Critical factors affecting the planning and implementation of major projects
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Critical factors affecting the planning and implementation of major projects
This module addresses your implementation plan through four perspectives: the physical and technological resources required for your concept or idea, the implementation schedule for your concept or idea, a method to review the process and indicators of success, and the link between the implementation of your plan and entrepreneurship or intrapreneurship. These perspectives are not the only framework for implementation, but rather one of many suitable frameworks.
As an example of one such implementation framework, Nystrom (2012) outlines a two-step framework that combines resources and knowledge for successful implementation. In this conception, resources include “physical assets, financial assets, and human assets” that leaders then combine with knowledge to implement concepts or ideas (p. 175). In contrast, Ciabuschi, Perna, and Snehota (2012) stratify resources into “tangible, intangible, human, technological, and financial” (p. 221). In the former framework, implementation planning moves according to the type of asset. In the latter conception, implementation planning also captures both tangible and intangible elements.
Regardless of the implementation framework, it is vital to capture all of the resources necessary to succeed with an implementation plan or concept. The physical and technological resources for implementing plans are those things that the plan or concept requires in order for organizational members to successfully implement it. It is important to think through what is required, because without careful and thorough thinking in this area, leaders often miss one or more important elements for project success.
In addition to physical and technological resources, effective implementation planning requires appropriately scheduling the implementation plan. This activity divides into two fundamental skill sets. The first skill set is to think through the entire plan and to anticipate how much each of the major elements will take to complete. With this first element of implementation scheduling, effective project leaders recognize that change often involves building consensus and bringing key stakeholders along.
The second element of implementation planning involves identifying the critical path for project success. Of the many activities involved in implementation scheduling, some of them are absolutely essential for project success and must be done in a certain sequence. In contrast, some project elements are less important for the project success and can be done in a less defined sequence. To succeed with an implementation schedule, project planners must identify the critical path.
Effective implementation scheduling improves the probability of the success of implementing concepts or ideas. Bryson and Bromiley (1993) propose that implementation scheduling, when done effectively, speeds projects along and enhances the overall probability of project success. In particular, Bryson and Bromiley (1993) indicate that ineffective implementation scheduling often leads to undesirable organizational behaviors including “forcing [and] compromise” (p. 325).
Within the context of forcing, Bryson and Bromiley (1993) propose that scheduling shortcomings lead to organizational managers forcing a project through the organization and this, by itself, creates an atmosphere in which the project is less likely to succeed. Compromise, rather than collaborative problem-solving, can also stem from ineffective project scheduling (Bryson & Bromiley, 1993). Implementation scheduling, when done properly, offers a greater probability of success with concepts or ideas.
The next step in implementation planning in this module is to establish a process to review the project and also to determine the key indicators of project success. From a review process perspective, leaders create a method whereby they discover where the project is off-track to determine appropriate approaches to solve project difficulties (Laufer, Hoffman, Russell, & Cameron, 2010). A key element of the project review process is to diagnose, as specifically as possible, the underlying dynamics that led to the project difficulties. Additionally, the project review process should also include a specific approach to understand and to resolve the project difficulty.
Like Module One, Module Two also links new plans or concepts with entrepreneurship or intrapreneurship in the context of new ideas and change. Battilana, Gilmartin, Segul, Pache, and Alexander (2010) outline three key activities associated with successfully implementing change with respect to new ideas or concepts: “communicating the need for change, mobilizing others to support the change, and evaluating the change implementation” (p. 422). This module helps explicate the link between new concepts or ideas in entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship. The implementation planning in Module Two provides the basis for the topics in Module Three: company and key personnel for your idea or concept.
References
Battilana, J., Gilmartin, M., Segul, M., Pache, A. C., & Alexander, J. A. (2010). Leadership competencies for implementing planned organizational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 422–438. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.007
Bryson, J., & Bromiley, P. (1993). Critical factors affecting the planning and implementation of major projects. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 319–337. doi:10.1002/smj.4250140502
Ciabuschi, F., Perna, A., & Snehota, I. (2012, June). Assembling resources when forming a new business. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 220–229. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.11.029
Laufer, A., Hoffman, E., Russell, J., & Cameron, W. (2015, April). What successful project managers do. MIT Sloan Management Review, 56(3), 42–52.
Nystrom, A. (2012, February). A commentary essay on “Resources prospectively: How actors mobilize resources in business settings.” Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 175–176. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.018
T
his module addresses your implementation plan through four perspectives: th
e physical and
technological resources required for your concept or idea, the implementation schedule for your
concept or idea, a method to review the process and indicators of success, and the link between the
implementation of your plan and entrepreneurs
hip or intrapreneurship. These perspectives are not the
only framework for implementation, but rather one of many suitable frameworks.
As an example of one such implementation framework, Nystrom (2012) outlines a two
–
step framework
that combines resources
and knowledge for successful implementation. In this conception, resources
include “physical assets, financial assets, and human assets” that leaders then combine with knowledge
to implement concepts or ideas (p. 175). In contrast, Ciabuschi, Perna, and S
nehota (2012) stratify
resources into “tangible, intangible, human, technological, and financial” (p. 221). In the former
framework, implementation planning moves according to the type of asset. In the latter conception,
implementation planning also captur
es both tangible and intangible elements.
Regardless of the implementation framework, it is vital to capture all of the resources necessary to
succeed with an implementation plan or concept. The physical and technological resources for
implementing plans
are those things that the plan or concept requires in order for organizational
members to successfully implement it. It is important to think through what is required, because
without careful and thorough thinking in this area, leaders often miss one or mo
re important elements
for project success.
In addition to physical and technological resources, effective implementation planning requires
appropriately scheduling the implementation plan. This activity divides into two fundamental skill sets.
The first s
kill set is to think through the entire plan and to anticipate how much each of the major
elements will take to complete. With this first element of implementation scheduling, effective project
leaders recognize that change often involves building consensu
s and bringing key stakeholders along.
The second element of implementation planning involves identifying the critical path for project success.
Of the many activities involved in implementation scheduling, some of them are absolutely essential for
projec
t success and must be done in a certain sequence. In contrast, some project elements are less
important for the project success and can be done in a less defined sequence. To succeed with an
implementation schedule, project planners must identify the criti
cal path.
Effective implementation scheduling improves the probability of the success of implementing concepts
or ideas. Bryson and Bromiley (1993) propose that implementation scheduling, when done effectively,
speeds projects along and enhances the overa
ll probability of project success. In particular, Bryson and
Bromiley (1993) indicate that ineffective implementation scheduling often leads to undesirable
organizational behaviors including “forcing [and] compromise” (p. 325).
Within the context of forci
ng, Bryson and Bromiley (1993) propose that scheduling shortcomings lead to
organizational managers forcing a project through the organization and this, by itself, creates an
atmosphere in which the project is less likely to succeed. Compromise, rather tha
n collaborative
problem
–
solving, can also stem from ineffective project scheduling (Bryson & Bromiley, 1993).
Implementation scheduling, when done properly, offers a greater probability of success with concepts
or ideas.
The next step in implementation pl
anning in this module is to establish a process to review the project
and also to determine the key indicators of project success. From a review process perspective, leaders
This module addresses your implementation plan through four perspectives: the physical and
technological resources required for your concept or idea, the implementation schedule for your
concept or idea, a method to review the process and indicators of success, and the link between the
implementation of your plan and entrepreneurship or intrapreneurship. These perspectives are not the
only framework for implementation, but rather one of many suitable frameworks.
As an example of one such implementation framework, Nystrom (2012) outlines a two-step framework
that combines resources and knowledge for successful implementation. In this conception, resources
include “physical assets, financial assets, and human assets” that leaders then combine with knowledge
to implement concepts or ideas (p. 175). In contrast, Ciabuschi, Perna, and Snehota (2012) stratify
resources into “tangible, intangible, human, technological, and financial” (p. 221). In the former
framework, implementation planning moves according to the type of asset. In the latter conception,
implementation planning also captures both tangible and intangible elements.
Regardless of the implementation framework, it is vital to capture all of the resources necessary to
succeed with an implementation plan or concept. The physical and technological resources for
implementing plans are those things that the plan or concept requires in order for organizational
members to successfully implement it. It is important to think through what is required, because
without careful and thorough thinking in this area, leaders often miss one or more important elements
for project success.
In addition to physical and technological resources, effective implementation planning requires
appropriately scheduling the implementation plan. This activity divides into two fundamental skill sets.
The first skill set is to think through the entire plan and to anticipate how much each of the major
elements will take to complete. With this first element of implementation scheduling, effective project
leaders recognize that change often involves building consensus and bringing key stakeholders along.
The second element of implementation planning involves identifying the critical path for project success.
Of the many activities involved in implementation scheduling, some of them are absolutely essential for
project success and must be done in a certain sequence. In contrast, some project elements are less
important for the project success and can be done in a less defined sequence. To succeed with an
implementation schedule, project planners must identify the critical path.
Effective implementation scheduling improves the probability of the success of implementing concepts
or ideas. Bryson and Bromiley (1993) propose that implementation scheduling, when done effectively,
speeds projects along and enhances the overall probability of project success. In particular, Bryson and
Bromiley (1993) indicate that ineffective implementation scheduling often leads to undesirable
organizational behaviors including “forcing [and] compromise” (p. 325).
Within the context of forcing, Bryson and Bromiley (1993) propose that scheduling shortcomings lead to
organizational managers forcing a project through the organization and this, by itself, creates an
atmosphere in which the project is less likely to succeed. Compromise, rather than collaborative
problem-solving, can also stem from ineffective project scheduling (Bryson & Bromiley, 1993).
Implementation scheduling, when done properly, offers a greater probability of success with concepts
or ideas.
The next step in implementation planning in this module is to establish a process to review the project
and also to determine the key indicators of project success. From a review process perspective, leaders
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!