Complex Psychological Process of Physically Hearing
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Complex Psychological Process of Physically Hearing
When you think of communicating, what words come to mind? Most likely the words speaki ng, talking, and writing jump out right away; but what about listening? One of the most negle cted interpersonal communication skills, and a core competency we must master, is listenin g. Listening is a complex psychological process of physically hearing, interpreting, and unde rstanding the significance of a sound (Hayes, 1991). If you do not listen during an interactio n, you cannot understand others, respond appropriately to what they say, or provide feedb ack. Parents and teachers teach children to speak, read, and write, but very few people have had formal lessons about listening.
This gap in education is particularly troubling because research shows that we engage in listening more than any other single form of communicat ion activity. One study estimated that 45% of all communication time is spent listening, co mpared with 30% speaking, 16% reading, and 9% writing (Hayes, 1991). Listening is also a n important aspect of the conversation process. Though most people think they are good listeners, studies show that the majority of people listen poorly and inefficiently (Lee & Hatesohl, 1993). Minimal training to build listening sk ills is one possible explanation, but another reason is that people think faster than they can speak. Humans have the mental capacity to hear and understand words spoken at 400 to 5 00 words per minute; however, most people speak at about 100 to 125 words per minute. While someone is speaking to you, you have a great deal of extra time to let your mind wan der and to think of things other than what the speaker is saying.
We sometimes confuse hearing with listening. Listening involves hearing, but it is more tha n just the physiological act of your ears perceiving a sound and transmitting the auditory sensation to your brain. As we learned earlier in this text, listening is essential to the process of creating meaning (encoding) and attempting to discern the meaning that other people gi ve to a message (decoding). Effective listening is important in all facets of interpersonal communication.
Learning how to be a more effective listener involves understanding a five- step process: receiving, attending, interpreting, responding, and remembering. We explain each stage below, using the example of trying to have a conversation with a family member from the other side of the political spectrum about a particular political candidate.
The first stage in the listening process is receiving, which involves hearing what your conversation partner is communicating. This can take place face-to- face or over mediated channels, such as via videoconferencing or on a mobile phone or land line. It thus involves the “technical” aspects of listening and can be hampered by communication barriers such as the types of noise we discussed in Chapter 1, including hearing impairment, bad cellular connections, or environmental distractions such as other people talking around you. To approach the political conversation with your family member, which your k now will be touchy, you might create an environment that is quiet and private to allow you both to receive the messages you will communicate to one another to the best of your abilities.
Attending is the second listening stage, and it means that you devote attention or conscious awareness to the messages you are decoding. In other words, focusing exclusively on the c onversation and not participating in any other activities (that is, not multitasking) is optim al for the listening process. In fact, individuals who multitask habitually have trouble listeni ng because they are unable to attend to the interaction (Carr, 2010). Nonverbal cues such a s making eye contact show that you are giving your conversation partner your full attentio n (Orick, 2002)— as does putting down your phone and not looking at any other screens during the conversa tion. So, when talking to your family member about your political beliefs, give them your ful l attention and show them you are doing so.
The third stage of listening is interpreting. In essence, you interpret what you have listened to when you understand what your conversation partner has communicated by linking this new information to your previous knowledge. You are making meaning in this listening sta ge. In this way, your own experiences and background become relevant to the interaction. Elements of the self and your cultural background will be influential as you interpret what s someone is saying. As you and your family member discuss your political differences, you wi ll likely try to understand their perspective better by considering where they come from cul turally and who they are as a person. How are they different from and similar to you? Are they older, younger, or do they live in a different region of the country? You hope they are ta king into account the same considerations. The fourth listening stage is responding, where both conversation partners communicate th at they are attending to and interpreting one another’s messages. This can occur in two pri mary ways. First, you can offer feedback, which is when you express attention and understa nding cues as you are listening. Feedback can be positive or negative, depending on how yo u feel about what you are hearing. Examples include nodding, saying “uh- huh,” or shaking your head no, turning away, or pulling out your phone. Second, you can res pond during a conversation by paraphrasing after your partner has finished speaking, or re stating what the other person has said in your own words, and then asking if you have capt ured their ideas correctly. In the family political conversation example, as you listen to why your family member believes what they do about a particular political candidate, you can of fer feedback by nodding or narrowing your eyes as you are thinking through what they are
saying. Then, you respond by paraphrasing what they said (“Can I make sure that I have un derstood what you have said correctly?”). Finally, the fifth listening stage, remembering, involves how accurately you are able to recal l the information you listened to after the conversation is over— the extent to which you can remember it. Listening effectiveness is frequently assessed by how well individuals can remember what they heard. Further, effective listeners are able to accurately convey information to a third party, showing that they actively listened to what the original speaker had communicated (Orick, 2002). Being able to accurately remember y our political conversation with your family member at a later date, especially the specifics o f what they said, shows them that you were an active, respectful, and eager participant in th at interaction. Your methods of meeting other people and engaging them in conversation are familiar to y ou; for this reason, such patterns may be hard to change, even if your behaviors are ineffect ive. Do you have difficulty walking up to strangers and talking with them? Do you think you come on too strong or are too talkative, or have you been told that you need to assert your self more? Do you feel you need to sharpen your conversational skills or want to feel more comfortable making small talk? Improving your conversational competency is not difficult; it simply requires that you learn and use the above methods of contacting other p eople— striking up conversations with them, establishing a rapport, and learning to listen effectivel y. (The IPC Research Applied feature addresses a specific communication challenge when o ne or both of the partners are in the military.)
IPC Research Applied
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!