Course Project Task II Annotated Bibliography
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Course Project Task II Annotated Bibliography
Short Paper/Case Study Analysis Rubric
Requirements of submission: Short paper assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. Page length requirements: 1-2 pages undergraduate courses; 2-4 pages graduate courses.
Refer to this link for viewing and printing Turnitin paper feedback.
Instructor Feedback : Students can find their feedback in the grade book as an attachment.
Critical Elements Distinguished Proficient Emerging Not Evident Value Main Elements Includes all of the main elements and requirements and cites multiple examples to illustrate each element (23-25)
Includes most of the main elements and requirements and cites many examples to illustrate each element (20-22)
Includes some of the main elements and requirements (18-19)
Does not include any of the main elements and requirements (0-17)
25 Inquiry and Analysis Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of multiple concepts (18-20)
Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of some concepts (16-17)
Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of minimal concepts (14-15)
Does not provide in-depth analysis (0-13)
20 Integration and Application All of the course concepts are correctly applied (9-10)
Most of the course concepts are correctly applied (8)
Some of the course concepts are correctly applied (7)
Does not correctly apply any of the course concepts (0-6)
10 Critical Thinking Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples (18-20)
Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence (16-17)
Draws logical conclusions, but does not defend with evidence (14-15)
Does not draw logical conclusions (0-13)
20 Research Incorporates many scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of research (14-15)
Incorporates some scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of research (12-13)
Incorporates very few scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research (11)
Does not incorporate scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research (0-10)
15 Writing (Mechanics/Citations)
No errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (9-10)
Minor errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (8)
Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (7)
Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (0-6)
Module 3 Assignment 1: Course Project Task II/Annotated Bibliography
During Module 2, you identified four journal empirical articles related to your research question. In this module, select two more articles related to your topic, totaling to six sources by this module that you would have gathered.
For the first assignment this module, select two of those six sources and using the guidelines provided on the Module 3-page 2 lecture page, create the annotated bibliographies of the two sources and submit to the M3A1 drop box. Each annotation must be no longer than 150-200 words.
This submission will automatically be reviewed by Turnitin software. You will receive an Originality Report for matching text sections that have been flagged by the software. Review the handouts in DocSharing to understand how to interpret the Turnitin report accurately.
As you revise, make sure you have cited your sources accurately and also paraphrased the original material in your own words.
Once the revision is complete, submit to the M3: Assignment 1 Dropbox, byFriday, May 23, 2014.
Name your file W7000_M3_A1_lastname_firstinitial.doc.
All written assignments and responses should follow APA style in formatting and attributing sources.
Please make sure you review the elements of the grading criteria and associated points carefully and make sure your assignment has addressed all the elements and, in enough detail, to merit full points.
Assignment 1 Grading Criteria Maximum Points Provided reference entries for the two selected sources using APA format. 4 Summarized briefly in 2-3 sentences the author’s research purpose, methods, and key findings. Identified each article as a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods study. 4 Evaluated the quality, credibility, and reliability of the sources. 8 Reflected on each annotation’s relevance to the research topic/research questions and potential use as part of final literature review. 8 Displayed accurate APA Style and format (including the Title page) by presenting information in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrating ethical scholarship with accurate in-text citations and references; displaying accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. 4 Reviewed the Originality Report in Turnitin and corrected citations, if required, especially use of direct quotes, with appropriate quotation marks, as well as accurate paraphrasing of original material. 4 Total: 32
For assistance with any problems you may have when completing this assignment—OR—to offer your assistance to classmates, please use the Problems and Solutions Discussion area located through the left side navigation link.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!