Climate Change Escalating Faster Than Ever Before Article Analysis
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Climate Change Escalating Faster Than Ever Before Article Analysis
POST :
Climate Change is Escalating Faster Than Ever Before.
My argument for my essay will be that climate change is real and has more serious and devastating outcomes than we may think. This argument relates to my major since it covers a large issue in Geoscience which is climate change. Climate change has always been a controversial topic in Geoscience since some think it is a natural cycle that can not be avoided while other think it can be a catastrophic phase caused by humans. No matter which side you believe in, it is definitely worth looking into both sides since we only have one Earth and we need to take the measures to protect and save it from catastrophe.
My three key points will be fluctuating temperatures, rising sea levels, and increase forest fires, each of which are proven to be effects of climate change. Each of these three factors relate to each other and follow a cycle. The biggest factor of these climate changes would be fluctuating temperatures since it can lead to both rising sea levels by melting ice and glaciers and an increase in forest fires since it creates dry and hot weather. These factors are all important since it affects us all. With an increase of forest fires, we experience lower forest regeneration which affects oxygen output as well as endangering and displacing of animals. A rise in sea levels means a large change in environment where the ice was as well as displacement of people who live in, on, or around coastal cities. The more ice that melts, the more land we lose as our humans are forced inland. A lose in coastal cities can be devastating since most of the worlds largest cities are located near the coast.
My potential audience would be environmental activists, climatologists, and climate realists. My main goal would be for climate realists to see this so they can understand my point of the argument and so we can all band together to further mitigate or prevent the negative outcomes of human caused climate change. The main counter argument that I have found was that all this data is just future projecting and not actual evidence that the climate is changing, so disproving that will be my hardest challenge. Even if the counterargument is that the evidence is just future projecting, I believe we need to take all measures to better the environment regardless. We need to take care of the Earth we live on since we only have one and we cannot risk losing it.
I want this essay to be able to persuade those who don’t believe that climate change isn’t real or serious, because this world means more to me than anything and even if outcomes don’t seem serious in our future, I want people to consider their children’s and grandchildren’s future as well. I will need a lot of scientific data and evidence that backs up my claims in order for anyone to believe this as well as good persuasive keywords. I have found plenty of sources that collect climate data and its period of change that can help me support my argument.
My first potential resource is one published by NASA (https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/). I believe this source is very credible and contains analytics looking into the Earth’s climate and temperatures around Earth. This will mainly be my factual data evidence since it has many charts and analytics I can investigate.
Another source would be one posted on a credible environmental website (https://www.mfe.govt.nz/climate-change/why-climate-change-matters/evidence-climate-change) which has an easy to understand article on how climate change affects us and the planet we live on.
A third source is from (https://insideclimatenews.org/news/03102017/infographic-ocean-heat-powerful-climate-change-evidence-global-warming) which details what it assumes to be the most profound evidence of climate change and how they gathered evidence from many different scientists.
Annotations
I plan on going over the three outcomes in different paragraphs so I will most likely include the evidence in the middle of each paragraph so I can give a summary, give evidence, and then restate my claims for every paragraph. A revision strategy I think would be most helpful is going over my essay and seeing if placement of certain topics sounds good where it is or if I can find a better placement for it elsewhere in my essay. I feel like I will have some difficulty with organization.
My first source is an article titled “I Went to a Climate Change Denial Conference. It Made Even Less Sense Than You’d Think.” written by Christine Macdonald. This source is arguing that the people who don’t believe in climate change and global warming are just denying the opposing sides evidence without considering it and instead support their evidence that has been disproved by many scientists. It also talks about how “climate realists” are using outdated information to support their claims and are not thinking about the future. The source uses research from climatologists and uses it to challenge the arguments of what she calls “climate denialists”. The author of this article used research from climatologists and acknowledges the opposing sides arguments while also providing evidence from her side. This source gives me “climate realists” have. The source is located at: https://link-gale-com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/apps/doc/IOWNZQ613831302/OVIC?u=nhc_main&sid=OVIC&xid=c78f9579
My second source is an article called “Detecting human influence on the temperature changes in Central Asia” written in collaboration by Dongdong Peng, Tianjun Zhou, Lixia Zhang and Liwei Zou, all of which are geoscientists. This source talks about how extreme climate change is in Asia and how it has been caused by human influence. More specifically it goes into detail about temperature fluctuation in the area and how it was caused by a large amount of greenhouse gases.
The source uses temperature analytics to support its argument. Each of the scientists conducted their own part of research to observe how humans have affected the climate in Asia and then combined what they learned to further their understanding. The authors are recognized scientists who use their own data as well as other scientific data and combines them all into one with each other reviewing their work. It is not just the work of one biased person, but instead a team working together to get information out in the world about climate change. It is all peer reviewed. This source directly supports my argument that climate change is real and having bad effects on Earth and provides evidence proving that climate change is real, and it is serious. The source is located at (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00382-019-04804-2#author-information)
My third source is an interview done by Kevin Berger, titled “Climate Change Is Not a Catastrophe” located at (https://link-gale-com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/apps/doc/EJ3010040207/OVIC?u=nhc_main&sid=OVIC&xid=ef6e040f).
In this interview, Berger asks Bjorn about his views and his book written about climate change. Bjorn argues that climate change does not mean that the world will end and that instead it is just going through a small period of change that we all will eventually adapt to. He acknowledges its existence while also stating that there are more urgent matters at hand that we should deal with rather than focusing all our attention into the climate. The source strongly believes that climate change will not be catastrophic. His confident words and how he even acknowledges that his sources might seem “controversial” or “crazy” seems to make him more believable. Since Bjorn is a scientist, it gives him more credibility. I will use evidence of fluctuating temperatures and use those averages to prove how climate change is real and is escalating faster than we can imagine therefore making it an urgent matter and we shouldn’t just sit around brushing it to the side.
QUESTIONS :
- In your own words, identify the argument of your peer’s persuasive essay. What are they aiming to prove?
- Has your peer adequately addressed opposing viewpoints?
- Which of the summaries (or which sections of the summaries) could use more clarification? How could your peer’s summaries be improved? Please paste an example and, if appropriate, offer your own edits.
- Has your peer provided adequate credentialing information? If so, how can you tell the source is credible? If not, what could your peer add to note the reliability of the source?
- Do the sources your peer describes in the annotated bibliography connect to their argument in a clear and easy-to-understand manner? If so, how so? If not, what are some ways in which your peer could strengthen those connections?
- Does your peer acknowledge a counter-argument in one of the annotations? If a counterargument is presented, do they provide a persuasive rebuttal? If no counterargument is presented, can you anticipate some of the objections your peer should take into consideration?
- Evaluate the sources your peer has selected. Which sources do you find to be the strongest? Why do you think they are strong, and how do they support your peer’s key points? Are there ways the sources could support those key points that your peer has overlooked? Be specific.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!