community and societal relations assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
community and societal relations assignment
PLEASE PAY ATTENTION ON STEPS IS 2 PARTICIPANTS ONLY, MAKE IT SIMPLE NO INTRODUCTION NEEDED. ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE LET ME KNOW
GROUNDED-THEORY QUALITATIVE RESEARCH –
DATA COLLECTION
Your assignment is to gather interview data from 2 of your participants in a manner consistent with Corbin & Strauss’ Grounded Theory approach to qualitative research.
The guiding research question for your data collection will be: What have community and societal relations been like for those who are living through the pandemic?
Step 1: Write down some notes concerning your own reactions to being a member of this society right now, your history of relations with others who don’t share your political beliefs, and your attitudes about elected officials and the government. In addition, jot down any general assumptions or theoretical understandings you have about how power, race, gender, etc. influence community engagement and/or political understandings. This self-reflection exercise will help to develop your sensitivity toward this topic. Try to be aware of your own biases while conducting the interviews.
Step 2: Given the general research question given above, write a list of 5-10 questions you could see yourself asking your participants to elicit their thoughts about various aspects of this topic. For example, you could ask about how their feelings, attitudes, beliefs, encounters with others, conflicts, etc. Keep in mind that the guiding research question above is phrased in abstract, technical language, but your interview questions should be phrased in concrete, everyday language that your participants can easily understand and relate to. Your questions should be open-ended and invite your participants to describe their ideas and/or experiences in detail. Do NOT write closed-ended questions (i.e. questions that can be answered with Yes, No, or a few words).
Step 3: Select 2 participants with most interesting differences in their perspectives on the pandemic, their fellow Americans, and the government? and ask them if they would be willing to be interviewed (and recorded). The recorder is to do the next step
Step 4: Interview each of your participants for about 15-20 minutes about their perspective on the above issues having lived through the pandemic. Be conversational and spontaneous in your interview and don’t be afraid to probe into an aspect of your participant’s experience that interests you. Use the questions you developed in Step 2 as a guide ONLY—do not feel the need to ask all of the questions you came up with, but have them in mind for when an appropriate occasion comes up in the interviews. Remember, these interviews are NOT a forum for you to interject your own personal opinions or beliefs—the focus is on understanding each of your participants’ perspective. You will need to audio-record the interviews (with your participants’ permission, of course).
Step 5: Transcribe a 5-minute section of EACH of your interviews; for each, try to select a section you believe to be particularly illuminative of that person’s views. Instead of using your participant’s name, use P1 or P2 (for participant #1 or participant #2) and I (for the interviewer—yourself). After transcribing, go through each transcript and REPLACE every instance of a proper name (i.e. name of a participant’s friend, the neighborhood or street where the participant grew up, their favorite musical artist, etc.) with either a placeholder (like “[best friend]”) or a fake name (like substituting “Morristown”). Whatever you do, be consistent, so if you are using placeholders, use them in every instance of a proper name; if you are using fake names, use them throughout. When you are finished with your transcripts, they should contain NO personally identifiable information that could give away the identity of your participants. Add the interview date and a brief demographic profile of your participant (see example below).
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!