CIS 599 IT Business Management Domains Paper
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
CIS 599 IT Business Management Domains Paper
CIS 599, IT, Business, Management, Domains, Paper
There are two discussions here that need to be responded to thoroughly. Responses must be on APA format 150+words 1-2 legitimate verifiable sources per response.
CIS599 discussion 1 post responses.
Respond to the colleagues posts regarding:
“The Four IT Business Management Domains” Please respond to the following:
- Determine the interconnectivity of each of the four IT business management domains as discussed in Chapter 2 of the Stenzel textbook on page 57. Explain how each domain impacts the other.
- From each business management domain, identify the two most important areas a CIO should accept responsibility for in order to strategically lead the organization. Support your answer with a rationale for why you believe these are the most important areas.
KJ’s post states the following:
“The Four IT Business Management Domains” Please respond to the following:
- Determine the interconnectivity of each of the four IT business management domains as discussed in Chapter 2 of the Stenzel textbook on page 57. Explain how each domain impacts the other.
- From each business management domain, identify the two most important areas a CIO should accept responsibility for in order to strategically lead the organization. Support your answer with a rationale for why you believe these are the most important areas.
The four IT management domains are
- Business Alignment
- Capacity Optimization
- Financial Management
- Service Management
In order to manage IT appropriately, managers need to consider all the aspects of the management domain and how they have impact each other.
Business alignment plan is important because it provides the goals of what the infrastructure is going to focus on. I think this is one of the most important of the four IT management domains because it guides provides some form a guide for the other domain. Managers will be able to create a plan for the other domain once they know the objectives for the business.
Capacity optimization helps determine the current state of the IT infrastructure and what areas need improvement, growth or more resources. It also helps managers determine the financial budget needed to make those improvements.
Financial management is the second most important domain. This domain determines to budget that the IT department has to purchase and maintain infrastructure equipment. Without a proper financial management, it will be hard to meet business goals, improve service or provide new services.
Service Management is a customer-focused approach to delivering information technology. Service Management focuses on providing value to the customer and also on the customer relationship. Service Management provides a framework to structure IT-related activities and the interactions of IT technical personnel with customers and clients.
References:
Stenzel, J. (2011). CIO Best Practices : Enabling Strategic Value With Information Technology: Vol. 2nd ed. Wiley.
ITS Service Management: Key Elements. (n.d.). Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://its.ucsc.edu/itsm/servicemgmt.html
CIS599 discussion 2 post responses.
Respond to the colleagues posts regarding:
“Framework” Please respond to the following:
- Evaluate each of the approaches to applying the framework as discussed in Chapter 8 of the Lane textbook. Determine how each approach would align to the organization for future growth and success. Give your opinion as to the validity of each approach.
- Identify three aspects of portfolio management that allow the CIO to strategically align IT with organizational goals and discuss why these aspects are important.
AY’s post states the following:
Evaluate each of the approaches to applying the framework as discussed in Chapter 8 of the Lane textbook. Determine how each approach would align to the organization for future growth and success. Give your opinion as to the validity of each approach.
Lane identified four (4) primary approaches to applying the framework. Those approaches include (Lane, 2011):
- Understanding the business.
- Hire from the business.
- Key Stakeholder relationship development.
- Measurement Capability.
Understanding the business is crucial. In order to properly allocate and manage the resources used in the organization to meet the objectives a solid understanding of how they will be used must occur. This is especially important for future growth and success because being familiar with the business and the objectives will enable the IT staffing to generate designs and solutions based upon the direction of the business.
The text advises that this approach is to hire within the business and to use employees that are within the company. The theory discussed is that it is easier to train someone with knowledge of the business and without IT knowledge to make the transition. Personally, I feel this concept needs to be utilized very carefully. In my opinion it is a misconception to assume that someone without IT background can pick up a position because they understand the business.
Recently on my project this exact same scenario happened, and the person ended up getting removed from the project. In situations that are fast paced, carry many types of technology and interface with customers the services are being provided with this may not always be appropriate. This person was very familiar with the business, but not IT related and was stuck as a PM on some technical projects.
Key Stakeholder Relationship Development- This concept is an integral part of the success or failure of the business. Success is more likely by ensuring relationships are nurtured with customers, and other departments outside of the IT organization.
These relationships can give ideas on what customers see for the future, designs that they may be interested in and give room for the organization to make suggestions that can lead to more business. Stakeholder satisfaction can go a long way and promote more business in the future.
Measurement capabilities allows the organization to identify success and failures in a way that can be expressed to stakeholders. These measurements can identify areas where improvement can occur, costs can be saved, and relationship satisfaction can be identified.
These measurements can also identify weaknesses in processes that can allow improvement for future delivery of services, relationships with customers, IT resources and more. These are all valuable for the future of the business.
Reference:
Lane, D. (2011). The Chief Information Officer’s Body of Knowledge : People, Process, and Technology. Wiley.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!