Developing A Preliminary Juvenile Rehabilitation Program
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Developing A Preliminary Juvenile Rehabilitation Program
Program Analysis
The student should write a paper on a specific juvenile residential or institutional correctional rehabilitation program or develop a preliminary juvenile rehabilitation program covering all of the areas and questions noted on the syllabus outline for this assignment. Each section should be titled accordingly, i.e. Introduction, History and Scope of the Program, Description of Specific Program Elements, Community Reintegration, Strengths and Weaknesses of the Program and Summary and Conclusions.
The writing outline is included as an attachment.
Program Analysis Outline:
Introduction: Describe the purpose and scope of the paper. 10 points
History and Scope of the Program: Describe how the program is developed as well as identify its basic theoretical orientation, objectives, goals, and program elements. 15 points
Description of Specific Program Elements: This would include a description of each specific program element, the staff including their qualifications, duties and functions, and a description of the number and basic characteristics of residents in the program. A good question for the researcher to ask oneself is: “what is a typical day for the juvenile offender in this program?” Even placing a schedule of events and describing each one would be helpful.
Additionally, it is important to describe the tasks of each element in detail. For instance, if a juvenile has to go to individual counseling, what is done in this regard to help change criminal behavior and reduce recidivism? Also, any specifics of groups should be described, whether it is a behavior group, victim empathy group, living skills group, faith-based intervention, chemical dependency, or some sort of educational group. In the description of the program, it is important that the researcher identify how the behaviors of offenders are managed, i.e. what are the rules and consequences? (Be specific for specifically described behaviors).
How does the environment maintain safety? What is adequate supervision? What is the philosophy of safety? What are the security procedures and the system of rewards and sanctions? Is there a level system? If so, describe this and how decisions are made to progress in the level system.
What are the tools for youth to develop personal self-control over their behavior? How long is a typical stay in the program to reach the optimum treatment standards? Describe the educational program (GED etc.) and vocational skills development. Also, describe the religious element of the program, purpose, elements and how it is conducted. Are their specialized interventions for special needs youth (chemically dependent, emotionally disturbed, capital offenders, sex offenders etc.?) If so, describe. 15 points
Community Reintegration: How does the program provide for effective reintegration into the community? How does it provide follow-up support for maintaining progress? How does it facilitate youth becoming productive members of society? What further education/training, employment and help do youth receive? 15 points
Strengths and Weaknesses of the Program: Discuss the specific strengths of the program including the education and rehabilitative aspects indicating how the program is helpful. Provide reasons why certain elements are helpful including what research has found regarding the element in program effectiveness. Discuss the weaknesses of the program and, based on research and personal observation, show how the weaknesses may have not been helpful in other programs. Provide well thought out possible solutions for program enhancement taking into consideration costs. Staffing patterns and other criteria. 15 points
Summary and Conclusions: 10 points Briefly summarize your paper and discuss the program in light of effective program criterion mentioned in the text and other resources.
Reference Page: must include at least 2 peer-reviewed research based articles, and the textbook. 10 points
APA format: APA coverpage, general format (running head, page numbers), citations, etc. 10 points
|
Points Possible |
Points Achieved |
Introduction |
10 |
|
History and Scope of Program |
15 |
|
Description of Program Elements |
15 |
|
Community Reintegration |
15 |
|
Strengths & Weaknesses of Program |
15 |
|
Summary/Conclusion |
10 |
|
Reference Page |
10 |
|
APA format |
10 |
|
Total: |
100 |
|
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!