Communications Social Media Algorithm Essay
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Communications Social Media Algorithm Essay
For ARP1, please select a topic and use concepts from at least two academic texts that we have read in this unit to analyze that topic. Topics may range from algorithmic systems (social media platforms, risk assessment tools, facial recognition, financial algorithms, etc.) to non-algorithmic ways of sorting and evaluating people and things (Yelp!, IQ tests, SAT tests, debates around identity-sorting mechanisms such as race and gender, and so on). The academic texts from this unit include the following:
O’Neill (2016). “Introduction” and “Bomb parts: What is a model?” pp. 1–32 in Weapons of Math Destruction. New York: Broadway books.
Tarleton Gillespie (2016). “Algorithm,” in Ben Peters (ed.) Digital Keywords. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Massimo Mazzotti (2017). “Algorithmic life,” Los Angeles Review of Books, January 22.
Langdon Winner (1980). “Do artifacts have politics?” Daedalus, 109 (1): 121–136.
Ian Hacking (2006). “Making up people,” London Review of Books, August 17.
Nick Seaver (2012). “Algorithmic recommendations and synaptic functions,” Limn.
Marion Fourcade (2016), “Ordinalization,” Sociological Theory, 34(3): 175–195.
John Cheney-Lippold (2017). “Categorization: Making data useful,” pp. 37–93 in We Are Data: Algorithms and the Makings of Our Digital Selves. New York: NYU Press.
Kate Crawford and Trevor Paglen (2019), “Excavating AI: The Politics of Training Sets for Machine Learning,” AI Now Research Institute, September 19.
Os Keyes (2019). “Counting the countless,” Real Life, April 8.
Communications Social and Real Interests Question
Instructions:
Go to O*NET (Links to an external site.)
Click Advanced Search
Select Interests
From the Interests list, select top 2 interests of yours
For each Interest, select at least 3 occupations that stood out for you.
For each occupation you select, write a short summery and share why did you select it.
Assignment:
You must submit your assignment by Sunday at 11:59 pm. You can upload a file like a word document or PDF by clicking the blue submit button on the upper right side of this page or you may type your text directly into canvas. For this assignment, you should submit your top 2 Interests and a total of 6 occupations with their summaries and your thoughts (each 3 occupations should belong to the same interest).
Chicago social media and Fake News Paper
Due Friday 2pm CT
Before social media platforms DE platformed Trump in the wake of the Jan 6, 2021 insurrection, they sought to manage his disinformation campaigns through moderating and flagging his spread of hate speech. Compare how Facebook and Twitter handled Trump in 2020 via the hyperlinks below comment on the role social media played in his disinformation campaigns before his full DE platforming on Jan 6, 2021.
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/03/trumps-statement…
https://www.theverge.com/21275532/trump-twitter-so…
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-new…
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/03/us/politics/tru…
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/jun/08…
https://www.npr.org/2020/06/18/880377872/facebook-…
https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/5/29/21275173/twit…
Communications Social Media Algorithm Essay
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Communications Social Media Algorithm Essay
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!