Communications Politics and Cultural Competency Essay
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Communications Politics and Cultural Competency Essay
Communications, Politics, Cultural, Competency, Essay
Please evaluate the following scenario. This scenario includes an interpersonal exchange where a scenario with a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and a Project Management Office Director (PMOD) are attending a meeting.
They are leaders at a healthcare provider organization where an enterprise electronic health record program is in place including the installation of a myriad of applications and technology infrastructure components across a series of hospitals and employed physician offices. To date, the CEO has been working closely with the PMOD and they have built a relationship with a mutual understanding of the program’s strengths and weaknesses.
Nevertheless, the CEO, Angela Jones, is young in her career and slightly nervous to talk to the PMOD today. She knows from looking at the program dashboard that at least four of the project’s statuses are turning from green to yellow indicating issues.
She is certain that many of the program delays have to do with operational challenges with her management team involved in implementing some of the technologies that challenge current physician workflows like decision-based order entry and treating patients online. Angela has heard of scenarios where Boards of Directors evaluate CEOs poorly based upon their inability to execute new technology innovations.
The PMOD, Robert McNair is an experienced PMO Director who has led Project Offices in health care and non-health care settings for over 25 years.
The enterprise electronic health record program has reached a “yellow” status on the executive organizational program dashboard (there are three projects that are currently in a caution status based on time, resources or scope). In speaking to the project managers who are handling these three projects, issues delaying project execution have to do with extended timelines occurring due to training physicians on new work flows.
The project managers are not completely sure whether they should allocate more time for training and possibly delay project go-live dates or deploy these technologies on dates as planned and communicated to the executive stakeholders and follow up with additional training after the go live. After discussion and collaboration, both the CEO and the PMOD feel that they can overcome the obstacles and that the projects will continue successfully.
Angela agreed that she will talk to the other executive stakeholders about one of the projects go-lives being delayed for two additional weeks in order for the physicians to have more training in online care. This makes sense to her because the organization brought in nurse practitioners and physician assistants to also do online care visits and thus increased the scope during the project.
For the other two projects, Angela advises that the go-live date should stay as planned. She will talk with the chief medical officer, chief financial officer and other executive stakeholders about the need to meet these deadlines and offer additional post go live training for physicians who need additional help.
Your first post contains two parts.
Part 1:
In your initial post, you will:
Reflect on the scenario and identify two cultural and/or political elements which are illustrated in the scenario. Elaborate on how these elements impact the program and the individual projects that are described in the scenario.
Part 2:
Describe how the two obstacles discussed in the scenario represent technical, financial, and operational risk for the organization.
Articulate how these risks are perceived by each of the stakeholders in the scenario. After analyzing the obstacles, describe at least two cultural or political factors that the CEO and PMOD considered in working through these two obstacles. Reflect on how the interaction between the CEO and PMOD affected the risks that you identified.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!