CTUO Community Development Response Discussion
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
CTUO Community Development Response Discussion
I’m studying for my Communications class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?
Respond to two peers’ initial posts with additional strategies that would be helpful in maintaining ethics in a community collaboration.
Student post down below:
Ethical issues for consideration in community collaboration includes: the macro and micro contexts of ethics. The macro contexts of ethics deal with the public sector; “In the public sphere, ordinary citizens (as opposed to elected lawmakers) come together to debate policy, law, and other items of interest to society (Heath & Isbell, 2017).” The micro contexts of ethics deal with communication and decision making. This means that each ethical situation will be viewed individually and not as a one size (law) fits all. “In other words, prescriptions will not fully suffice to guide stakeholders to handle ethical dilemmas because each dilemma is unique. Many scholars believe it would be unethical to prescribe a moral code because moral codes are situated, cultural, and contingent (Heath & Isbell, 2017).” To support ethical conduct in the macro and micro context, there must be trust, respect, honesty, understanding and the ability to effectively communicate with each other. Organizations that collaborate must have these things in order to make the program work and accomplish the mission. They must also be able to hold each other accountable. “Tony Giddens argues that ‘to be accountable for one’s activities is to explicate the reasons for them and supply the normative grounds whereby they may be justified’ (Giddens, 1984, p. 30 as cited in Glasby & Dickinson, 2013).”
CTUO Community Development Response Discussion
Question Description
I’m studying for my Communications class and need an explanation.
Respond to two peers’ initial posts with additional strategies that would be helpful in maintaining ethics in a community collaboration.
Student post down below:
According to (Isbell, 2017) a pragmatic reason to embrace a collaborative ethic is that it will as the basis for building social capital. Author reports reciprocity can be short term and contingent (“I will if you will”) or long term and rooted in a sociological understanding of obligation. Organization that have different agenda can be an ethical issue. If individual have higher education may try to discount other options and this can be an ethical issue. It will be important that people are on committees that are objective and should not be benefiting from the collaboration.
According to (Isbell, 2017) Ann Marie Thomson and James Perry identify norms of trust and reciprocitytrust build, and trust in collaboration is linked to other important outcomes such as social capital and sustainability. Author reports trust in collaboration is loosely defined as associated with ethical interaction that is composed of respect, understanding, listening to others, empathy toward diverse perspectives, commitment to the partnership, predictability, dependability, and transparency.
According to (Isbell,2017) grounding communication processes in ethics facilitates shared decision making. Author reports through the principles of reciprocity and symmetry, stakeholders create methods for participating and decision making that level the playing field. I thought about King Arthur and his knight of the round table. King Arthur made his table round because everyone at his table has a voice. I would want to create the same environment as the team leader.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!