Compare and contrast onshore and offshore wind farms.
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Instructions for completing the paper
1a) Compare and contrast onshore and offshore wind farms. Make sure you discuss the benefits and drawbacks of each option.
The next step is to break down your study into three logical sub-topics that properly respond to the questions I’ve presented regarding your issue. Each sub-subject should have a short title that would entice a reader looking at a group of Story Maps to stop and look into the topic further. Each subtopic should contain a central premise, which should be supported by research from peer-reviewed journals. So, if I were developing a Story Map about Indian elephants, I may include sub-topics such as: 1. Indian elephant biology 2. Indian elephant habitat 3. What distinguishes Indian elephants from Asian elephants? (Obviously, this is not an Earth science example appropriate for our course; rather, it is being used to demonstrate the concept of sub-topics.)
Please keep in mind that at least two of your three sub-topics must be scientific in character (for example, earth science, environmental science, geology, and ecology; only one of the sub-topics can be social science).
Include an introduction that situates your work within the larger context, as well as a conclusion/next steps section. Please, please, please put your name and the last three digits of your student number to the header or the first page’s top.
This stage entails conducting academic study on the topic you’ve chosen. We achieve this by employing SCHOLARY/PEER REVIEWED journals. Indeed, you must employ 6 peer-reviewed/scholarly journal sources in order to pass this assignment and receive just a D- (maximum). You must use more than 6 of them to have any chance of getting a grade higher than a D-. We recommend at least three each subtopic, for a total of around nine peer-reviewed/scholarly journals. Maybe you’ve used these previously and know where to look for them, which is fantastic! Don’t worry if this isn’t the case. We’re here to assist you.
You must have used peer-reviewed sources!!!!! THANKS!!!
Please let me know if you require any other information.
Here are four resources to consider:
R. J. Barthelmie and L. E. Jensen (2010). At the Nysted offshore wind farm, efficiency and wind turbine wakes were assessed. 573 586, Wind Energy, 13(6), doi: 10.1002/we.408
A. Bonou, A. Laurent, and S. I. Olsen (2016). Onshore and offshore wind energy life cycle assessments, from theory to practice 327-337 in Applied Energy, 180(Complete). doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.058
S.-P. Breton and G. Moe (2009). Offshore wind turbines in Europe and North America: current status, ambitions, and technology Renewable Energy, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 646654, doi:10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.040.
Crabtree, C. J., D. Zappal?, and S. I. Hogg (2015). Wind energy in the United Kingdom: lessons learned and operational challenges. Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 229(7), 727-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957650915597560
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|