Contrasting Rip Van Winkle and Hugh Wolfe
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
The perfect number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Contrasting Rip Van Winkle and Hugh Wolfe
(Attention: This has to be done in your own words, not an AI, because it will be reviewed by turning it in.) (Secondly, another assignment will follow after this outline.) I would need Help With the second assignment relative to this one.)Write a comparison or contrast between two corresponding characters in the table below. You will choose three points of comparison from the pool below as your points of comparison or contrast. Remember that comparison or contrast writing aims to reveal something meaningful about the characters and their relationships to the text.
You will be using a point-by-point style of comparison, and you will have two choices for your thesis statement:
While some differences between __________ and __________ (names of characters in the pairing you chose) are evident, they are similar in the aspects of __________, __________, and __________ (you will determine three points of comparison from the pool, and those will become the topics of your three body paragraphs).
While some similarities between __________ and __________ (names of characters in the pairing you chose) are evident, they are different in the aspects of __________, __________, and __________ (you will determine three points of comparison from the pool, and those will become the topics of your three body paragraphs).
Choose one of these pairings:
Choose three of these traits:
- Rip Van Winkle and Hugh Wolfe
- Confidence
- Deborah and Desiree Aubigny
- Boldness
- Dame Van Winkle and Mrs. Hale
- Empathy toward others
- Faith Brown and Minnie Wright
- Perseverance
- Maia Kobabe and Justin Torres
- Integrity
- Honor
Q74. Balancing Technology and Traditional Police Duties
I need two replies to this discussion board on either agreeing or disagreeing. 150 words for each reply
Basic Investigative Responsibilities
There is no duty more important than information gathering by police officers and detectives (Hess et al., 2017). “Detailed notes can make or break a case” (Hess et al., 2017, 2-1). The quality of an officer’s report is often what makes the difference in the prosecution of a case (Hess et al., 2017).
Modern technology is part of everyone’s life in our society. Most people carry a smartphone or personal electronic device capable of always capturing high-quality audio and video on their person. Law enforcement has also taken advantage of advances in technology by carrying digital recording devices and now body-worn cameras that capture great detail of police activity and citizen encounters. Scholars have documented the evidentiary value of officers wearing body-worn cameras, especially in domestic violence-related cases (Bowling & Iyer, 2019). This type of law enforcement technology has high levels of support from both law enforcement and the public (Bowling & Iyer, 2019).
The advantage of digital recording or body-worn cameras is the incident is recorded exactly as it happened, with no danger of misinterpreting what was said or documenting the facts of an incident incorrectly (Hess et al., 2017). Documenting the truth in an incident report is one of the most important aspects of a law enforcement officer’s job and also one of the most important aspects of humanity, as told in the Bible, “Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth” (New International Bible, 2011, John 17:17). An officer’s reputation and credibility will be based on how truthful they are perceived to be by the public, by attorneys, and by the administration of their employing agency.
Utilizing digital recording methods can have a negative effect on the notes taken by an officer at the scene due to them becoming reliant on capturing the information from the recording later, letting their notetaking skills become diminished. Digital recordings and body-worn camera footage should not take the place of notetaking due to possible malfunctions in the technology. If an officer or detective does not take notes and the recording or storage equipment malfunctions, the loss of the digital evidence could be extremely detrimental to the case in the absence of well-written notes (Hess et al., 2017).
Using an electronic tablet to take notes may be effective for a detective or an officer with a specialized assignment who routinely responds to document scenes that are already secured. A patrol officer deals with unknown dangers that could result in an electronic tablet either being broken or used against them as a weapon.
References
Bowling, B., & Iyer, S. (2019). Automated policing: the case of body-worn video International Journal of Law in Context, 15(2), 140–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552319000089
Hess, K. M., Orthmann, C. H., & Cho, H. L. (2017). Criminal Investigation (Eleventh) Cengage.
The New International Bible (2011) The NIV Bible https://www.thenivbible.com/Links to an external site. (Original work published 1978)
Contrasting Rip Van Winkle and Hugh Wolfe
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: The student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly address the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explain key concepts or ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points or claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not fully explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts or ideas, though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims or points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content, identifying and explaining most of the key concepts and ideas, using correct terminology, explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates an exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content, identifying and explaining all of the key concepts and ideas, using correct terminology, explaining the reasoning behind key points and claims, and substantiating, as necessary or useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points) |
Zero points: The student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out of 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements, and/or the format of the citations is not recognized as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable The student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of the research collected for the paper. |
10 out of 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. There are frequent errors in the APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out of 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used effectively to support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in references and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to provide compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. The APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses references above the maximum required in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: The student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas or points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or there are numerous grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering, and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation; and logical organization; and the essay is error-free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: The student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: The student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: The appearance of the final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. The font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too much or too little paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!