Claw backs Tied to Accounting Scandal
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Claw backs Tied to Accounting Scandal
Fraud Article Summary
Running head: FRAUD ARTICLE SUMMARY 1
FRAUD ARTICLE SUMMARY 2 Fraud Article Summary
The Bloomberg news website posted an article on April 1, 2019 written by Jef Feeley and Anders Melin titled “Hertz Seeks $70 Million in Clawbacks Tied to Accounting Scandal”. Clawbacks are a measure made possible through the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that allows companies to seek punishment for the executive wrongdoings. The article states that ex-CEO Mark Frissora, ex-CFO Elyse Douglas, and general counsel J. Jeffrey Zimmerman were key players in an accounting scandal five years ago resulting in a federal investigation and encouraged Hertz to restate their financial results from the previous three years with a cost of more than $200 million. Scott Sider, a former president in an American rental-car unit, and Jatindar Kaput, an ex-Controller, were also mentioned as having a part in the accounting scandal but were not listed as defendants in the lawsuit. The firm is demanding that the former executives and senior managers return incentive compensation in the amount of at least $70 million that was received during the time of the scandal.
The restatement was prompted by the misconduct and gross negligence of the senior executive officers. The allegations of misconduct and gross negligence included fraudulent behaviors such as: misstated pretax income due to accounting errors in multiple units, incorrect methods were used to determine allowances and write-offs for some receivables, subordinates were pressured to make “inappropriate accounting decisions” to compensate for the difference between actual and expected performance, and fraudulent accounting techniques to inflate income and earnings.
The defendants refused to return the incentive compensation they received because of the inaccurate accounting results and wrongful behavior which is what prompted the lawsuit being filed. Douglas and Zimmerman were sued for their failure to report the pressure tactics of Frissora and a demand for the return of severance pay is included in the lawsuit. Frissora denies the allegations stating that he is “proud of his record of integrity and transparency in business” and believe that the claims against him will be found to be incorrect.
Because of the actions of these former executives and senior managers, Hertz has agreed to pay $16 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to settle the claims without admitting or denying wrongdoing. Their actions have also caused the company’s stock shares to drastically decrease creating issues with investors and compromising the long-term security of the company (Feeley & Melin, 2019).
Preventive Measures
There are a variety of measures that a company can take to prevent accounting fraud. In the summarized Hertz case, the company could have audited the books regularly internally and financial statements annually externally, performed reconciliations regularly, and implemented a separation of duties to prevent the misstated pretax income due to accounting errors, identify incorrect methods being used when determining allowances and write-offs for receivables accounts, and detect fraudulent accounting techniques being used to inflate income and earnings. These measures could have helped in recognizing the accounting errors and other illegal practices when they occurred and prevented further damages. Hertz could also establish an anonymous and open reporting system that would allow employees to report when they are being pressured to make inappropriate accounting decisions or when they see something that is dishonest or unacceptable behavior. Implementing measures to prevent accounting fraud is not enough. They must be reviewed for compliance, followed from the top down, and enforced.
References
Feeley, J. & Melin, A. (2019). Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-01/hertz-seeks-70-million-in-clawbacks-tied-to-accounting-scandal
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!