Different Forms of Leadership Styles in an Organization
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
You are encouraged to create a cover page, a table of contents, headings, and subheadings.
- Write this paper in third
- Double spaced
- APA format and citations
- Trait Leadership Theory: Trait leadership theory focuses on inherent leadership qualities and characteristics that determine a leader’s performance and effectiveness. Read this article for more information: Two Decades of Self-Leadership Theory and Research: Past Developments, Present Trends, and Future Possibilities
- Transactional Leadership Theory: Transactional leadership theory focuses on the transaction between leaders and followers that determines the leader’s performance and effectiveness. Read this article for more information: Transactional and Transformational Leadership: A Constructive/Developmental Analysis
- Transformational Leadership Theory: Transformational leadership theory focuses on changes in followers and organizations that determine a leader’s performance and effectiveness. Read this article for more information: Two Decades of Research and Development in Transformational Leadership
- Servant Leadership Theory: Servant leadership theory focuses on service in the development of followers and organizations to determine the leader’s performance and effectiveness. Read this article for more information: Servant Leadership: Its Origin, Development, and Application in Organization
- Situational Leadership Theory: Situational leadership theory focuses on the leader’s ability to adapt to various situations which determine the leader’s performance and effectiveness. Read this article for more information: Situational, Transformational, and Transactional Leadership and Leadership Development
- Participative Leadership Theory: Participative leadership theory focuses on the interactive and collaborative strategies for engagement that determine a leader’s performance and effectiveness. Read this article for more information: The Threshold Effect of Participative Leadership and the Role of Leader Information Sharing
- Organization Description
Describe an existing organization with which you have had personal experience and where you have either had direct access to a leader or have been able to observe a leader. Describe the organization’s objectives. The organization can be a for-profit or a nonprofit business, and you may represent any level of the organization (e.g., the team, department, division, or whole) in your analysis.
- You must change the name of the organization and employee names.
- Provide a detailed discussion of the organization.
- Discuss the history and background of the organization.
- Discuss the vision and mission of the organization.
- Discuss the purpose and objectives of the organization. Think of the goals, financial objectives, and strategic objectives of the organization.
- Provide citations where needed.
A1. Leader Practices
- In this section, you will provide specific descriptions of three leadership practices of the current leader. The current leader must be someone other than yourself.
- Provide specific examples that illustrate the practice.
- Cleary state the leaders title and (fictitious) name. The leader analyzed in A1 will be the same leader analyzed in C1, C2, and C3.
- Write a separate paragraph on each of the three practices.
Note: A leadership practice (or function) is different from a leadership theory. This section, A1, only discusses practice, not theory.
Example: One leadership practice of the CEO is to provide strategic leadership to the organization. In the performance of this responsibility, the CEO forms the organization’s vision and mission, while forming and implementing strategy. The value of strategic leadership is determining the organization’s direction by effectively managing the organization’s resources in pursuit of the organization’s vision. (This is a small draft of the leadership practice narrative. You are required to illustrate further how the individual performs the leadership responsibility and what value the responsibility provides to the organization).A2. Effects of Current Leader on Culture
In this section, discuss how the current leader of the organization has affected the culture based on his or her underlying beliefs, assumptions, and values.
A leader’s values and beliefs shape the culture of an organization. Organizational culture is defined as the underlying beliefs, assumptions, values, and ways of interacting that contribute to the unique social and psychological environment of an organization.
- Describe how the leader has affected the organization’s culture in a positive or negative manner.
- Provide examples to support your analysis.
- SWOT Analysis
In this section, conduct a SWOT analysis of the chosen organization. In this analysis please address the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to the organization. Remember, strengths are positive, weaknesses are negative, opportunities are unmet, and threats are unresolved.
- The SWOT Analysis should be at the same level of the organization used in the organization description from Section A (e.g., the team, department, division, or whole).
B1. Current Strengths
In this section, discuss two of the organization’s current strengths including specific details. Address how the strengths you identify have a positive impact on the organization.
- When assessing the strengths, think about the various functions such as finance, marketing, research and development, etc.
- Write a separate paragraph for each of the two strengths.
B2. Current Weaknesses
In this section, discuss two of the organization’s current weaknesses including specific details. Address how the weaknesses you identify have a negative impact on the organization.
- When assessing the weaknesses, think about the various functions such as finance, marketing, research and development, and so forth.
- Write a separate paragraph for each of the two weaknesses.
B3. Current Opportunities
In this section, discuss two of the organization’s current unmet opportunities, include specific details on how the opportunities have the potential to benefit or improve the organization.
- When assessing the opportunities, think about the various areas of potential benefit or improvement for the organization such as technology, human resources, finance, marketing, and so forth.
- Write a separate paragraph for each of the two opportunities.
B4. Current Threats
In this section, discuss two of the organization’s current unresolved threats. Include specific details on how the threats identified have the potential to threaten or harm the organization.
- When assessing the threats, think about the various areas of potential threat or harm such as technology, competitors, finance, government, and so forth.
- Write a separate paragraph for each of the two threats.
- Leadership Evaluation
In this section, perform a leadership analysis of your current leader’s top three strengths and weaknesses, and make three recommendations to improve his or her leadership effectiveness. Apply one theory to all three sections: C1, C2, and C3. The theory you choose should be different from the theory you chose in task one.
- Transformational leadership
- Transactional leadership
- Situational leadership
- Participative leadership
- Servant leadership
- Behavioral leadership
- Trait theory of leadership
C1. Strengths of the Current Leader
In this section, discuss three strengths of your chosen leader, describing in detail how the three strengths you identified align with the chosen scholarly leadership theory.
- This section of the task requires scholarly research.
- Provide specific examples to support each strength, and include at leastone in-text citation using a scholarly source.
- Write a separate paragraph for each of the three strengths.
Note: A scholarly source could be a reputable journal, a published book, any source from a business leader or university faculty member. Scholarly sources also include any article or book in the WGU library.
C2. Weaknesses of the Current Leader
In this section, discuss three weaknesses of your chosen leader, describing in detail how the three weaknesses that you identified align with the chosen scholarly leadership theory.
- This section of the task requires scholarly research.
- Use the same scholarly leadership theory you used in C1.
- Provide specific examples to support each weaknesses, and include at leastone in-text citation using a scholarly source.
- Write a separate paragraph for each of the three weaknesses.
C3. Recommendations for the Current Leader
Now that you have evaluated the current leaders’ strengths and weaknesses, recommend three specific actions, behaviors, or practices that would improve the current leader’s effectiveness in leading people and organizations. The recommendations address the current leaders identified leadership weaknesses and align with the chosen scholarly leadership theory.
- This section of the task requires scholarly research.
- Use the same scholarly leadership theory you used in C1.
- Provide specific examples to support each actionable item, and include at leastone in-text citation using scholarly source.
- Write a separate paragraph for each of the three recommendations.
D. Sources (Reference Page)
Your paper is required to include in-text citations that correlate to your reference page. All sources require a corresponding in-text citation and all in-text citations require a corresponding source on the reference page.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!