Comparison of Freud’s Psychosexual Stages and Erikson’s Psychosocial Stages
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Comparison of Freud’s Psychosexual Stages and Erikson’s Psychosocial Stages
Discussion 3
1 1 unread reply. 1 1 reply.
Respond to all of the following questions related to Psychoanalytic, Adlerian, and Existential Therapy. Make sure to reply to 2 other posts and consult and list (in APA Style) an outside resource (see grading rubric below).
- Select one of the defense mechanisms from the reading and provide a description and a specific example the the defense mechanism being used. You can apply this to yourself or someone that you know.
- Compare and contrast your own family experience with Adler’s view on birth order. Is your experience consistent regarding his take on sibling relationship and birth position? Provide support for your response as to why or why not.
- According to the text, “Existential Therapy places central prominence on the person-to-person relationship. It assumes that client growth occurs through this genuine encounter. It is not the techniques a therapist uses that makes a therapeutic difference; rather it is the quality of that client-therapist relationship that heals” (p. 157).
- Question: What is your reaction related to this notion? Make sure to support your opinion with information from the textbook reading or other referenced sources.
- If you viewed the video, Good Will Hunting what role did you think the relationship between Will and his therapist play with respect to Will’s progress in treatment?
Grading Rubric for Discussion Posts- 8 Points
- Did the student answer the question fully? (4 points)
- Did the response incorporate and make reference to the assigned reading? (1 point)
- Did the response include at least one outside resource with reference listed? (2 points)
- Did the student respond to at least 2 other student posts (1 point
63727_fm_rev02.indd 6 18/09/15 11:54 AM
Engaged with you. www.cengage.com
Source Code: 14M-AA0105
Tap into engagement MindTap empowers you to produce your best work—consistently.
MindTap is designed to help you master the material. Interactive videos, animations, and activities create a learning path designed by your instructor to guide you through the course and focus on what’s important.
Tap into more info at: www.cengage.com/mindtap
“MindTap was very useful – it was easy to follow and everything was right there.” — Student, San Jose State University
“I’m definitely more engaged because of MindTap.” — Student, University of Central Florida
“MindTap puts practice questions in a format that works well for me.” — Student, Franciscan University of Steubenville
MindTap helps you stay organized and efficient by giving you the study tools to master the material.
MindTap empowers and motivates
with information that shows where you stand at all times—both individually and compared to the highest performers in class.
MindTap delivers real-world activities and assignments
that will help you in your academic life as well as your career.
Flashcards
readspeaker
progress app
MyNotes & highlights
selF QuizziNg & practice
63727_Insert 2_ptg01_hr.indd 1 05/10/15 2:10 PM
Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third-party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Theories at-a-Glance The tables in this book compare theories over a range of topics, thereby providing you with the ability to easily compare, contrast, and grasp the practical aspects of each theory. These tables also serve as invaluable resources that can be used to review the key concepts, philoso- phies, limitations, contributions to multicultural counseling, applications, techniques, and goals of all theories in this text.
The following chart provides a convenient guide to the tables in this text.
Pages
6 –7 Table 1.1 Overview of Contemporary Counseling Models
62– 63 Table 4.1 Ego-Defense Mechanisms
65– 66 Table 4.2 Comparison of Freud’s Psychosexual Stages and Erikson’s Psychosocial Stages
432 Table 15.1 The Basic Philosophies
433– 434 Table 15.2 Key Concepts
438 Table 15.3 Goals of Therapy
441– 442 Table 15.4 The Therapeutic Relationship
443– 444 Table 15.5 Techniques of Therapy
444– 445 Table 15.6 Applications of the Approaches
446 Table 15.7 Contributions to Multicultural Counseling
447 Table 15.8 Limitations in Multicultural Counseling
448– 449 Table 15.9 Contributions of the Approaches
449– 450 Table 15.10 Limitations of the Approaches
63727_Insert 3_ptg01_hr.indd 1 30/09/15 10:13 AM
Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Overview of Focus Questions for the Theories For the chapters dealing with the different theories, you will have a basic understand- ing of this book if you can answer the following questions as they apply to each of the eleven theories:
Who are the key figures (founder or founders) associated with the approach?
What are some of the basic assumptions underlying this approach?
What are a few of the key concepts that are essential to this theory?
What do you consider to be the most important goals of this therapy?
What is the role the therapeutic relationship plays in terms of therapy outcomes?
What are a few of the techniques from this therapy model that you would want to incorporate into your counseling practice?
What are some of the ways that this theory is applied to client populations, settings, and treat- ment of problems?
What do you see as the major strength of this theory from a diversity perspective?
What do you see as the major shortcoming of this theory from a diversity perspective?
What do you consider to be the most significant contribution of this approach?
What do you consider to be the most significant limitation of this approach?
63727_Insert 3_ptg01_hr.indd 2 30/09/15 10:13 AM
Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!