Developing Organizational Policies and Practices
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Developing Organizational Policies and Practices (NURS6053)
Employees want to fulfill own goals, and executives want to meet business goals, therefore there are competing needs in any firm. As a leader, you must create priorities and allocate resources properly in order to achieve these objectives.
The requirements of the labor, resources, and patients are frequently at odds in a healthcare context. Mandatory overtime, staffing ratios, the use of unlicensed assistance people, and employer reductions in education benefits are just a few examples of practices that may result in conflicting needs in practice.
Through policies, action, and inactivity, leaders can contribute to both the problem and the solution. In this Assignment, you’ll expand on the white paper you started in Module 1 by addressing competing needs inside your company.
How to Get Ready:
Review the national healthcare issue/stressor you looked at in your Module 1 Assignment. Review the analysis of the healthcare issue/stressor you selected (see attached document- WK2Assg Lopez Cordova-A.)
Choose two evidence-based academic resources that focus on recommended policies/practices to apply to your chosen healthcare issue/stressor and read them.
Instructions for the Assignment (4 pages):
Creating Policies and Procedures for the Organization
To the paper you submitted in Module 1, add a section. (See the accompanying document, WK2Assg Lopez Cordova-A, and add the four pages to it.)
The following should be addressed in the new section:
1. Identify and describe at least two competing requirements that are affecting the healthcare issue/stressor you’ve chosen.
2. Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that could have an impact on the healthcare issue or stressor you’ve chosen.
3. Examine the policy for ethical issues and discuss its benefits and drawbacks in terms of fostering ethics.
4. Recommend one or more policy or practice modifications to balance competing demands for resources, employees, and patients, while also addressing any ethical flaws in current practices. Give instances and be specific.
5. Provide two academic resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations. Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or policies.
**At least 5 references are required**
Developing Organizational Capacity is an assignment.
Practices and Policies
Employees in each firm have competing needs as they strive to fulfill their goals.
Leaders strive to achieve the company’s objectives. As a leader, you must be able to manage people effectively.
These objectives necessitate setting priorities and distributing resources appropriately.
During a
The personnel, resources, and patients’ requirements are all important in the healthcare context.
Frequently at odds. Mandatory overtime, the usage of staffing ratios, and the employment of
Employer decreases in education benefits and unlicensed assisting workers are two examples.
examples of good practice
ices that could lead to inconsistencies in practice
Through policy, action, and other means, leaders can contribute to both the problem and the solution.
as well as inaction You will continue to create the white paper you started in this assignment.
work on by address in Module 1
ing conflicting needs within your company
How to Get Ready:
Examine the national healthcare issue or stressor you looked at in your Assignment.
in the Module
1.
(See
a document is connected
–
WK2Assg Lope
z
Cordova
–
A.
)
and
Take a look at the analysis of the healthcare issue or stressor you choose.
Choose two pieces of evidence and examine them.
–
ba
Excellent academic resources with an emphasis on
recommended policies/practices to apply to the healthcare issue/stressor you’ve chosen.
The Challenge
Instructions
(4
pages):
Creating Policies and Procedures for the Organization
To the paper you submitted in Module 1, add a section.
(See
a document is connected
–
WK2Assg Lope
z
Cordova
–
A.
(Insert the four pages into this document.)
The following should be addressed in the new section:
1.
Determine and describe at least two competing needs that have an impact on your chosen topic.
Healthcare is a problem and a source of stress.
2.
Descr
ibe a relevant policy or practice at your company that could have an impact
your chosen healthcare problem or stressor
3.
Examine the policy for ethical issues.
factors to consider and
describe the policy’s advantages
and the difficulties in developing ethics
4.
One or more should be recommended.
Changes in policy or practice aimed at achieving a better balance
balancing competing resource, worker, and patient needs while addressing any issues
The existing policies have ethical flaws. Give instances and be specific.
5.
Cite research that supports the healthcare issue/strategy.
ressor and/or the ressor and/or the ressor and/or the
policies and procedures
to support your policy or practice, give two scholarly resources
recommendations.
**
A
a minimum of 5 references
**
Developing Organizational Capacity is an assignment.
Practices and Policies
Employees in each firm have competing needs as they strive to fulfill their goals.
Leaders strive to achieve the company’s objectives. As a leader, you must be able to manage people effectively.
These objectives necessitate setting priorities and distributing resources appropriately.
The staff, resources, and patients’ requirements are all important in a hospital facility.
Frequently at odds. Mandatory overtime, the usage of staffing ratios, and the employment of
Employer decreases in education benefits and unlicensed assisting workers are two examples.
examples of methods that may result in incompatible needs in practice
Through policy, action, and other means, leaders can contribute to both the problem and the solution.
as well as inaction You will continue to create the white paper you started in this assignment.
Work on handling competing needs within your organization in Module 1.
How to Get Ready:
Review the national healthcare issue or stressor that you looked at in your Assignment.
for the first module (See WK2Assg Lopez Cordova-A. document attached.)
Take a look at the analysis of the healthcare issue or stressor you choose.
Identify and evaluate two scholarly resources that are evidence-based and focused on
recommended policies/practices to apply to the healthcare issue/stressor you’ve chosen.
Instructions for the Assignment (4 pages):
Creating Policies and Procedures for the Organization
To the paper you submitted in Module 1, add a section. (Please see the attached document.)
Add the four pages to this document: WK2Assg Lopez Cordova-A.
The following should be addressed in the new section:
1. Determine and describe at least two competing needs that have an impact on your chosen topic.
Healthcare is a problem and a source of stress.
2. Describe a relevant policy or practice in your company that could have an impact.
your chosen healthcare problem or stressor
3. Explain the policy’s merits and weaknesses while critiquing it for ethical issues.
and the difficulties in developing ethics
4. Recommend one or more policy or practice modifications to bring the situation back into balance.
balancing competing resource, worker, and patient needs while addressing any issues
The existing policies have ethical flaws. Give instances and be specific.
5. Cite research that supports the healthcare issue/stressor and/or policies and procedures.
To support your policy or practice, give two scholarly resources
Recommendations.
**At least 5 references are required**
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!