campus education market for quality skills at an affordable price. Because of this institutional strategy, Med Ed has adopted the motto, “Quality skills with minimum bills.”
Now, however, to keep Med Ed’s motto and institutional operating model intact, President Will Learner, M.D., is planning to strengthen his academy’s health care education leadership while also reducing rising administrative expenses by acquiring an online health care education provider named Cyber-Health College (CHC). Cyber-Health College is a fully certified online health care education provider with a strong reputation among prospective students for relatively inexpensive, timely, and skill-intensive program completion. President Learner believes that Cyber-Health’s online programs will fit well with Med Ed’s institutional strategy because both educational providers emphasize quality skills and affordable prices.
You have been named to Med Ed’s newly formed digital learning initiative team (D-LIT). President Learner is relying on your e-business expertise to analyze Cyber-Health’s e-business and e-marketing fundamentals as well as to propose digital marketing strategy guidelines that will optimize Cyber-Health’s contribution to Med Ed’s strong reputation in the traditional health care education market.
Cyber-Health College was a pioneer in the online health care education market in the 1990s. Its founder and CEO, Lucy Vision, Ph.D., avoided the pitfalls of other dot-coms by building credibility with educational accreditation boards and developing intelligent agent software applications as a method of guiding student instruction without human faculty. Cyber-Health patented its med-teach agent technology using female voices and an embedded nurturing interface to gain student trust and build strong learning bonds. The educational press regularly commended Cyber-Health for designing a high-tech/high-touch instructional interface. Because of the strong, skill-intensive course learning and user-friendly, agent-driven interactive online instruction, Cyber-Health effectively positioned its medical education programs as “health care learning for the digital future.” However, this praise and online health care education success also drew its fair share of detractors. Faculty unions at medical programs and even other non-agent-driven online health care education programs criticized Cyber-Health for dehumanizing health care knowledge and medical education delivery.
The focus of your contribution to the newly formed D-LIT will be to highlight the potential of Cyber-Health’s e-business approach to complement Med Ed’s traditional health care education marketing strategy. Med Ed’s traditional marketing strategy relies on physical brick-and-mortar facilities, hard copy books and course resources, and human faculty instructors. In this traditional on-campus model, students attend physical classroom facilities for health care education, and traditional advertising media or promotional events are used to raise enrollment. By contrast, Cyber-Health’s online e-business education approach uses digital networks as the primary vehicle for delivering health care learning to students.
By accessing the Cyber-Health Web site and med-teach agent, students directly engage in autonomous, self-guided medical education coursework without going to a physical classroom facility and without human instructors. The med-teach agents employ artificial intelligence to progressively learn each student’s health care instructional needs and improve the student’s performance through skill-intensive virtual course project scenarios covering every aspect of traditional medical education. President Learner is keenly interested in your assessment of this futuristic online e-business model for delivering health care educational programs.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!