Message Board (Type)The Approach Unit’s ConclusionTuesday, February 4th, at 8:00 a.m.
The most common type of grading is numerical grading.
25 points are available.
Points Earned:
Deliverable Length: 1 Peer Review
The objectives for this task can be found here.
Visit:
Materials for Scenario Learning Reading Comprehension Details of the Assignment
Contribution from me:
Internet-based deliverables:
Board of Consultation
Do you require the services of a tutor? For additional information, go to Smarthinking.
All | All Expanded | All Collapsed All | All Expanded | All Collapsed
The project specifications
The task’s description
Reminder: Initial Discussion Board postings and responses are due by Friday and Tuesday, respectively.
Students are expected to post their first initial Discussion Board post by Friday each week. Late submissions will be penalized in accordance with the syllabus’s late penalty policy, and discussion comments will be evaluated. ALL SUBMITTAL POSTING TIMES ARE BASED ON MIDNIGHT CENTRAL TIME.
Students should have posted their remarks to their peers by Tuesday. ALL SUBMITTAL POSTING TIMES ARE BASED ON MIDNIGHT CENTRAL TIME.
The primary task response for this week’s discussion assignment is to analyze the Key Assignment Drafts of other students. Your first task is to post your own draft to the Discussion Board for feedback from other students. Attach your paper, as well as any additional pertinent notes, to your main discussion post. Your Key Assignment Draft is not being graded at this time. The purpose of this assignment is to help you improve the quality of your Key Assignment.
Reactions from other students: At least one other student’s draft report should be evaluated and significant feedback provided. Don’t say anything like “wonderful job” or “great job.” If you not only point out weak areas but also give advice for improvement, it will be extremely beneficial to other students. The best feedback identifies what went well, what went wrong, and what needs to be addressed in three stages.
For help with your task, examine your text, Web resources, and any course materials.
Comprehension of Text
Creswell’s book, chapters 6 and 7,
The Assignment’s Objectives
Apply critical thinking and relevant subjects to the final assignment.
Integrate and use fundamental concepts and knowledge from previous courses to handle the situation at hand, demonstrating collaborative, analytical, and communication talents.
Information Supplementary
There is no additional information to display at this time.
Legend
For extra credit, look over the assignment rubric.
All | All Expanded | All Collapsed All | All Expanded | All Collapsed
The project specifications
The task’s description
Reminder: Initial Discussion Board postings and responses are due by Friday and Tuesday, respectively.
Students are expected to post their first initial Discussion Board post by Friday each week. Late submissions will be penalized in accordance with the syllabus’s late penalty policy, and discussion comments will be evaluated. ALL SUBMITTAL POSTING TIMES ARE BASED ON MIDNIGHT CENTRAL TIME.
Students should have posted their remarks to their peers by Tuesday. ALL SUBMITTAL POSTING TIMES ARE BASED ON MIDNIGHT CENTRAL TIME.
The primary task response for this week’s discussion assignment is to analyze the Key Assignment Drafts of other students. Your first task is to post your own draft to the Discussion Board for feedback from other students. Attach your paper, as well as any additional pertinent notes, to your main discussion post. Your Key Assignment Draft is not being graded at this time. The purpose of this assignment is to help you improve the quality of your Key Assignment.
Reactions from other students: At least one other student’s draft report should be evaluated and significant feedback provided. Don’t say anything like “wonderful job” or “great job.” If you not only point out weak areas but also give advice for improvement, it will be extremely beneficial to other students. The best feedback identifies what went well, what went wrong, and what needs to be addressed in three stages.
For help with your task, examine your text, Web resources, and any course materials.
Comprehension of Text
Creswell’s book, chapters 6 and 7,
The Assignment’s Objectives
Apply critical thinking and relevant subjects to the final assignment.
Integrate and use fundamental concepts and knowledge from previous courses to handle the situation at hand, demonstrating collaborative, analytical, and communication talents.
Information Supplementary
There is no additional information to display at this time.
Legend
For extra credit, look over the assignment rubric.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|