DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN GERMAN AND CANADA
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN GERMAN AND CANADA
Running head: DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN GERMAN AND CANADA 1
DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS IN GERMANY AND CANADA 5
Ledyan Corcho
Florida National University
Nursing Program
NUR 3655 – Culture in Nursing Practice
Prof. Eddie Cruz, RN MSN
February 12, 2018
German health care system is one of the most intensively developed health care systems after United States of America and Canada. In 2012 there was a reform on SHI (Social Health Insurance) Health Care Delivery Structure Act that focused on improving medical care in the murals whereas the Rural Physician Act and the
reform on Act to Reimburse Care focused on incorporating the psychiatric care into the diagnosis related groups. This was due to the rising of health care expenditures and rise of the non-wage labor costs which led to the freezing of employer’s share of SHI contributions. In 2013 Germany was ranked 7th in its population
weighted usage of therapeutic drugs in fourteen different classifications since it was on the basis of treatment of diseases with long term morbidity and led to high expenditures and it was it was considered the country with the highest number of dentists in Europe in 2015.
In 2013, the reforms that were announced by ministers back in 2004 to increase human resource, Aboriginal health, home care, primary health care, medical equipment, prevention, promotion and public health. To support the project the government enhanced cash transfer including yearly increment to the Canada Health
Transfer to 2014.
Whereas in Germany and Canada there is the single person payer system of health delivery which is utilized that is not same as in United States of America since they adopted the multiplayer system in which several stakeholders including the federal and state governments, companies are responsible for paying health care
providers. The heightened state of technology is among the greatest strengths of the U.S. Since babies who are born in the United States have a higher survival rate and also at attaining age 80 years and above the life expectancy is higher; this is not the case in Germany and Canada due to their level of technology.
DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN GERMAN AND CANADA
The cultural beliefs of the Canadians influences health in that there can be biasness in the provision of the care since care providers need to incorporate their beliefs into the diagnosis and this may affect the provision of quality care since you provide the care that they choose and not that which is needed. Demonstrating or
accepting a patient’s culture into the care can enhance provision of good care since they will feel they are respected and hence will cooperate more in the care provision process. Canada is a vast country with significant cultural differences across it regions. It became self-governing in 1867 and, in 1982, it severed its colonial
ties with Britain. However, Canada still retains its links with the Monarchy as a member of the Commonwealth of Nations.
The beliefs of the Germans influences health by causing diseases such as diabetes since they have a tradition of eating too much potatoes which causes rise in sugar levels in blood hence causing diabetes, this can’t be stopped since they have a notion of taking it a staple food hence its management and eradication
becomes a problem there by causing more harm to the people. In the case of German, Health insurance is mandatory for all citizens and permanent residents of Germany. It is provided by two systems, namely: competing, not-for-profit, nongovernmental health insurance funds (“sickness funds”—there were 118 as of January
2016) in the statutory health insurance (SHI) system; and substitutive private health insurance (PHI). States own most university hospitals, while municipalities play a role in public health activities and own about half of all hospital beds. However, the various levels of government have virtually no role in the direct financing or
delivery of health care.
References
Best, A., Greenhalgh, T., Lewis, S., Saul, J. E., Carroll, S., & Bitz, J. (2012). Large‐system transformation in health care: a realist review. The Milbank Quarterly, 90(3), 421-456.
Haux, R., Ammenwerth, E., Herzog, W., & Knaup, P. (2012). Health care in the information society. A prognosis for the year 2013. International journal of medical informatics, 66(1), 3-21.
Soyez, K. (2012). How national cultural values affect pro-environmental consumer behavior. International Marketing Review, 29(6), 623-646.
DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN GERMAN AND CANADA
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!