Developing an Off-The-Job Training Program
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Developing an Off-The-Job Training Program
Develop an off-the-job training program that reflects the values of the company. The training program will include a summary lesson plan, demonstrated SMART objectives that align to the values of the position and the organization. The paper will include the relevant documents for off-the-job training including the summary lesson plan with SMART objectives and evaluation tools.
Off-The-Job Training Program
According to Saks & Account (2019), instructor-led learning has been declining due to the recognized need for development outside of a classroom environment. For a future business consultant at IBM, their roles will require being able to provide novel solutions to clients in various departments including project management, human resources and business analysis. The future employee will need a range of practical experience as well as continued learning of theoretical knowledge of business.
The employer should provide case studies about previous clients to provide answers on how they would have applied their knowledge. The instructor can then evaluate their answers in accordance with how the project was actually handled to determine whether the trainee is grasping business proceedings at IBM. Case studies encourage the trainee to think creatively and can cover a wide range of topics including strategy, management, marketing or human resources (Saks & Account, 2019). Innovative thinking, as valued by the company, can be fostered through allowing the candidate to apply their problem-solving skills independently.
Case Incidents are similar to case studies in that they require critical thinking about a real-life situation but have a narrower focus on a single topic (Saks & Account, 2019). This can be useful when the trainee is preparing for a project in a specific department and their supervisor wants to evaluate their knowledge in that department.
SMART objectives
For the Case Study & Case Incidents, the trainee must complete 3 case studies or case incidents in the first month of their job and achieve at least an 80% score on their case study, evaluated objectively based on the goals completed in the company’s actual project.
Summary Lesson Plan
The table below depicts the summary lesson plan for each activity used in the training program.
Table 1 Summary Lesson Plan table
Case Study & Case Incidents Programmed instructions Role playing Objectives Trainee must show critical analysis and apply personal experience or theoretical knowledge Trainees are asked a series of questions and are given a signal when they successfully answer each one (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021). Trainees take on roles and act out certain situations to assist them in better comprehending the learning ideas. Trainees behave as though they are confronted with a predicament and must solve it without prior direction or preparation (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021). Materials Electronic or Paper Case Study and Answer Sheet Off-the-job training may be carried out by training instructors using manuals or books (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021). Role playing, which is often reserved for customer service professions, entails trainees taking on roles and acting out certain situations. This technique of off-the-job training entails acting realistically in a simulated situation (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021). Length 4 weeks Ongoing Ongoing Trainee Responsibilities Research for well-rounded answer Return case study and answers to supervisor after completion
To successfully answer each of the series of questions given (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021). Role players must adapt fast to the ever-changing circumstances and react as they would in real life. Hiring, addressing a workplace problem, or making a sales pitch to a customer are examples of circumstances trainees may encounter (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021). Supervisor Responsibilities Evaluate answers based on company’s procedures, provide discussion for trainee, and identify areas for improvement Evaluate and assess the trainee’s understanding (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021). Evaluate and assess the trainee’s understanding to resolve the responsibilities of hiring, addressing a workplace problem, or making a sales pitch to a customer (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021). References
Saks, A. & Account, R. (2019). Managing Performance through Training and Development (8th Eds.). Top Hat – this is not the full citation got to fix it
Indeed, Editorial Team (2021). Off-the-job training: Methods and benefits. Indeed, Career Guide. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/starting-new-job/off-the-job-training
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!