Cybersecurity in Business Essay Assignment Help
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Cybersecurity in Business Essay Assignment Help
Cyber White Paper 1
Cyber White Paper 4
Cyber White Paper
RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Cybersecurity in business
Introduction
Because of today’s international economy, securing a company’s intellectual property, financial information, and good name is critical for the company’s long-term survival and growth. However, with the rise in risks and cyber vulnerability, most businesses find it difficult to keep up with the competition. Since their inception, most companies have reported 16% fraud, 37.7% financial losses, and an average of over 11% share value loss, according to data compiled by the US security agencies[footnoteRef:1]. Most corporations and governments are working hard to keep their customers and residents safe from harm. There are both physical and cybersecurity risks involved with these threats. According to a recent study, the vast majority of company owners aren’t aware of the full scope of cybersecurity. People who own their businesses must deal with various issues daily. Nevertheless, steps are being taken to address these issues. Customers and the company are likely to be protected by the measures adopted. Cybersecurity is one of the most pressing issues facing organizations in today’s society. Leaks of a company’s intellectual property and other secrets may have devastating effects on its operations, as competitors and rivals will do all in their power to stop them[footnoteRef:2]. Equifax is an excellent illustration of this. This is perhaps the most talked-about security compromise of the yea[footnoteRef:3] r. The firm was severely damaged because of this. [1: “Database security attacks and control methods.”] [2: “Comprehending the IoT cyber threat landscape: A data dimensionality reduction technique to infer and characterize Internet-scale IoT probing campaigns.”] [3: “The Equifax data breach: What caps and firms need to know now.”]
Some individuals take advantage of clients by stealing highly important information to profit financially from their actions. For example, if the wrong individuals get their hands on your credit card information, you’re in serious trouble since you might lose money. Some families lose all of their resources, while others are forced to declare bankruptcy after being financially stable for a long period. Many of the findings of this study will be focused on cybersecurity and the sources of cybersecurity risks. The paper outlines a few of the issues and solutions that organizations may use to keep their operations and consumers safe from exploiting dishonest individuals.
Research question
According to the most recent study, more than 1500 companies have been exposed to some cybersecurity assault[footnoteRef:4]. This research details the specific types of attacks that have occurred. Organizational operations are affected, as is corporate governance, and the internal management of financial status is rendered ineffective due to these assaults. The question that will be investigated during the study is: [4: “Towards blockchain-based identity and access management for internet of things in enterprises.”]
How does a company’s performance suffer because of cybersecurity, and What are the best practices for enhancing cybersecurity in business?
Purpose statement
Today’s IT environment is diverse, dispersed, and cross-border in scope. As a result, it isn’t easy to keep track of user identities across many platforms. Because identity mistakes may be very expensive, it’s critical to correctly federate identities using security technologies that provide a business the control and security it needs. For example, an organization’s intellectual property and its secrets are very important. If the rivals get their hands on them, they may easily bring the company to its knees. Theft and resale of company data are common occurrences. Cybercriminals have stolen large amounts of data from several firms. Therefore, an organization must understand how these attacks are carried out and use the recommended measures to prevent these attacks.
Businesses and their customers’ intellectual property rights are at risk from various sources when it comes to cybersecurity risks. Threats to enterprise security may come from various places, including the ones listed below. “The Bot Network operating system, which is used to spread phishing programs and other malware, is the first to utilize remote-controlled operations to conduct attacks” [footnoteRef:5]. Underground marketplaces are the most commonplace to find these networks. In addition, criminals who organize assaults for financial gain pose a concern. In this situation, spam and other malware programs steal personal information, conduct online fraud, and manipulate computers[footnoteRef:6]. Businesses and governments are put at risk because of the ability to conduct commercial espionage wielded by certain criminal organizations and global corporate spies. [5: “The DODAS Experience on the EGI Federated Cloud.”] [6: “Security and Privacy in Communication Networks”]
Also, hackers have long been acknowledged to represent a significant threat to a firm’s cybersecurity. For various motives, such as vengeance, financial gain, or even political aspirations, these organizations break into networks without authorization. Because they use attack scripts and other internet protocols to get into the targeted websites, getting into a company’s system without going via the normal channels involves a lot of technical know-how. Such individuals are a significant hindrance to a company’s development and a threat to the privacy of its customers[footnoteRef:7]. An insider danger to a company’s cyber security is also a possibility. Because of their experience, these people don’t need to be computer experts to access the company’s network and inflict damage by changing and stealing data. Contractors and other low-skilled staff are the most dangerous insiders since they may unintentionally inject malware into the system. [7: “Intellectual property—The Foundation of Innovation: A scientist’s guide to intellectual property.”]
Research methodology: Quantitative method
According to the information presented in the introduction, cybersecurity is a complicated problem, and a wide range of strategies will be used to gather data. It will be difficult to obtain and filter information on corporate security since most companies either deny or are unaware of the cyber risks. A large amount of information is released each year by the US Department of Defense about cybersecurity goals and procedures. Thus, this official data will help establish a quantitative foundation for corporate security.
Through interviews, we will gather more quantitative data. Security experts and others suspected of posing a cyber security danger will focus on the first interview. Participants for the interview will be recruited using a combination of traditional methods such as word-of-mouth and specialized websites and seminars. Businesses from a wide range of demographics will be notified about their involvement in an interview assessing the current state of cybersecurity. None of the information listed above will be discussed during the interview to prevent bias in favor of the research questions. Instead, questions on dangers and targeted groups will be left unanswered so that participants may express their views based on their own experiences. The research will go on to hypothesis testing after the required quantitative data has been gathered from the study of business organizations. Search engines like Google Scholar or others may be used to locate information and publications gathered by other scholars on cybersecurity.
Putting all of this information together will provide you with the raw data you need to do your study. Before analyzing the data, it will first be sorted into perceptions of the truth, the deficiencies, and even conclusions. The comparison of diverse perspectives will be made easier by categorizing them. The survey will examine the perceptions of businesses and hackers. Interviews and other relevant organizations will be used to get the data. As for truth, it will focus on what data tells us about the security of corporate enterprises. The flaws will serve as a basis for contrasting what’s true with what people think they see.
Conclusion
Cybersecurity is a prominent concern both nationally and worldwide to safeguard consumers and companies. Information security, government service delivery, and defense measures must be developed due to the surge in cybercrime. Proper procedures should be in place to help respond promptly in the event of a cyber-attack. According to a recent survey, cyberattacks have cost many people and companies much money. Some individuals have gone broke because of cyber thieves stealing from their bank accounts, and others have lost all their fortunes. As a result, governments throughout the world must act to establish systems, laws, and regulations to combat cybercrime[footnoteRef:8]. Most nations have seen income declines and an increase in cyber-attacks due to their failure to educate their citizens about the dangers of such assaults. The people of these nations should be educated on how to protect themselves against cyberattacks and defend themselves if one occurs. [8: “Improving the business processes management from the knowledge management.”]
Work cited
Lin, Xuedong, Ali Ghorbanifar, Koi Ren, Sensum Zhu, and Airing Zhang, eds. Security and Privacy in Communication Networks: Secure COMM 2017 International Workshops, ATCS and Esprit, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, October 22–25, 2017, Proceedings. Vol. 239. Springer, 2018.
Malik, Mubina, and Trisha Patel. “Database security attacks and control methods.” International Journal of Information 6, no. 1/2 (2016): 175-183.
Nuss, Martin, Alexander Puchta, and Michael Kunz. “Towards blockchain-based identity and access management for internet of things in enterprises.” In International Conference on Trust and Privacy in Digital Business, pp. 167-181. Springer, Cham, 2018.
Spiga, Daniele, Enol Fernandez, Vincenzo Spinoso, Diego Ciangottini, Mirco Tracolli, Giacinto Donvito, Marica Antonacci et al. “The DODAS Experience on the EGI Federated Cloud.” In EPJ Web of Conferences, vol. 245, p. 07033. EDP Sciences, 2020.
Tabares, Marta S., Liliana Giraldo, and Luis Joyanes. “Improving the business processes management from the knowledge management.” In Proceedings of the The 11th International Knowledge Management in Organizations Conference on The Changing Face of Knowledge Management Impacting Society, pp. 1-8. 2016.
Pour, Morteza Safaei, Elias Bou-Harb, Kavita Varma, Nataliia Neshenko, Dimitris A. Pados, and Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo. “Comprehending the IoT cyber threat landscape: A data dimensionality reduction technique to infer and characterize Internet-scale IoT probing campaigns.” Digital Investigation 28 (2019): S40-S49.
Primoff, Walter, and Sidney Kess. “The equifax data breach: What cpas and firms need to know now.” The CPA Journal 87, no. 12 (2017): 14-17.
Poticha, David, and Mark W. Duncan. “Intellectual property—The Foundation of Innovation: A scientist’s guide to intellectual property.” Journal of Mass Spectrometry 54, no. 3 (2019): 288-300.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!