Comparing Two Health Care Delivery Organizations
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Comparing Two Health Care Delivery Organizations
According to the American Journal of Public Health, a health care delivery system is defined as “the organization of people, institutions, and resources to deliver health care services to meet the health needs of a target population, whether a single-provider practice or a large health care system.”
Please compare two care delivery organizations of your choice and discuss how they are meeting the needs of a target population of your choice.
Your discussion should be 250-300 words.
Each group will be allocated a FTSE 250 company (or local equivalent) to analyse. You are required to
prepare a Critical Analysis of the Annual Report and Accounts of your allocated company. Your analysis
should include consideration of:
The financial performance of the company (based on the financial statements in the annual report),
considered in the context of other companies in the same industry (I suggest that you use the FAME
database to help with this).
The commentary on the company’s performance as given in the narrative part of the annual report.
The accounting policies and principles adopted by the company, in particular examining the areas of
Revenue and Leasing. The segmental reporting disclosures – this may be something you consider when
looking at the financial performance of the company.
Your report should be drawn up as though it is an initial overview document which could be further
developed for a range of users such as actual or potential investors, employees, or civil society
organisations. Your report should be no more than 5,000 words long (excluding tables) (and no less
than 4,000 words) and should be presented clearly and logically, with full Harvard referencing where
appropriate.
The team should also complete the attached sheet, highlighting what work each team member carried
out, and evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of their team approach. I will expect your report to
demonstrate your understanding of:
Key accounting principles and the significance of the core financial statements
The limitations of financial accounting
The different interpretations which can be placed on financial statements
The possibility of bias in narrative reporting and the different pressures there may be on preparers
of FS
The uses and limitations of ratio analysis your understanding should be demonstrated through the
way you write and structure your report
I’m not expecting you to explicitly write about each of these points, but your understanding should be
clear from the way you evaluate the annual report and accounts. An excellent report will be one which
demonstrates that you have thoroughly read and considered the financial statements, have critically
compared the narrative commentary with the GAAP figures, and have used credible and reliable
sources of information where appropriate. The word limit means that you cannot cover every single
aspect of the accounts, but I would expect you to identify the core elements of interest.
How does current administration’s immigration policy impact economic, security, and humanitarian policy? How was it treated prior to 9/11? Due to the current policy, what are the challenges that the United States has regarding securing both the US/Canada and US/Mexico borders? Do you believe the U.S. policy treats undocumented migrants with dignity? (LO1.1 & LO1.2)
The Global Transportation System (GTS) includes a maritime component. Explain the key elements of this mode of transportation to include methods, intermodal connections and impact. What is the impact of a disruption? Describe the key attributes of the Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) of 2002. How has this law impacted the overall governance of security within the 360 ports within the United States?
(LO1.1 and LO1.2)
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!