Compulsive self-monitoring and self-criticism
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Compulsive self-monitoring and self-criticism
Compulsive self-monitoring and self-criticism are often associated with individuals who struggle with low self-esteem, perfectionism, or anxiety. It is the tendency to constantly evaluate oneself, analyze one’s behavior, and judge oneself harshly. This can have a significant impact on an individual’s mental health and quality of life, leading to feelings of inadequacy, self-doubt, and even depression.
The compulsive need to self-monitor and self-criticize may stem from a variety of underlying psychological factors, including early childhood experiences, cultural and societal pressures, or individual temperament. People who struggle with this tendency may feel a sense of pressure to conform to certain standards or expectations, and may be excessively critical of themselves as a way of maintaining a sense of control or avoiding failure.
This tendency can have a number of negative consequences, including a loss of confidence and self-esteem, increased anxiety and stress, and difficulties in personal and professional relationships. It may also lead to an inability to take risks or try new things, as individuals may feel paralyzed by their own self-doubt and fear of failure.
Overcoming compulsive self-monitoring and self-criticism requires a willingness to address underlying psychological factors, and a commitment to developing self-compassion and self-acceptance. This may involve seeking out therapy or counseling to address underlying issues such as anxiety, depression, or trauma, and to develop healthy coping mechanisms for managing negative self-talk and self-criticism.
It may also be helpful to practice self-care and self-compassion, by engaging in activities that bring a sense of joy and fulfillment, and by practicing positive self-talk and affirmations. This can involve actively challenging negative thoughts and beliefs, and developing a more balanced and realistic perspective on one’s own abilities and achievements.
Another key aspect of overcoming compulsive self-monitoring and self-criticism is to develop a sense of perspective and balance. This may involve learning to recognize and challenge patterns of negative thinking, and developing strategies for managing anxiety and stress in healthy and effective ways. It may also involve setting realistic goals and expectations, and learning to embrace imperfection as a natural and necessary part of life.
Developing a support network of friends and family who are able to provide encouragement and support can also be helpful, as long as it is done in a way that allows for mutual support and respect. Building healthy and fulfilling relationships with others can be a key aspect of overcoming self-criticism, as it can help to provide a sense of perspective and balance, and can help individuals to recognize their own strengths and achievements.
Ultimately, overcoming compulsive self-monitoring and self-criticism requires a commitment to personal growth and development, as well as a willingness to seek out help and support when needed. By developing greater self-compassion and self-acceptance, people can learn to manage negative self-talk and self-criticism more effectively, and can build stronger and more fulfilling relationships with those around them.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Compulsive self-monitoring and self-criticism
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!