Community and Diversion Programs Argument Essay Discussion
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Community and Diversion Programs Argument Essay Discussion
Proposal for Researched Argument Essay
Please respond to the following question in a page or two. Also, remember that your topic must be derived from the subject areas discussed throughout the course. Finally, number your answers.
Topic:
Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity
Research Question: What is the question that you will be trying to answer in your research?
Background: Explain your interest in and experience with this issue. What have you already read about it? What made you choose it for your paper? Why are you interested in it?
Significance: Why is this issue worth considering? What makes it important enough to pursue for this class? What do you hope to learn from it?
Sources/Evidence: What kinds of sources and evidence do you anticipate you will need to use to support your thesis? Be as specific as possible.
Questions or Concerns: What questions or concerns do you have for me at this time about the research process?
HC 401 Herzing University Patient Centered Medical Homes Discussion
Unit 6 Assignment – Patient-Centered Medical Homes
Submit Assignment
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 65
Submitting a text entry box, a website URL, a media recording, or a file upload
Estimated time to complete: 3 hours
Instructions:
Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMHs) offer many benefits to patients, and are valued by providers and insurers, as well.
For this assignment, you will research and assess the past, present, and future role of PCMHs.
In an opening paragraph, define and concisely describe a PCMH.
In a second paragraph, explain the history of PCMHs.
For the body of your paper, explain the present structure and impact of PCMHs (approx. 500 words).
In a closing paragraph, explain the future role of PCMHs. Include relevant research to support your viewpoint.
Include a minimum of two scholarly sources on a separate reference page; APA format should be followed throughout.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Submit:
Assignment in a Word document
Rubric
HC401 – Unit 6 Assignment
HC401 – Unit 6 Assignment |
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent |
25.0 pts
5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. |
22.5 pts
4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed. |
20.0 pts
3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. |
17.5 pts
2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors. |
15.0 pts
1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement. |
0.0 pts
0
There is no evidence of a defined statement. |
|
25.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P |
30.0 pts
5
Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. |
27.0 pts
4
Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. |
24.0 pts
3
Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. |
21.0 pts
2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities. |
18.0 pts
1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus. |
0.0 pts
0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus. |
|
30.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing |
5.0 pts
5
The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. |
4.5 pts
4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. |
4.0 pts
3
The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. |
3.5 pts
2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. |
3.0 pts
1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. |
0.0 pts
0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning. |
|
5.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I |
5.0 pts
5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. |
4.5 pts
4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. |
4.0 pts
3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. |
3.5 pts
2
The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. |
3.0 pts
1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. |
0.0 pts
0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references. |
|
5.0 pts |
Total Points: 65.0 |
Previous Next
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!