CJ 4960 Comparative Criminal Justice Systems Capstone Project
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
CJ 4960 Comparative Criminal Justice Systems Capstone Project
CJ 4960, Comparative, Criminal, Justice, Systems, Capstone, Project
Textbook Reichel, P. L. (2013). Comparative criminal justice systems: A topical approach (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Grading Events & Grading Criteria Unless otherwise specified, all assignments must be submitted via Blackboard
Course Preparation Quiz 15 Points
Discussion Board (Week 1, 2, 4) 100 Points
Project One (Law Enforcement) 150 Points
Project Two (Criminal Law) 150 Points
Exam One 100 Points
Exam Two 100 Points
Tech Live Weekly Reflections 60 points
Total Points 675 Points
Class Participation/Discussion:
Students are expected to have read the assigned materials prior to the weekly module and be able to intelligently
respond to questions about and discuss the readings. Points will be based on the following criteria:
- Response to the posted question/topic within the week of the module keeping in mind that more than opinion is being solicited. Support your opinions/arguments utilizing course material and/or other
relevant and academically oriented sources.
- Response to at least two other students’ posts which is designed to foster interaction as well as designed to challenge one another to potentially look at topics or arguments from a differing viewpoint. Keep in
mind the intent is not to cause argument but rather to challenge thinking.
Students are encouraged to raise issues and ask questions regarding current or outside the classroom events that are related to the course. A student MUST have full participation with responding to all of the posted questions/topics for each module as well as a minimum of at least two responses to other students’ posts in order to attain the full one hundred (100) points for class participation.
http://online.indianatech.edu/tech-policies/policies/
Projects (2):
Students are required to write two (2) papers describing (2) major components of foreign country of the students choosing (instructor must approve selection). The assignments will require the student to research, write a paper, and make a presentation, by means of developing a PowerPoint presentation covering the material presented in the formal paper describing (1) Police/Law Enforcement of a foreign country and (2) The Criminal
Law Components of a foreign country. The specific topics and grading criteria for the written assignments and presentation follow and are incorporated into this syllabus.
Written assignments are to be word processed using Microsoft Word, size 12 New Times Roman font, double spaced with one (1) inch margins around the page (default), using the American Psychological Association (APA) citation method. Your research papers and presentations should be thorough and scholarly. Jargon, lingo, and street language are to be avoided and their use will decrease your grade.
By way of example, and not limitation, “cop” is generally unacceptable, “police officer” or “law enforcement officers” is preferred. A person may be “mentally ill” or “legally insane” (they are not the same), not “nuts” or “crazy”.
The material expected to be covered in each written project is covered toward the end of this syllabus. Keep in mind, the paper should be written as such. In other words, based off the material list pertaining to information that should be covered, make the information into a paper—do not simply bullet point answers.
Further, ensure that you are crediting the source(s) used for the information that you are referencing by utilizing the proper APA format. The written paper must be submitted prior to the date/time due, as noted in the course schedule, and submitted via Blackboard’s SafeAssign feature.
The PowerPoint portion of the assignment must be submitted via an electronic mail (email) attachment prior to the due date/time or utilizing the submit feature within the respective module under the assignment section. If the student runs into problems submitting the email due to size of the attachment, “note pages” of the presentation would be perfectly acceptable. If questions arise in regard to how to do so, in advance, ensure that you get with the instructor to work through PowerPoint to “print” the note pages if necessary.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!