Code of Ethics by Engaging in Business
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Code of Ethics by Engaging in Business
*Scenario: Is This Ethical*
You Decide – In this scenario, you will evaluate the Code of Ethics to determine if John Anderson has
violated International Widgets' Code of Ethics by engaging in business with a competitor.
You Role – The human resources department worked with management to carefully craft a Code of
Ethics. All employees received a copy of the code and were required to sign off stating that they had
read the code and agreed to abide by its conditions. If an issue concerning an employee occurs, the
human resources department investigates. As the assistant director of human resources, you are asked
to evaluate an employee's behavior. You meet with Gloria Smithson to obtain all information needed to
begin your investigation.
Key Players:
Gloria Smithson – Gloria has now been in business for 2 years. Her business is called International
Widgets, and she employs more than 300 people in the business headquarters. In the early stages of the
business, she created a Code of Ethics to govern employees' behavior. Recently, one of her salespeople,
John Anderson, seems to be under performing. Historically, he has been a stellar employee and
salesperson, bringing in new clients every month. However, over the last 6 months, not only has he not
brought in any new business, but 30% of his accounts have gone to a competitor. Even with this
downturn, John was on the road 5 days a week and continued to submit expense reports. Is this ethical?
Janice Marshall – Janice is the director of human resources at International Widgets. Recently, Janice
met with Gloria to let her know of a rumor in the company that John was actually steering some of his
accounts to a competitor because the competitor gave him a kickback.
John Anderson – John has been employed by International Widgets for 14 months. He likes his job but
was recently approached by a competitor with an offer he could not refuse. The competitor wanted to
expand his domestic market and asked John to work with him for a few months. He asked that John
provide him with the names and phone numbers of the customers he services.
He said he didn't want
John to get into trouble with International Widgets so he would contact the customers and not John.
However, he told John that for every customer who left International Widgets, John would receive a "1%
payment from the customer's first order." John didn't think he was doing anything wrong. He has two
children in college and needs the extra money, plus he could continue to try to work with the customer
to stay with International Widgets.*Scenario: Is This Ethical*
You Decide – In this scenario, you will evaluate the Code of Ethics to determine if John Anderson has
violated International Widgets' Code of Ethics by engaging in business with a competitor.
You Role – The human resources department worked with management to carefully craft a Code of
Ethics. All employees received a copy of the code and were required to sign off stating that they had
read the code and agreed to abide by its conditions. If an issue concerning an employee occurs, the
human resources department investigates. As the assistant director of human resources, you are asked
to evaluate an employee's behavior. You meet with Gloria Smithson to obtain all information needed to
begin your investigation.
Key Players:
Gloria Smithson – Gloria has now been in business for 2 years. Her business is called International
Widgets, and she employs more than 300 people in the business headquarters. In the early stages of the
business, she created a Code of Ethics to govern employees' behavior. Recently, one of her salespeople,
John Anderson, seems to be under performing. Historically, he has been a stellar employee and
salesperson, bringing in new clients every month. However, over the last 6 months, not only has he not
brought in any new business, but 30% of his accounts have gone to a competitor. Even with this
downturn, John was on the road 5 days a week and continued to submit expense reports. Is this ethical?
Janice Marshall – Janice is the director of human resources at International Widgets. Recently, Janice
met with Gloria to let her know of a rumor in the company that John was actually steering some of his
accounts to a competitor because the competitor gave him a kickback.
John Anderson – John has been employed by International Widgets for 14 months. He likes his job but
was recently approached by a competitor with an offer he could not refuse. The competitor wanted to
expand his domestic market and asked John to work with him for a few months. He asked that John
provide him with the names and phone numbers of the customers he services.
He said he didn't want
John to get into trouble with International Widgets so he would contact the customers and not John.
However, he told John that for every customer who left International Widgets, John would receive a "1%
payment from the customer's first order." John didn't think he was doing anything wrong. He has two
children in college and needs the extra money, plus he could continue to try to work with the customer
to stay with International Widgets.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!