Company Auto Timestamp Software for Automatic Scheduling
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Company Auto Timestamp Software for Automatic Scheduling
Question Description
Company Auto Timestamp is one of several businesses in the field of software for automatic scheduling, used by large corporations and institutions to optimize workers’ shifts, classroom distributions, and to solve several types of large allocation problems.
The market has been growing at an average of 40% per year for the last five years. At the moment, there are no major players in the market – specialized companies and products, adapted to specific markets (airlines, education, factories, hospitals, etc.) have, at best, single digit market shares.
Recent advancements in research, including the successful inclusion of Machine Learning technology, suggest that it is possible to create high quality multi-purpose software, able to adapt to different contexts and markets with minimal human intervention (current scheduling software usually requires an extensive configuration process for each client). For that reason, analysts forecast a major change in the market profile, with no more than a handful of significant players providing solutions for virtually the entire market. However, not everyone agrees with this view – some experts and analysts believe that, although promising, these early versions of multi-purpose scheduling software are flawed and not ready for commercialization and production.
Auto Timestamp has, for the last few years, specialized in scheduling solutions for airlines, optimizing the allocation of crew and planes. The company, like most of its competition, understands that there may be an urgent need to redefine its business plan and product development policy. For that reason, management has called an important meeting to kickstart this decision process. All the staff playing some type of management role, as well as some people working on key technical and scientific roles, were invited by the CEO via email, which stated:
All of us at Auto Timestamp are aware of the buzz around “all-round” scheduling software, which some say is arriving to change the market. In the last few years, we have seen a few failed attempts to produce nonspecialized scheduling software, but recent technological advances suggest that this time things may be different.
I believe it is also time for Auto Timestamp to decide concerning its future, and I would like your help and contribution to run a thorough decision process. In this meeting, we shall combine ideas, knowledge, information, and points of view to establish some kind of workable framework. Please take some time to think about this problem before the meeting, and gather some numbers and facts that you think may be relevant to the discussion. Although we shall discuss several possible paths for the future of our business, we can definitely say that we will end up doing one of two things: either we keep on improving the solutions we offer to airlines, based on our main product Air Stamp, or we consider focusing on developing a new multi- purpose scheduling product. Some of you may argue we can try both, but you’ll have to convince the rest of us that we have the resources to do so.
During the decision process, and especially once we agree on a decision, the board will be involved. Although they have the final say, it is my conviction that our expert opinion will be very influential, probably decisive.
When the meeting takes place, the CEO starts by listing the advantages and disadvantages of what he perceives as the three main alternatives:
Business as usual: keep on improving Air Stamp and attempt to profit from the expansion of the market.
Advantages: no need for significant investment and/or hiring, no risk of designing “bad product”, since a solid basis exists and is working. In case the new type of flexible software products ends up not succeeding, the current market share of 20% of the world’s airlines is enough to keep the company profitable and perhaps even growing.
Disadvantages: if the new multi-purpose scheduling software end up working as well as some predict, then both market share and profitability of Auto Timestamp will decrease significantly, perhaps leading to the end of the company or its absorption by a bigger player, at a low price.
Slowly abandon Air Stamp and make a strong investment to attempt to develop a multi-purpose scheduling software.
This would require hiring new staff, spending a large amount of money, and risking the future of the company in case the new software is not successful.Advantages: should the market move towards this new type of software, Auto Timestamp could play an important role and secure a large share of a much bigger cake, in case it manages to develop a good product. In addition, profitability is likely to increase significantly if a single multi-purpose solution can be implemented for many different clients. Auto Timestamp products, namely Air Stamp, already provide one of the most automated user experiences of current scheduling software, and the company is well ahead of most competition in terms of technological capabilities.
Disadvantages: a significant investment is required, a large chunk of it on new hires. Machine Learning Engineers and other highly qualified people are not easy to find. Finally, if the development of this new type of software does not produce a viable alternative to current solutions, Auto Timestamp would have lost a lot of time and money, and very likely a large part of the current airline clients. Even if this type of software is indeed the future of the business, that does not mean that Auto Timestamp is among the major players in this new market: no one knows who is going to be able to produce the best products of this type.
- Do not abandon Air Stamp and its development, while still investing in a multi-purpose product. This alternative is similar to the previous one, but a larger investment is required so that Air Stamp is not abandoned. On the other hand, in case the new type of product fails to deliver, the future of Auto Timestamp as a major player in the airline market is viable. The CEO believes the board may very well not provide the resources required to “play on both tables”.
At this point, the marketing director reminds the participants of the Scheduling Solutions Conference that will take place in about sixteen months. The main attraction of this conference is the presentation of the new products, and a competition will award prizes for the best test or beta versions of new multi-purpose scheduling software. Every business in the field, as well as many clients and major tech companies, want to participate, meaning that only invited companies may participate in the conference and in the competition (about 100 invitations will be sent).
The marketing director says that if the company decides to go with alternative 2 or 3, then he will work with management to try to get an invitation, but there is no guarantee of success. If the company does not show an investment in a new type of product, it won’t get an invitation. If the company does invest and still does not get an invitation and the possibility to present its product, then the new product is unlikely to take off, no matter how good it is. Finally, winning one of the three competition prizes would surely attract the attention of many new clients, and a lot of publicity as well.
Before the meeting is over, the CEO asks the participants to enumerate some of the main factors that may influence the outcome of this process, in addition to all the events and uncertainties described before. The participants mention:
The competition behavior – how many companies currently operating in this market will try to develop this type of new product, and how many succeed.
Will major tech companies try to profit from their virtually unlimited resources and access to qualified and experienced staff to enter the market, now that it promises profitable opportunities?
It is a well-established fact that the scheduling software sector has been growing at about 40% per year, but the airline scheduling sector growth has been much lower (10%). What will the general demand be? Many predict that new multi-purpose products, if successful, will attract many new clients from different sectors (they’ll be cheaper and easier to use and implement), but how many?
Should Auto Timestamp proceed with alternative 2 or alternative 3, it may be useful to consider the possibility to abandon the investment in a new type of product. Participants agree that, in case Auto Timestamp is not invited to the conference, it will not be too late to abandon the design of the new product, and this could indeed be the right choice, regardless of the investment made up to that point.
- The board and management have agreed that, for simplicity’s sake, the objective of the analysis should be the number of clients willing to pay an annual fee for Auto Timestamp products (demand measured in number of clients within 3 years). This objective depends on the market share, but also on the total size of the sector. Investment costs need not be considered – a ceiling of 10M€ for investment, in addition to the current operation costs of the company, is available for the next few years, mostly for
The CEO ends the meeting. He asks everyone to gather some numbers and as much information as possible, so that a quantitative approach to the decision process may be attempted. The goal is that every probability is quantified (for example, how likely is an invitation to the conference?), as well as investment costs, future profitability, and market share. A new meeting is scheduled for two weeks later. When it takes place, there is a lot of new information, and some preliminary decisions, regarding the way the decision problem is framed:
staff (new hires and overtime). This ceiling means that alternative 3 (as defined by the CEO in the previous meeting) is viable, but with a smaller investment in the development of a new product.
In addition, and also for simplicity’s sake, the behavior and success of competition should not be included as variables at this stage.
It has become clear that, due to its reputation as a technologically advanced company, Auto Timestamp will receive an invitation to the Scheduling Solutions Conference as long as it commits to presenting a new multi-purpose product.
Auto Timestamp has also determined that the growth of the market for scheduling software will depend mainly on the success of the new type of product and has therefore decided not to include this variable as an individual uncertainty in the analysis.
The success of the new type of multi-purpose scheduling software is measured by a variable called market shift. This can be large, moderate, or low. Estimated probabilities, based on market analysis and technological surveys, are 60% for a large market shift, 15% for a moderate shift and 25% for a low shift.
Based on the number of participants in the conference, as well as the profile of the companies that will likely be present, the best estimates for the probability of winning a prize are of about 35%, if a successful product is developed, and 0% if it isn’t. It is too soon to know how likely it is that Auto Timestamp develops a successful product, but the Technology Director believes a probability of 75% is reasonable, provided a strong investment is made, and 45%, if a smaller investment is made (alternative 3).
A Decision Tree has been built to deal with this problem. Based on market analysis and forecasts, the demand for Auto Timestamp products, depending on the outcome scenario, is included. Notice that the current number of clients paying an annual fee to Auto Timestamp is about a thousand. The information contained in the decision tree is listed in the following Table:
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!