Design Thinking Process Course Paper
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Design Thinking Process Course Paper
Design, Thinking, Process, Course, Paper
To complete this assignment, you must:
1- Review the YouTube video
2-Research ONLY online videos on the design thinking process, then choose five (5) additional resources on that subject, BUT three (3) of those five MUST be in a language other than English.
HINT: You will find tons of videos on YouTube alone. I have also seen several great examples in Arabic, Hindi, and Spanish.
Part of my goal here is to get you out of your comfort zone when researching (search, lather, rinse, repeat when researching subjects), BUT also to emphasize similarities and differences between cultures and languages.
This assignment poses intriguing options for you with your international set. You could:
- Choose videos in a non-English language/language you don’t speak.
If I spoke only English, I could choose three in Arabic, three in Spanish, or some combo like one in Arabic, one in Spanish, one in Telugu.
- Choose videos in a non-English language or languages you do speak.
f I were bilingual in English and Spanish, I could choose three English for my national and three Spanish videos for my international set. If you are bilingual, you could also choose videos in a language you know and one or two in another language you don’t.
If I were bilingual in English and Spanish, for example, I could choose three in English, one in Spanish, and two in Arabic.
Regardless of whether you can speak that video’s language, you are looking for similarities and differences between your national and international sets. For example, you will see basic graphics and examples repeated in videos whatever language they use because they are explaining the same process/concept; however, you will also see differences that might surprise you.
3- Summarize your research (including the YouTube video I assigned in Step 1) in one (1) well-written paragraph addressed to me that includes:
- Links to my video and your five (5) sources formatted as those sources’ titles, NOT as their URLS.
* Documents (1) without links or (2) with links formatted as URLs will lose one letter grade.
- Effective rhetorical strategies, such as:
• Audience Awareness/You-attitude
• Direct Address
• Emphasis on Shared Goals, Perspectives, and Values
• Goodwill Ending/Stress on benefits
Remember you are talking to your boss here, but a boss who (1) knows about this proposal and (2) is receptive to your recs.
- Your recommendation that I incorporate your resources into my future classes’ review of the design thinking process.
4- After your summary paragraph, include a second paragraph that relates what you learned in the process of researching and writing this assignment.
This paragraph will feature items like your:
• Rationale (e.g. why you chose the videos you chose)
• Experiences (e.g. positive, negative, both)
• Assessment of this assignment for you personally and professionally. (I am creative person, social, familiar, bilingual, teamwork, problem solving, etc)
5- Include a correct and complete LOR (List of References) of all six (6) sources on the page AFTER your para.
* Documents without LORs will fail this assignment.
6- Format your doc using our class header style: Last name First initial Name of Assignment (on the left-hand margin) and the pagination using the X of Y formula (on the right-hand margin). If I were formatting my headers, I would do so like this model (assuming that my name aligns with the left-hand margin and my pagination with the right):
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!