Contents Objectives 1 Business situation 1 Deliverables 4
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Contents Objectives 1 Business situation 1 Deliverables 4
Name:
Contents Objectives: 1 Business situation 1 Deliverables 4
- Analyze and clearly describe the supplied dataset within an Excel workbook
- Design a possible solution (database portion only)
- Explain your analysis and database requirements
You are responsible for the design of a database for use in a future study of customer purchases and demographics. You will analyze an extraction from an operational database, clean the extracted data and design a database.
The extracted data is given to you in an Excel workbook. The name of the worksheet containing the data is orders .
As you complete each task below, answer the questions that follow. Write all answers to the questions on this document.
- Connect to the Oracle database using SQL Developer. Create a new usernamed Week3or use existing.
- Import the data from the Excel workbook into SQL Developer using the connection.
- Expend the connection, click on Tables.
- Right-click Tablesand select Import Data. Browse to the Excel workbook. Name the table SUPERSTORE. Adjust column names, data types and size/precision as necessary. See the tutorial in the course if you need more details.
- After creating and populating the table, insert a screen clipping below that shows the result of the QUICK DDL. (Right-click the table name). Your screen clipping will look something like this:
- Begin your analysis of the dataset by executing the following commands:
- Explain the construction of the commands, their purpose. How many rows are in each of the result sets?
- Continue your analysis of the data set by investigating the remaining columns of the dataset. Save the sql commands that you used in your analysis in a sql file named analysis.sql. Use comments that explain the purpose of the commands.
- Describe your analysis. Include a description of any assumptions that you make.
- Summarize your findings in a table … Something like this:
Attribute name Data type Number of distinct values if categorical Max value if numeric Min Value if numeric
- Based on your analysis propose a database design.
- List the tables in your proposed design.
- Compare your design to some other possible relational models listed below.
For example, databases 1, 2, and 3 consist of six, five and nine tables, respectively.
Database 1: ORDERS, ORDERLINE, CUSTOMER, ADDRESS, PRODUCT, SALES
Database 2: CUSTOMER, REGION, ORDERS, TRANSACTION HISTORY, PRODUCT
Database 3: CUSTOMER, ORDERS, PRODUCT, CATEGORY, SUB_CATEGORY, SEGMENT, ADDRESS, SHIPPING, CUSTOMER_SHIPMENT
After considering alternative designs, did you modify your initial design? Why or why not?
- Finalize your design. Create and populate the tables that you include in your final design. It is required that one table is named ORDERS.
- Is it necessary to name a table ORDERS instead of ORDER? Why?
- List the tables in your database design in a table … Something like this.
Table name Primary key Foreign Key(s) Attributes ORDERS ORDER_ID CUSTOMER_ID .
.
.
ORDER_ID CUSTOMER_id
.
.
.
- Export the DDL of your design.
- What is the name of the file containing the DDL?
- Import the DDL into Data Modeler and review the resulting relational diagram.
- Place a screen clipping of your relational diagram in the space below.
- List at least three resources in APA style that you used to complete the tasks in this assignment.
- List three things that you learned from this?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!