Cost Will Always Become a Challenge for Businesses Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Cost Will Always Become a Challenge for Businesses Discussion
STUDENT 1 (Zabi):
The government procurement process begins with established statutes and regulations, and according to FAR 1.102, the vision of FAR is to “deliver on a timely basis the best value product or service to the customer, while maintaining the public’s trust and fulfilling public policy objective.”
Considering the far clause, government agencies defaulted to the lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) source selection strategy rather than the tradeoff approach due to the growing budget constraints set forth by congress.
Request for Proposal outlines the evaluation and bid acceptance criteria and bids are evaluated according to the technical approach to successfully implement the requirements of the award considering the quality and appropriateness, past performance, and best value.
The evaluation process and source selection process are determined based on the above criteria’s, however, issues and problems that impact acquisitions in today’s timeframe are budget constraints. The administration is expecting to do more with less which is LPTA source selection.
LPTA can be beneficial toward contracts that to no require too much need for innovation. LPTA enforces contractors to make products as cheaply as you can, as long as it meets minimum requirements.
A bid protest is a challenge to the award or proposed award of a contract for the procurement of goods and services or a challenge to the terms of a solicitation. Only interested parties who are bidders may file protests. The protest is filed against procurement actions by federal government agencies.
The bidder protesting the award must prove that the government agency evidently legally violated the rules set forth for the procurement process or didn’t evaluated the bid proposal properly.
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1026098.pdf
https://www.gao.gov/decisions/bidpro/bid/protest.html
STUDENT 2 (Jeremy):
I hope everyone is doing well and staying safe, as we see a spike in our current environment, we need to remember we are all in it together. This week has been just another opportunity to see the validity of what and how important government contracting can be, and the impact it takes on the tax burden of the American people.
This week we are discussing source selection and contract awards, in addition to our interpretation or example of a bid protest.
Forum Question:
- Describe issues or problems related to source selection and contract award that could impact acquisitions in today’s timeframe.
-During the source selection process there should be consideration, carefullyinfect, to the number of requirements for evaluation. Additionally, a total evaluated price is determined for each offeror. Followed with the source selection authority (SSA) will award the higher costs.
The contract award is negatively impacted by the lack of clarity in the acquisitions process and the unknown unallowable costs, that should have been included to the contract. Each of these factors affect the contract award drastically, and should be clearly stated in the solicitation per (FAR 15.304(d)).
The timeframe that may or may not be affected is wholly up to the problems or issues that come to light through the process, each should be handles appropriately an efficiently as the project progresses.
- Describe with an example of how one would formulate a bid protest.
“A bid protest is defined as a supported challenge to the actual award or proposed award of a government contract for goods and services or a challenge to the stated solicitation terms for a federal contract” (CFR 21.1 GAO Bid Protest Letter, Format and Requirements. 2020). The goal of the process is to provide anopportunity for a contracting company to protest the award or procurement that is not satisfactory to award. It must be done in a timely manner, but it givesoptions for an appeal basically to the contract the bidding company was not awarded.
References
CFR 21.1 GAO Bid Protest Letter, Format and Requirements. (2020). Retrieved from https://gaoprotest.us/bid-protest-letter/
Grady, C. M. (2011). ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY, AND LOGISTICS. Retrieved from https://www.dau.edu/guidebooks/Shared%20Documents%…
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!