Critical Review of World Music
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Critical Review of World
MUS 2433 Writing Assignment:
Critical Review of “World Music” Recording Choose either Topic A or Topic B.
• Suggested length: 3 pages or 600 words.
• Final Paper Due in Module 5
• Completion Time: Final draft – 4 hours.
Topic A:
A defining feature of “world music,” “world beat,” or “ethno-pop,” as it has variously been called, is the production of recordings by
well-known American and European pop musicians that include traditional musicians from other cultures performing in a back-up role, or that call attention to themselves by the use of musical exotica extracted from traditional cultures. Such recordings
suggest a range of issues and questions that invite critique and debate. Some of these are listed below:
1. How do a recording’s musical arrangements, title, graphics, and accompanying notes represent the relationship between
Western lead musicians and participating traditional musicians?
2. Is music on the recording attributed to an author, composer, or arranger? Who holds the copyright? What do attributions and credits suggest about rights to, and ownership of, the music?
3. Are the musical and personal relationships negotiated through the production of the album compatible with beliefs about
rights to, and ownership of, music in the imported tradition represented on the recording?
4. Does the lead artist show musical respect for the imported tradition(s) represented on the recording? What is “musical
respect” and how might it be shown or not shown?
5. Do artists who employ traditional musicians have obligations not only to the musicians but to the political entities or cultural
traditions that they represent? What factors would determine whether they do or do not?
6. Should traditional musicians be implicated in the capitalist culture of risk that is an inherent part of the record business? That
is, should traditional musicians get Page 2 of 5 a fixed “session” fee for participating in a recording, or should they be paid
royalties based on sales?
7. Are cross-cultural “world music” and “world beat” projects inherently opportunistic and exploitative?
The Assignment:
Choose either a recording from the attached list or a recording not on the list that meets the criteria of “a cross-cultural fusion in
which Western musicians work with artists or musical material from traditions different than their own.” If you choose a recording not on the list, please let me know what it is before you begin your work.
Write a critical review of the recording in which you do the following:
1. Offer a concise description of the musical and aesthetic concept behind the recording, or answer the question, “What did the
artists or producers set out to do?”
2. Discuss the way in which “roots” music is incorporated into the musical sound.
3. Discuss musical, aesthetics, and ethical issues that the recording raises, taking into account the list provided above. Think
about the relationship between aesthetics (what is beauty?) and ethics (what is good?). You are welcome to consider issues on
the list provided above as well as issues not on the list.
4. Offer your critical judgment about ways in which the project succeeds or fails as music and as an exercise in developing
cross-cultural understanding and relationships.
Topic A: Suggested Recordings:
• Paul Simon, “The Rhythm of the Saints” (with Latin American musicians). • David Byrne, “Rei Momo” (with Latin American
musicians)
• Peter Gabriel, “Passion” (created for the soundtrack to “The Last Temptation of Christ” based on Middle Eastern Music); (may
discuss together with Gabriel’s “Passion Sources”)
• Kate Bush, “The Sensual World” (with Bulgarian women) • Mickey Hart, “Planet Drum” and “At the Edge”
(“world percussion”) • Paul Winter, “Earthbeat” (jazz and Russian village music)
• Outback: “Dance the Devil Away” and “Baka” (Aboriginal music combined with folk guitar)
• “Spirit of the Forest” (Baka Beyond) jam sessions with Baka Pygmies and composer/guitarist Martin Cradick
• Linda Ronstadt, “Canciones de mi padre” (with Mexican and Mexican-American musicians) Page 3 of 5
• Talking Heads, “Reamin in Light” (appropriation of scratch, funk, Afro-Beat and jùjú rhythm)
• “A World out of Time” Vols. 1 and 2 (Pop/avant-garde guitarists Henry Kaiser and David Lindley join musicians in Madagascar)
• “Talking Timbuktu” (Guitarist Ry Cooder grooves with griots from the Sahara)
• Robbie Robertson and the Red Road Ensemble, “Music for the Native Americans”
• “The Sweet Sunny North” (avant-garde musicians Henry Kaiser and David Lindley jam with traditional musicians in Norway)
• Paul Simon, “Graceland”
• Robert Plant and Jimmy Page, “No Quarter.” (collaboration with musicians from Egypt)
Topic B:
The mirror image of the “world music” phenomenon described in Topic A is the appropriation of Western musical instruments,
sounds, structures, and styles by musicians whose cultural origins are outside the West. Recording by such musicians — also
frequently referred to generically as “world beat,” “ethno pop,” or “world pop” — raise issues that are the obverse of those listed
under topic A. For example:
1. Do musicians from non-Western cultures tend to sell their own musical traditions short when they merge these traditions with Western styles and techniques, usually in a pop or jazz groove?
2. Can music remain “traditional” while incorporating elements of Western musical modernity? What are the criteria for
classification as “traditional” music?
3. Does the commercial success of fusion recordings tend to undermine the cultural authority of more traditional musicians in
the non-Western countries from which these projects emerge?
4. Do these projects tend to produce music that wears well with time, or does the music appear in hindsight to have been
slapped together quickly as a response to the music industry’s hunger for fads and novelty?
5. Even though native musicians are ostensibly in control of the projects, do they invariably end up being exploited by the
entertainment business? (i.e., recruited, recorded, and rejected as soon as they fail to meet marketing goals).
The Assignment:
Choose a recording from the attached list or a recording not on the list that meets the following criteria (if the recording you
choose is not on the list, please let me know what it is): Page 4 of 5 • The featured artist is either from outside the United States
or has musical roots in a style or repertory outside mainstream American music (e.g., jazz, blues, pop, Anglo folk). • The
recording merges elements of traditional ethnic music with more mainstream musical styles and structures. Write a critical
review of the recording in which you:
1. Offer a concise description of the musical project presented on the recording.
2. Explain how the resources of Western musical traditions (e.g., instruments, styles, textures, cultural references, recording
techniques) are merged with those of the featured non-Western tradition(s).
3. Discuss musical, aesthetic, and ethical issues that the recording raises, taking into account the list provided above.
4. Offer your critical judgment about ways in which the project succeeds or fails as music and as an exercise in developing
cross-cultural understanding and relationships.
Topic B: Suggested Recordings:
• The Ravi Shankar Project: Tana Mara (a fusion of Indian raga, the technology of synthesizers and digital sampling keyboards,
and Western popular music. Vocalists include George Harrison)
• Sheila Chandra (a fusion between Indian classical and film music and English pop)
• Ofra Haza: “Kirya” and “Fifty Gates of Wisdom” (Yemenite Jewish songs performed in a pop style)
• R. Carlos Nakai: “Feather, Stone & Light” (New Age Native American music featuring flutist R. Carlos Nakai, guitar player William Easton, and percussionist Will Clipman)
• King Sunny Ade and his African Beats: “Juju Music” and “The Return of the Juju King” (“Afro-Pop”)
• Ebenezer Obey: “Get Yer Jujus Out” (“Afro-Pop”) • Baaba Maal “Firin’ in Fouta” (“Afro-Pop”)
• Yat Kha, “Yenisei Punk” (Tuvan “techno-ethnic-acid-folk music”)
• Shakti, “The Best of Shakti” with John McLaughlin, Shankar, Zakir Hussain, T.H. Vinayakram (fusion of Indian classical music and jazz)
• Deep Forest, “Boheme” (samplings of music from Transylvania)
• “Deep Forest” (samplings of pygmy music)
• “Dead Man Walking” soundtrack album: cuts by Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan with Eddie Vedder [see me for source recordings of Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan] Page 5 of 5
• The Bulgarian Voices “Angelite” Featuring Huun-Huur-Tu and Sergei Starostin, “Fly, Fly My Sadness” (Bulgarian female choir joins forces with Tuvan overtone singers)
• “Planet Soup: A Stirring Collection of Cross-Cultural Collaborations and Musical Hybrids” [3 CDs] (from the liner notes: “Three hours of compelling global music created by over 200 musicians in over 35 countries)
Critical Review of World
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!