Corporate Social Responsibility and International Development
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Corporate Social Responsibility and International Development
Course Code: INTL 710 Course Name: Corporate Social Responsibility and International Development
Mini Group Presentation
In a group, you will work together to research an organization (from the list shown below) and then create a PowerPoint presentation with speaking notes, which you will deliver via video presentation.
Instructions:
- Choose an organization to research from the list below.
- Create a PowerPoint presentation which includes the following information:
- Introduction and summary of a chosen organization. 2. Your analysis to discuss the pros and cons of the organization’s CSR reporting framework i.e.
the measure tools, reporting system and others. 3. Your recommendations to improve the organization’s CSR reporting framework.
Requirements:
- While you will work together to create your PowerPoint, each student must submit their own video delivery of the presentation.
- Upload #1: Your original PowerPoint file (.ppt or .pptx) with notes under each slide. Filename: PowerPoint.
- Upload #2: Your video recording. Create the video recording in your PowerPoint file (.ppt or .pptx). In case your PowerPoint does not allow a video recording, use Zoom to record your presentation with your video (.mp4). Please note: Audio only recording will not be accepted. The required video is only 2 minutes as a maximum and within the size limit of eCentennial dropbox.
- Include in-text citations (including within the speaker notes in each slide) and a reference page, following the APA 7th edition citation guide.
- References should include a minimum of 6 sources. Before you begin the assignment, please read the marking rubric.
Due in Module 9 by class meeting time. Review course website and calendar for all assignments due dates and time.
INTL 710 CENTENNIAL COLLEGE CSR and Int. Dev.
© 2020 CENTENNIALCOLLEGE.CA All rights reserved. 2
List of Organizations (also found on page 192 of the Textbook):
- AccountAbility (https://www.accountability.org/) 2. B Impact Assessment (https://www.bcorporation.net/) 3. CDP (https://www.cdp.net/) 4. Ceres Principles (https://www.ceres.org/) 5. Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (https://www.corporatebenchmark.org/) 6. Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (https://eiti.org/) 7. Fair Labor Association (http://www.fairlabor.org/) 8. Global Impact Investing Rating System (http://b-analytics.net/giirs-funds) 9. Global Reporting Initiative (https://www.globalreporting.org/) 10. Greenhouse Gas Protocol (https://www.ghgprotocol.org/) 11. Higg Index (https://apparelcoalition.org/the-higg-index/) 12. ILO Labour Standards (https://www.ilo.org/) 13. International Integrated Reporting Council (http://integratedreporting.org/) 14. ISO 26000 (https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html) 15. ISO 37001 (https://www.iso.org/iso-37001-anti-bribery-management.html) 16. Natural Capital Protocol (https://naturalcapitalcoalition.org/) 17. OECD Responsible Business Conduct (http://mneguidelines.oecd.org/) 18. Reporting 3.0 (https://reporting3.org/) 19. Social Accountability International (http://www.sa-intl.org/) 20. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (https://www.sasb.org/) 21. Sustainable Development Goals (https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/) 22. United Nations Global Compact (https://www.unglobalcompact.org/) 23. UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/un-guiding-
principles/) 24. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html) 25. UN Principles for Responsible Investment: http://www.unpri.org/ 26. ILO: https://www.ilo.org/global/lang–en/index.htm
Please submit your presentation in the Assignment submission folder on eCentennial by class day and time in Module 9. Good luck!
https://www.accountability.org/
https://www.corporatebenchmark.org/
http://b-analytics.net/giirs-funds
https://www.globalreporting.org/
https://apparelcoalition.org/the-higg-index/
http://integratedreporting.org/
https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html
https://www.iso.org/iso-37001-anti-bribery-management.html
https://naturalcapitalcoalition.org/
http://mneguidelines.oecd.org/
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
https://www.unglobalcompact.org/
https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/un-guiding-principles/
https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/un-guiding-principles/
http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html
https://www.ilo.org/global/lang–en/index.htm
INTL 710 CENTENNIAL COLLEGE CSR and Int. Dev.
© 2020 CENTENNIALCOLLEGE.CA All rights reserved. 3
Marking Rubric: 20 pts, worth 10% of your final grade.
Criteria Traits Points Excellent Good Fair Poor Research Use of sources
shows exceptional consideration of the relationship amongst the research, weighs different vantage points or opinions, and shows outstanding balance in utilizing sources.
Several sources are used evenly and appropriately throughout the document; sources are cited/mentioned.
Some sources are used evenly and appropriately throughout the document; sources are cited/mentioned.
Sources are not incorporated into the document.
/3
Critical Analysis
Excellent critical analysis that shows a strong link between the literature research and theory applications and observation (if applicable).
Thoughtful recommendations for the organization.
Some critical analysis that shows a good link between the literature research and theory applications and observation.
Some good recommendations for the organization.
Some critical analysis but shows a weak link between the literature research and theory applications and observation.
Irrelevant recommendations for the organization.
Lack of critical analysis.
No recommendation written for the organization.
/6
PowerPoint All required slides are included. PowerPoint is of professional quality. It highlights key points, no spelling mistakes, there are few words with appropriate pictures and graphics.
Most of the required slides are included. PowerPoint is of professional quality. It highlights key points, there are some spelling mistakes, it does not include too many words and shows some appropriate pictures and graphics.
Some of the required slides are included. PowerPoint could be more professional.
A few spelling mistakes, has slides with many words without pictures and graphics.
Many required slides are missing or PowerPoint is of amateur quality.
Many spelling mistakes, slides include too many words.
/6
APA style/ format References & In-text citation
Includes 6 or more reliable sources.
Includes 5-6 reliable sources to the text or other resources
Includes 4 or fewer references to the text or other resources
No references were displayed
/3
INTL 710 CENTENNIAL COLLEGE CSR and Int. Dev.
© 2020 CENTENNIALCOLLEGE.CA All rights reserved. 4
Follows appropriate APA formatting.
within their response.
Follows appropriate APA formatting with some errors.
within their response.
Attempts appropriate APA formatting with multiple errors.
throughout the content.
No attempt to use APA formatting is used when required.
Organization The presentation
was well organized, well prepared and easy to follow.
The presentation had organizing ideas but could have been much stronger with better preparation.
There were minimal signs of organization or preparation.
The presentation lacked organization and had little evidence of preparation.
/2
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!