Construct Organizational Training Strategies Assignment
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Construct Organizational Training Strategies Assignment
Regulation
Course Outcomes
- HS450-6: Construct organizational training strategies that resolve emerging issues in a healthcare environment.
- GEL-1.2: Demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original materials in Standard American English.
Unit Outcomes
- Differentiate between the concepts of strategy and strategic management.
- Apply analyses of internal and external environments to strategic planning.
- Describe a business model and its component parts.
- Understand the purposes of strategic alliances.
- Describe the relationships among alliance motivation, structure, and outcomes.
Instructions
You are a healthcare executive for a large hospital, serving as the Director of Health in formation. There are serious concerns regarding the competence of your healthcare staff. To address these concerns, you will develop an action plan. Please complete each part of your action plan as indicated below.
Part
Competency Assessed
Instructions
- Determine policies and procedures to monitor abuse or fraudulent trends
Evaluate at least three (3) types of abuse or fraud that may occur within a health information management department. Determine at least three (3) organizational policies and procedures that monitor such activities and critique the effectiveness of each policy/procedures.
- Create and implement staff orientation and training programs
Based upon the identified trends of abuse or fraud, develop a staff orientation and training program for medical billing and coding employees. Design an outline of the program — constructing the learning activities involved. Your plan should indicate a leadership approach that you would use in the implementation of the program.
- Evaluate initial and on- going training programs
Develop a plan to evaluate the training program at “time of launch” and then at periodic times over the next 2 years. Appraise the effectiveness of our training program evaluation plan.
- Facilitate the use of enterprise-wide information assets to support organizational strategies and objectives
Analyze the enterprise-wide information assets that you need to support organizational strategies and objectives. Differentiate at least three (3) assets and their role with ensuring quality healthcare. Please include the relationship of the asset to information management planning, enterprise information management, and/or master data/information management.
Assignment Requirements
- Please complete all parts in a Microsoft Word document.
- The body of your document should be at least 1500 words in length. A title page and a reference page should also be included but do not apply to the length requirement.
- Quoting should be less than 10% of the entire paper. Paraphrasing is necessary.
- You must cite and reference at least 4 credible sources from the KU Library.
- Formatting should be double-spaced, 12 point, Times New Roman font.
- Be sure to follow the conventions and mechanics of Standard American English (correct grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, etc.).
- The submission should be presented in an organized, logical, and unified manner and consist of superior content that is original and insightful.
- You must meet APA style requirements throughout the submission, including title page, formatting, citations in the body of the text, as well as related references. Please be sure to visit the Kaplan Writing Center to assist you in conforming to APA style.
Pease this paper should be atleast 1,500 words, strictly on topics, original, and well-detailed with 4 scholar APA references. No repeatation or grammer error. Read and follow all instructions and answer all questions accordingly.
NO PHARGIARISM!!!
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!