David Cabanzon Case Study Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
David Cabanzon Case Study Assignment
English 2
Assignment 4
Introduction
Its 16:00 hours and the tone goes’ off at Ocean Reef Fire Department station 26. A large 100 ft vessel is on fire in the main channel with multiple victims on board. After the call crew members asses what could have been done better for the safety of the crew and care of the victims aboard the vessel. The need for a fire boat is quickly realized among the personnel at station 26. Due to the majority of the budget being spent on the need for more personnel to just handle regular day to day operations. The leftover money is not enough to purchase the desperately needed fire boat. With proper funding the Fire/EMS captain would purchase a fire boat capable of handling emergencies in the many channels, harbors, marinas, and surrounding waterways safely and effectively.
Body 1
As a fireman in an area surrounded by many waterways and boats. The needs to handle emergencies associated with marine environments becomes apparent. The problem comes when the available equipment, like a fire boat, is not available to keep first responders and victims of an incident safe. Ocean Reef Fire Department has 1 station, 3 rescues, 1 engine and a ladder truck. My departments territory has multiple complex canals, creeks, coves, and harbors. The 11 docks are home to vessels measuring up to 175ft. Ocean Reef is home to 1,700 marina slips and a large marina (“Ocean Reef FAQ”). A grant is the only option since funding was used to hire more personnel. With all things considered, something needs to be done about the ability to respond safely and effectively to marine emergencies.
Body 2
The solution to make marine emergencies safe for first responders and victims is a fire boat with a grant to purchase it. We can all agree that sending a fire truck to a structure fire at ocean reef is the safe and most effective option to handle that fire. Therefore, in a boat or marine fire at ocean reef the safest and logical apparatus to send is a fire boat. The capabilities of a fire boat don’t end at boat or marine fires. Medical emergencies at the many popular snorkeling destinations just miles away from ocean reef would be safely and effectively mitigated with a fire boat. The cabin of a firestorm 48 fire boat contains a patient berth that is able to handle medical emergencies. In addition, two parley 1750 gallon per minute pumps can produce 4000 gallons per minute of water to handle fires (“Firestorm 48”). The need for a fire boat is obvious and so is the need for the funds to get it. With a FEMA Assistance to Firefighters Grant we would be able to receive the proper funds. Marine emergencies for first responders and victims would be safer upon acquisition of this grant.
Conclusion
Proper equipment can save lives. The ability to handle boat and marina fires would be safer with the proper equipment. Medical emergencies just miles away from land would also be possible with the proper equipment. After acquiring a fire boat, first responders would be able to carry out boat and marina fires safely. With the addition of a fire boat medical emergencies miles from land would become more effective and response times to these emergencies would improve drastically. With a fire boat, first responders will be able to respond to emergencies in the many waterways that surround the department safely and effectively. When the tone goes off for a large vessel on fire with multiple victims onboard the fire boat at station 26 will be ready to respond.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!