Critical Literature Review of an Educational Problem
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Description
4 page Part 1 | Introduction addressing each of the bullet points
Description of the problem
*Identifies and describes an educational problem
*Provides enough detail so the reader can understand the problem in its social, institutional, and organizational contexts
*Describes how the problem reflects social inequity in and/or through schooling
Positionality
*Describes how the author became aware of the problem and how their understanding has evolved over time*Discusses how their social location with regard to identity influences their view of the issue
*Articulates an image of resolution of the problem and discusses. the underlying view of equity and justice in that image
Theoretical Fit
*Articulates how a critical investigation of this problem can illuminate or generate new and important understandings
*Briefly connects dimensions of the problem to broader themes or concepts in critical social theory tradition; provides justification for applying a critical theoretical framework to the literature about the problemDriving Questions
*Concludes the introduction with a driving question or set of driving questions that give focus and purpose to the literature review
*States the driving question(s) that are clear, concise, and open-ended (avoids yes or no questions)
*Poses driving questions that are a seamless extension of the ideas in the introduction4 Page Part II | Theoretical Framework
Description of the theoretical framework
*Outlines a framework of ideas related to the problem and derived from critical theoretical frameworks
*Provides a brief historical context to the framework
*Introduces key ideas and scholars associated with the framework
Assumptions and Guiding Questions for the Literature*Breaks the framework down into its most salient components (principles, assumptions, tenets, etc.); explains each component clearly
*Provides visuals to support the reader’s understanding of the framework (table, figure, etc.)
*Links individual components to dimensions of the problem
*Articulates a question or set of questions to ask the literature representing each of the framework’s tenets, principles, or assumptions
3 Page Part III | Method*Provides a brief summary of keyword searches, including which terms were used and in which search engines, a description or count of the results, and a brief explanation of how these inquiries led to the final keyword terms.
*Summarizes the final search results in terms of total publications and types of publications (journal articles (empirical or theoretical pieces), books, book chapters, reports, videos, etc.)
*Describes the rationale/ protocol for selecting scholarly works to review (Which did you select to review and why? Explain.)*Summarizes the uniform process (review protocol) through which each piece of scholarship was analyzed in response to the driving question in the Introduction and the guiding questions in the Theoretical Framework portions of the literature review.
5 Page Part IV | AnalysisDescription of the Evidence Base
Describes the broader evidence base captured in the literature review. For instance, is it a mature body of scholarship with clear set of principles, findings, outcomes, etc.? Or is it a young topic that has little scholarship associated with it?
Distillation of Discussions, Themes, and Patterns in the Literature
Provides the reader with a broader context for understanding the landscape of the literature
Lists and discusses key topics, themes, patterns, discussions, conflicts, etc. from the literature
Identifies key scholars, social movements and contexts, and methodologies that drive the existing literatureDistills the predominant theoretical orientations in the literature
5 Page Part V | Findings and ImplicationsSummary of Key Ideas Relevant to Driving Questions
● Revisits the driving question(s) from the Introduction section and provides an answer to the question(s) that builds from the analysis of the literature in the previous section, Analysis
● If possible, articulates a set of key themes, observations, or recommendations (i.e. for policy or practice)
Discussion of why this analysis matters
● Explains why the critical inquiry is important.
● Where relevant, discusses existing gaps in the literature uncovered by this review, conceptualizes important research this project points to, and/or urges changes in policy and/or practice regarding the central problem you take up in the literature review.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
|