cultural awareness or geographic targeting
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
cultural awareness or geographic targeting
Jamie Wrote:
What would go wrong if a firm only sources recruits using one method?
Firms using only one method of sources to recruit can lead to firms not potentially finding the right candidates for the open positions needing to filled. “Sourcing is done to identify and locate high-potential people who will later be recruited by the firm” (Phillips & Gully, 2015). Also if a firm used only one method of sourcing, there’s no heavy flow of candidates with the best qualifications to apply for the job. Firm’s like the competitiveness of having multiple candidates interested in their company. Being able to compare a group of resumes can also allow employers to see who has potential to move on in the application process (I.e. interview process).
How might a company’s preferred recruiting sources differs when it is looking for local managers versus doing a national search for managerial talent?
Any company preferring to use certain recruiting sources when it comes to managerial, is doing so because of the role, the qualifications and requirements. Using a specific date base can narrow down candidates with the best resumes, candidates that are either in a managerial role currently or have had experience within this role.
Miriam Wrote:
1) What could go wrong if a firm only sources recruits using one method?
Depending on the size of your company and the job you are looking for will depend on your sourcing strategy. If the company is real small, below 25 people, maybe using one method is OK (barely). For the most part, a company would need to use multiple sourcing strategies in order to fill their position. The bad thing about only using one source method is that you may not get the quantity or quality you are looking for. You would limit yourself to finding the best candidate. The pool may be small or the tools the source have may not be enough to help you pull the right type of candidates. If you need to source quickly, then this may be ok but depending on the company’s goals, the staffing goals and talent needed, then the “importance of different staffing goals influenced the prioritization of different recruiting sources,” which is give you the best options to filling your position (Phillips and Gully, Strategic Staffing, 2015, pg. 162). In some cases if you know the audience you are trying to attract and know where to look for them and that you will get a good pool of candidates from it, then maybe it will work. But most of the time recruiters want a high-volume of applicants to apply and they can weed out the ones that has more quality. Time may also be a factor. By using one method, may take a longer time to find the right candidate due to limitations.
2) How might a company’s preferred recruiting sources differ when it is looking for local managers versus doing a national search for managerial talent?
Again, this is based on the type of company one may have. If the company is nationwide or on a global base, then doing a national search might be preferred because you may want someone that knows the pros and cons, laws, etc. of different locations. However, if you are on a smaller scale or only local, then hiring a local candidate would be preferred. Just depends on what the goal of the position is. There are different factors to consider such as cultural awareness or geographic targeting.
Phillips, J., & Gully, S. (2015). Strategic staffing. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!