Collection of Themes Essay Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Collection of Themes Essay Assignment
Style Up to 10 marks are awarded for presenting rigorous, critical evaluation with clear evidence of synthesis and well referenced and defended arguments.
Introduction 5 marks can be awarded for the quality of the introduction. This should set up the work and establish the structure, contribution and value of each element of the analysis.
Identification of scenario actions and issues to develop the critical reviews it is necessary to focus down the scenarios developed in coursework 1 into clear actions and associated issues. The student can use a range of techniques and determine a collection of themes to narrow down. 15 marks are awarded for this.
Clarification and justification of themes/issues to focus on to allow for depth of analysis the themes or issues are required to be focused down to two or three key topic areas. This section awards 5 marks for the ability to filter the content and select the focus for the work. Critical Review Issues The critical review of issues is split between theoretical underpinning and practical realism.
The student is expected to examine each issue and explain from a theoretical perspective the implications and potential actions. This is worth 40 marks. The student then explores the issues from a practical realism perspective using their own experiences, reflective practice and experience within the industry and field. This is worth 20 marks.
Conclusion The final conclusion to the work is worth 5 marks. This is expected to provide closure on the purpose of the paper and the key propositions made.
Writing Style
The following is a general guide to academic writing. HOWEVER, for your assessment, REMEMBER to follow the advice of the tutor.
Page | 4
Some Advice on Writing for An Academic Audience
Five Steps for Effective Writing
Consider Your Audience for The Paper Decide how your readers will use your document and narrow your message to their interests. Choose details to be included on the basis of the audience’s experience and knowledge of your subject.
Will there be a single reader or multiple readers? What are the interests of your audience? How will the readers use your information? How much do your readers already know about the subject?
Anticipate Special Reader Reactions If you think your audience will be skeptical because of the data you cite or the polices you advocate, or if you foresee a personality or situational problem in the reader’s accepting your message, deal with the problem up front. Usually this consideration means refuting alternatives and supporting your conclusions with additional evidence and authority. Will there be skepticism? Is there a personality or situational problem?
Outline Your Message Functionally Think before you write. Summarize your entire message in two or three sentences at most. Decide what action your reader needs to take or what action you plan to take. Answer Who When Where Why How And How Much Detail
Next expand this basic outline in to some logical format. Begin with a random list of ideas. Then shuffle your ideas into a logical order, chronological, geographical, most to least significant, categorical, or some other arrangement.
Give your reader the conclusions and recommendations first, follow with a discussion o the hows and the whys of your conclusions and recommendations; last, attach supplementary information in an appendix or enclosure.
Process Overview the objectives of the process, project, research Pinpoint and mention the number of stages involved Explain any equipment, materials, or items the read will not understand in the details to
follow Explain the process chronologically
Definition or Description Overview of the objects or persons role Describe the subject area, debate in place, cited authors, etc.
Page | 5
Question/Answer Pose unknowns or problems State your hypothesis or answer Present your support material in descending order of significance in most presentation styles Address and refute any alternative hypotheses or answers Restate your answer or hypothesis
Persuasive State your conclusions/recommendations in terms of the audiences needs Explain your reasons and benefits Refute objections and address alternatives Restate your major conclusion/recommendation
Develop the first draft Do not write in long hand. The faster speed will improve the tone and give you momentum in getting your ideas down on paper. As you develop this fist draft, do not stop to edit and polish the grammar but rather concentrate on the logical flow of ideas.
Page | 6
Edit for Content and Layout, Grammar, Clarity, Conciseness, and Style
Content & Layout
Focus on the readers interest up front Make sure your elaboration of details matches the intended emphasis Check accuracy and completeness; add authority and answer the why factor more Eliminate repetitious detail but retain first choice words Paragraph by idea and eye appeal Use informative headings, Easy to Skim lists, and adequate white space Design and use visuals effectively; bold, bullets, underlined, etc.
Grammar
Thou shalt not dangle verbals; a participial verbal phase serves as an adjective and tells us more about a noun or a pronoun.
Thou shalt not write fragments for sentences; i.e., patchy sentences which should be rewritten as one. e.g.: The lease should be maintained. Although there is no clear guidelines. Is wrong, it should read – The lease should be maintained, although there is no clear guidelines
Thou shalt use parallel structure; Incorrect – One of the benefits of the call forwarding system is that the initiator has complete control of when it can be done, to whom it can be forwarded, and for any length of time. Parallel: One of the benefits of the call forwarding system is that the initiator has completed control of when, to whom, and for what time the forwarding can be done.
Thou shalt make pronouns agree with their antecedents and functions; i.e., if you use they (a plural pronoun) then it must refer to a plural noun such as chairs. A singular pronoun (it) must refer to a singular noun such as chair.
Thou shalt make verbs agree with their subjects; a single subject calls for a single verb; a plural subject calls for a plural verb. Remember that to make a noun plural, you add as S, but to make a verb plural, you remove the S. For example, The experiment proves our theory. The experiments prove our theory.
Thou shalt not change tenses and moods unnecessarily 7. Thou shalt punctuate correctly 8. Thou shalt use appropriate words 9. Thou shat spell correctly 10. Thou shalt not capitalize without reason
Clarity Measure readability Position to indicate emphasis Link to show proper relationships User clear transitions Use clear references Place modifiers correctly Prefer concrete words and phrases Use a consistent viewpoint and voice
Conciseness Prefer active voice verbs Dig out buried verbs Cut waffle (clichés, redundancies, padding)
Page | 7
Style
Vary sentence structure and length Revise weak verbs Prefer a personal conversation tone
The former may help you as you shape your articles. We have also included some notes on essay writing which may help with how you express yourself.
Writing Notes
Experience over the years has shown that at the outset of their courses, students appreciate some guidelines on the task of essay writing, be it for an examination question or assignment. In certain respects, passing on this advice is a bit like trying to teach your grandmother to suck eggs; if you have proceeded so far in an academic career it is certain that you are already aware of some of the subtler tricks of the trade.
Nevertheless, the expectations we have here may not correspond exactly to your previous practice and since your academic performance will in the end be judged on your essay writing ability it is worth setting down some elementary rules of thumb for you to consider. These notes are not intended to compete with the ranks of over-general and over-earnest “how to study” manuals aimed at university and college recruits, rather they are an elementary set of points to bear in mind whenever you put pen to paper.
While perusing these notes, remember – context is important! You will have limited time under examination conditions, compared to assignment essays – although the principles are the same.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!