Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Description / paper instructions
384 Inclusive Design and Social ResponsibilityUnit 1 Project: The Nature of BarriersDue: Before the start of class, January 30st, 2020IntroductionEffective wayfinding and transportation options are important components of any college masterplan. In this project you will make decisions about what works, what needs improvement, and what you would keep or change if you were to design a wayfinding system to getonto and around the University of Toronto Mississauga campus.Each student will document and analyze the wayfinding systems on a specified route through the UTM Campus, and will propose at least one improvement to the existing wayfinding system. Objectives?To refine skills in critical analysis.?To explore the meanings and interpretations of campus environments.?To examine the social and political nature of architecture and design.?To consider the ways that architecture and planning impacts issues of diversity and vice versa.?To develop design processes and proposals for inclusive physical and visual environments.?To contribute to the environment in which you are living and working.ProjectAnalyze a specific assigned circulation path on the UTM Campus using the Principles of Inclusive Design. Develop a report that discusses bothyour analysis as well as provides proposals for improvement to ensure that campus passageways and roadways serve diverse populations.Approach to the ProjectFor background information, read the posted documents and presentations found in Week 2 of your SLATE site. You might also find the following short chapters helpful from the book entitled Universal Design New York 2:?Chapter 4: Using Circulation Systems ?Chapter 5: Entering and Exiting?Chapter 6: Wayfinding. An online pdf version of this book is available in Week 2 of your SLATE site.?Everyone will be asked to select a specific path or route. A sign-up sheet in google docs for routes will be posted to SLATE by the end of this week (January 12th).?Consider all 5 senses as you explore your assigned route. ?Travel the route at different times of the day and at times when congestion is high and low to best study the circulation patterns.?Bring a notebook, writing device and a camera to document yourwork. ?Remember to bring a copy of this project and show it to any officials/security guards who might question your activities. I have notified security but it is best to be cautious.?Photographically document your travel at three scales: less than human scale (micro), human scale (meso), and larger than human scale (macro). ?Note any aspects of the route that are of particular interest and present potential barriers. You should have 10 examples of these barriers.?Consider the way disability, age, gender, race, and class impact the way people navigate the route. ?Keep the Principles of Inclusive Design in mind when travelling on the path. Use them as a guide to analyze your experience (Refer to chart on last slide of Week 1 Lecture).Part 1: Record the followingGeneral Information?Date: Month, day, year and time of day?Level of congestion: Low or high?Location: Identify the path/route to which you are assigned include a map!Document your experience. Consider the following:?Overall impression ?Conditions of the routes?Multisensory wayfinding cues are there any??Clarity of circulation systems: Markers, nodes, edges, and zones/districts?Conditions of walkways/roadways surfaces?Demarcation for pedestrians, bicycles, and cars/buses?Pathway accessibility?Obstructions or barriers?Edges of pathways?Steps, ramps, and curbs?Pathway widths?Crossings?Traffic signals and signage?Signage (orientation, directional, destination ID, and situation/object ID)?Views?Aesthetic conditions?Plants and greenery?Places to get something to eat or drink?Places to people watch?Drainage?Clarity of public access and restriction?Bus stops/outdoor shelters?Seating and rest stops?Access to public amenities (garbage cans, drinking fountains, pay phones, restrooms, ATMs, etc.)?Congestion?Cleanliness?Lighting/illumination?Temperature?Sound/noise conditions?Tactile conditions?Safety issues?Comfort issues ?Entrances/exits?Elevators?Other items/issuesAnalyze your travel experiences. Describe the most positive and negative attributes and provide critical commentary to support your observations. Use the Principles of Inclusive Design to structure your analysis.Part 2: Develop a design solution that will improve the experience of travel on your route based on your critical commentary. Remember to use the Principles of Inclusive Design for this too! In designing a solution, make sure that you consider multiple senses. For example, how would a person who is blind understand your wayfinding system? Develop a conclusion that synthesizes your observations, analyses and design solutions. Project Requirements1.Prepare a comprehensive report of your experiences. Please ensure that it is a thorough representation of your experience and includes visual documentation as well as written documentation of the route.2.Please use outside sources to augment your report. Cite all your sources in APA format.3.Submit your assignment to the course drop box before the beginning of class.EvaluationYou will be evaluated on:?The quality of the documentation (examples/images/descriptions)?The quality of the analysis?The quality of your research?The quality of your written report?The quality of your design solutions?The quality of the conclusion.
Beside the instructions you will focuse more on the barrier perspective.all the material i gave you are supporting the you to write the topic number 8
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!