Developing Project Charter Case Study Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Developing Project Charter Case Study Essay
<Project Name> Revision: <6.0> Project Charter Date:
<Organization Name> <Organization Name>
<Full Name>
<Date>
<Name and authority of the sponsor or other person(s) authorizing the Project Charter>
<Project Name>
Project Charter
Revision <6.0>
<Note: The Project Charter is created during process 4.1 “Develop Project Charter” as described in A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). This template is derived from a sample template authored by the Project Management Institute (PMI): Document Code: PMBOK 4.1.3.1. Text in brackets and/or blue is designed to explain or define required content and meant to be deleted and replaced by your specific project information before submission. Make sure to update all portions (i.e. Table of Contents) with each submission.
The Project Charter is the document issued by the project initiator or sponsor that formally authorizes the existence of a project and provides the project manager with the authority to apply organizational resources to project activities. It documents the high-level information on the project and on the product, service or result the project is intended to satisfy.
The Project Charter is developed on the basis of the Business Documents, the Agreements on project implementation and other information like enterprise environmental factors and organizational process assets.
The Charter is developed by individual(s) external to the project, such as the sponsor, project management office (PMO) or the portfolio governing body. The project initiator or sponsor should be at a level that is appropriate to procure funding for the project. They either develop the Charter themselves or delegate this responsibility to the Project Manager. The initiator’s signature on the Project Charter authorizes the project.>
[Type here]
List of Changes
Date Revision Description Author <m/d/yyyy> <6.0> Publication for use <Author>
- Revision: The revision number of the document (the first digit is increased and the second one is set to zero if significant changes are made in the document; the second digit changes if the minor changes are made).
- Description: A detailed description of the revision and the amendments (for example, Publication for internal comments, Publication for use, Publication with changes in Chapter X, etc.).
- Author : Full name of the amendments’ author.
Table of Contents 1. General Provisions 4 2. Terms and Abbreviations Error! Bookmark not defined. 3. Project Purpose 4 4. Measurable Project Goals and Objectives 4 5. High-Level Project Description and Boundaries 5 6. High Level Requirements 5 7. Key Project Deliverables 6 8. Overall Project Risk 6 9. Summary Milestone Schedule 6 10. Preapproved Financial Resources 6 11. Key Stakeholder List 7 12. Project Approval Requirements/ Exit Criteria 7 13. Project Exit Criteria 7 14. Project Manager 7 15. Appendixes 7
<This section describes the general characteristics of this document folder and the set of documents to which it refers. These general provisions can be modified or supplemented in accordance with the particular project requirements.>
This document refers to the project “<Project Name>”, which is implemented by the organization “<Organization Name>”.
The Project Charter formulates the practical requirements and documents the high-level description of the product, service or other deliverable that should meet these requirements and will be result of the project.
The Project Charter is issued and signed by the Initiator or Sponsor of the project and formally legitimized the existence of the project. It provides the Project Manager with the authority to use the organizational assets in the project operations.
The approved Project Charter formally initiates the project.
If the project consists of several phases, the Charter can be updated to verify or improve the decisions taken during the previous iteration of the Project Charter development. In such a case the Charter is re-issued and signed as amended.
Terms, Notations, Abbreviations
<This section should contain the definitions of all terms and abbreviations required to properly interpret this document, arranged in alphabetical order. This information can be presented in the form of the following table, or as a reference to a Project Glossary in the Communications Management Plan.>
Term/Abbreviation Definition
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!