Cloud Computing Computer Science Essay
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Cloud Computing Computer Science Essay
Follow this Instruction
First, although there is only one task for this course you will be completing five different documents, which we will call deliverables. In other words, there will be 5 separate files to upload for evaluation once you have completed the task.
Again, there is one task, but it consists of the following five separate deliverables, and they must be submitted as five separate files:
Deliverable 1: As part of the task instructions, you are given a very poorly done PowerPoint, and your task is to critique it based on the given scenario and its intended audiences. In an APA formatted document (although it is not required, I highly recommend that you use the attached template!), you will identify and discuss each thing about the PowerPoint that you find poorly done, unethical, unprofessional, etc. And for each issue you identify, be sure and explain WHY it is unethical, unprofessional, or whatever.
Deliverables 2, 3, and 4: Then you will create separate deliverables for each of the three intended audiences (leadership, employees, and customers), based on the provided scenario (online retail company!) and your analysis of their needs and expectations. These will be created as if you were really presenting them to each audience, in terms of format and content. Make sure and include the rubric requirements in each case (see attached rubric).
Deliverable for Company Leadership
Deliverable for Company Employees
Deliverable for Customer Base
Deliverable 5: Finally, in a separate APA formatted document, you will write a justification for each of the three audience-specific deliverables. In other words, you must explain WHY you chose the 1/format; 2/structure and design; and 3/content for each, based on your audience analysis. So you will have the following three sections in your Justifications document:
Justification of Leadership Deliverable
Justification of Employee Deliverable
Justification of Customer Deliverable
To recap, you will:
Write a Critique of the provided PowerPoint identifying and explaining why it is unprofessional, unethical, and not appropriate for the intended audience(s). This will be in APA format, with standard title page. I have attached an APA template and reference examples, and you also get help with APA formatting of in-text citations and references at https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/.
Create three Technical Communication deliverables for the three intended audiences given in the task instructions. For these three, you must decide on the appropriate format and content based on your intended purpose and your audience’s needs and expectations. PAY ATTENTION TO THE SCENARIO, which tells you this is an online retail company! And be sure and include the rubric requirements for each deliverable.
Deliverable for Company Leadership
Deliverable for Company Employees
Deliverable for Customer Base
Write one APA formatted document with 3 separate Justifications sections (one for each of the three audience deliverables). These will all three be in one Word document, and must be in APA format, with standard title page. For each you must explain WHY you chose the 1/format; 2/structure and design; and 3/content for each, based on your audience analysis. Again, you will have the following three sections in your Justifications document:
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!