Confidentiality, Integrity, And Availability Case Study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Confidentiality, Integrity, And Availability Case Study
Confidentiality, integrity, and availability or the CIA triad of security is introduced in this session. These three dimensions of security may often conflict. Confidentiality and integrity often limit availability. So, a system should provide only what is truly needed. This means that a security expert has to carefully analyze what is more important among these three dimensions of security in a system or application.
Please provide an example (and justification) where the confidentiality of a system is more important than the integrity or availability of that system. Then provide an example where the integrity of a system is more important than the confidentiality or availability of that system. Finally, provide an example of a system where the availability of a system is more important than the confidentiality or integrity of that system. For example, you might say availability is more important than integrity and confidentiality in a cell telephone system since one must be able to reach their loved ones in an emergency. Someone else might argue confidentiality/privacy is more important in such a system.
Word count 600
with at least 4 recent references
rubrics
aim Posting Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement Needs Significant Improvement Missing or No Work Submitted Criterion Score Introduction7.5 points
Provided an excellent introduction to the deliverable which clearly, concisely, and accurately addressed the topic of the discussion. Appropriately paraphrased information from authoritative sources.
points
Provided an outstanding introduction to the deliverable which clearly and accurately addressed the topic of the discussion. Appropriately paraphrased information from authoritative sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable introduction to the deliverable which addressed the topic of the discussion. Appropriately paraphrased information from authoritative sources.
4.5 points
Introduced the deliverable but the section lacked some required details. Information from authoritative sources was mentioned.
2 points
Attempted to introduce the deliverable but this section lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information drawn from authoritative sources (too many quotations or improper paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduction was missing or no work submitted.
Score of Introduction, / 7.5Analysis17.5 points
Provided an excellent analysis of the issues for the required topic. Addressed at least three separate issues and provided appropriate examples for each. Appropriately used and cited information from authoritative sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding analysis of the issues for the required topic. Addressed at least two separate issues and provided appropriate examples for each. Appropriately used and cited information from authoritative sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable analysis of the issues for the required topic. Addressed at least one specific issue and provided an appropriate example. Appropriately used and cited information from authoritative sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required topic but the analysis lacked details or was somewhat disorganized. Appropriately used and cited information from authoritative sources.
6.5 points
Mentioned the required topic but the analysis was very disorganized or off topic. OR, the analysis did not appropriately use information from authoritative sources (too many quotations or improper paraphrasing).
0 points
Analysis was missing or no work was submitted.
Score of Analysis, / 17.5Summary10 points
Included an excellent summary section for the main posting which was on topic, well organized, and covered at least 3 key points. The summary contained at least one full paragraph.
9 points
Included an outstanding summary paragraph for the main posting which was on topic and covered at least 3 key points.
8 points
Included a summary paragraph for the main posting which was on topic and provided an appropriate closing.
5 points
Included a summary paragraph but, this section lacked content or was disorganized.
1 point
Included a few summary sentences for the main posting.
0 points
Did not include a summary for the main posting.
Score of Summary, / 10Use of Authoritative Sources5 points
Included and properly cited three or more authoritative sources with complete publication or retrieval information. No formatting errors.
4 points
Included and properly cited three or more authoritative sources (minor errors allowable). Reference list entries contain sufficient information to enable the reader to find and retrieve the cited sources.
3 points
Included and cited two or more authoritative sources (minor errors in citations or reference entries). Reference list entries contain sufficient information to enable the reader to find and retrieve the cited sources.
2 points
Included and cited at least one authoritative source (minor errors in citations or reference entries). Reference list entries contain sufficient information to enable the reader to find and retrieve the cited sources.
1 point
Mentioned at least one authoritative source but, the citations and/or reference list entries lacked required information (not sufficient to retrieve the correct resource).
0 points
References and citations were missing. Or, no work submitted.
Score of Use of Authoritative Sources, / 5Professionalism5 points
No formatting, grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. Submitted work shows outstanding organization and the use of color, fonts, titles, headings and sub-headings, etc. is appropriate to the assignment type.
4 points
Work contains minor errors in formatting, grammar, spelling or punctuation which do not significantly impact professional appearance. Work needs some polishing to improve professional appearance.
3 points
Errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation which need attention / editing to improve professional appearance of the work.
2 points
Submitted work has numerous errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Substantial polishing / editing is required.
1 point
Submitted work is difficult to read and/or understand. OR, work has significant errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, punctuation, or word usage which detract from the overall professional appearance of the work.
0 points
No submission.
Score of Professionalism, / 5
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!